Code:
|||===========================================|||
||| Bioacoustic Construct: |||
||| using Harmonic Fundamentals to |||
||| allow Freedom of Physical Movement |||
|||===========================================|||"I'm allowed to go outside all by myself now."
-- Proverb of the reckless and foolhardy
... ... It's generally well-known that sound, or audio, is produced via a percussion,
most obviously stemming from the repercussion of a collision, the vibration of a string thereafter,
or arguably the reverberation of such a noise within an echo chamber (or a limitation of space).
... Ignoring the musical quality of sound allows the perception of motion,
when the object in motion can be observed to factorize friction,
presuming there is another force at play, such as a footstep heard,
when a walking critter utilizes that friction of its shoe upon the floor,
to create movement. The footstep is therefore audible since there was a collision,
of the shoe upon the floor, and the friction sent the audio waves into a dispersal pattern,
of arrays, into the distance eminating from within the proximity or vicinity of the footstep.
Lifeforms therefore exhibit a fundamental comprehension of the harmonics of movement,
within a physical realm. A higher-pitch frequency of an audio waveform is construed to imply
a smaller volume of the physical object that produced the sound, whereas contrastingly,
a lower-pitch frequency sound might be interpretively perceived to be eminating originally from
a larger volume physical object. A loud-noise seems to have been a result of a more forceful impact. A quiet-noise would seem to have been the result of a less forceful impact. The temporary duration
of a sound, or a noise, might imply the speed, or rate, that
negative acceleration stopped the movement from occuring, in the physical realm.
These evaluations are the observations of a lifeform with a natural capacity to hear sounds.
To further illustrate the statement's ramnifications, it is often said that a critter should
tell another critter where it is going, prior to going toward that place. It is often said among
critters that loud noise attracts attention, that sounds can be a way for
lifeforms to be either enticed toward other lifeforms, or to deter them from approaching.
Borderline is the notion that information procured from sound might compell a lifeform
opting to increase its proximal distance from another. A physical area or vicinity,
when hosting lifeforms, containing the critters in its location,
is said to incite conversation, or to be a conversation piece, when the critters have
traveled to that location in order to make sounds, or to have a verbal conversation, metaphorically.
That should demonstrate the lifeform's capacity to evaluate sound and its utilization in order
to procure freedom of movement. Various lively cultures describe verbal communication being a factor
in the exchange of information about different places and the routes making travel to or from
a location viable, or, plausible. The event, when a sound is heard, can provide the listener
with information about the whereabouts of the source of said sound. In echolocation, harmonic
reverberations are utilized for an evaluation of the listener's surrounding whereabouts.
Harmonic fundamentals reveal the shape or form of a chamber or an area when it affects the
outcome of an audio signal, in contrast to the original sound that was produced,
at the source of the noise. Most often, those effects are described in more detail in effect racks,
and literature describing bioacoustic cognition of sound.
... ... ... -> !-=_/`'+\
Last edited:
