• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Favourite original FX shots...

Scenes like this from Requiem For Methuselah, where 2 planets are shown in the Enterprise flyby.

requiemformethuselahhd0005.jpg

That's gorgeous isn't it?

I first watched TOS in full back in 2005 or so... back then there was no remaster, but sadly now I'm so inured to the CGI that I can't remember what much of the original shots looked like.

What I will say is they are pretty much all beautiful work. Genius people working against limitations and sometimes inventing new ways to do things. One day I hope i'll own them on DVD again so I can enjoy them as they originally were.
 
I really liked the original first shot of the Enterprise firing phasers in The Corbomite Maneuver. Two very quick bolts that looks like energy rather than just lines. Same with the original "proximity" phasers used in Balance of Terror. They looked like light bots but later torpedo shots in the first season looks like colored blobs.

Not to mention the great aft view of the Enterprise firing phasers in The Alternative Factor.

And that one awkward shot of the Enterprise approaching Tantalus 5 in Dagger of the Mind, which looked like an unused take filmed for the second pilot. It was all sorts of "slide it across the screen" rather than the camera moving past the model.
 
• This shot has extra sharpness because it didn't need a star field, so it's one film generation closer to the negative:
https://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/2x18hd/theimmunitysyndromehd0445.jpg

• Getting in this close on the less-seen underside was awesome when all we had was reruns on TV. It was mouth-watering for the Enterprise-loving fan:
https://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/3x18hd/thelightsofzetarhd0002.jpg
https://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/3x18hd/thelightsofzetarhd0009.jpg

• This is the all-time glamour shot, such great beauty— yet an angle so elusive that they didn't even discover it until the second year:
https://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/2x18hd/theimmunitysyndromehd0001.jpg
She's still got it:
https://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/smithsonian-model-june16/ent-smithsonian-june-2016-08.jpg



I can't see the images but you're probably showing pictures of my favorite shots of the Enterprise.

My favorite f/x is when they would do closeup beauty shots of the ship, like iirc, at the beginning of "Immunity Syndrome when they show the episode title. Another close shot of the Enterprise I liked was one showing the ship slightly above the saucer section from the front with the nacelles looming behind with the thingies in the nacelle caps spinning.

I also always like the shot of the Enterprise firing on the planet in "Alternative Factor" but it 'does' beg the question; "They have to turn the entire ship in order to aim phasers?"

Robert
 
Some fans have recreated the 11 footer in 3D (more often as a completed model rather than an unfinished filming miniature) or used their own well made Polar Lights 1/350 Enterprise model and strive to recreate the exterior shots we are all so familiar with right down to simulating the original camera lens and lighting. The results are gorgeous as we see the shots as if they were crisp and pristine rather than grainy and faded originals created through the old optical printers used back in the day.

Doug Drexler once commented that to properly recreate those shots one’s model should be scaled at 11 ft. rather than 947 ft. to get the perspective right.

My essential point is that so many of the original shots of the Enterprise are fantastic and would be even more so if they were sharp and pristine as we all see it in our mind’s eye.
 
. . . I also always like the shot of the Enterprise firing on the planet in "Alternative Factor" but it 'does' beg the question; "They have to turn the entire ship in order to aim phasers?"
That's a bit like looking at the stock Enterprise-in-orbit shots and thinking, "Either that planet is tiny, or the Enterprise is hundreds of miles long! And why is the ship rolled over 90 degrees?" I always saw those shots as stylized and not meant to be taken literally.
 
One of the last shots of the 11 footer was chopped up…showing the Enterprise slowing turning….nacelles turning.
 
That's a bit like looking at the stock Enterprise-in-orbit shots and thinking, "Either that planet is tiny, or the Enterprise is hundreds of miles long! And why is the ship rolled over 90 degrees?" I always saw those shots as stylized and not meant to be taken literally.
I tend to agree but I vaguely remember someone on this board (maybe @blssdwlf ) showing that you could get those shots from a ship orbiting a planet.
 
Are you outside the United States? Or maybe you're behind a restrictive company firewall on your work computer? The links to TrekCore images work fine for me.


Oops, I'm sorry, I should have explained I can't see the images because I'm blind.

I still have my memories of the show and I still have a model of the Enterprise that I can feel.

Another shot of the ship I'll always remember is the one where the Enterprise is rushing toward the camera and cuts off just as a crash is imminent. It always made me catch my breath. Of course, I know in reality, the camera is moving toward the stationary model.

Robert
 
I tend to agree but I vaguely remember someone on this board (maybe @blssdwlf ) showing that you could get those shots from a ship orbiting a planet.

I did and the shot is entirely possible. Another TrekBBS member, CarbonCopy, calculated out on an orbital calculator program (IIRC) that the ship could be in a planetary orbit rather than just orbiting around a specific point above the planet.

WNM-Orbit-export.png


WNM-Orbit-2b-export.png
 
I did and the shot is entirely possible. Another TrekBBS member, CarbonCopy, calculated out on an orbital calculator program (IIRC) that the ship could be in a planetary orbit rather than just orbiting around a specific point above the planet.
That was me, under one of my Halloween names.

For anyone interested, the original thread is here: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/tos-enterprise-question.148570/page-3#post-5292702

A reference to it in a more recent thread about ship orbits, including remarks about the image hosting in the original post: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/starship-orbits-in-trek.301024/page-2#post-13072723

It wasn't actually a dedicated orbit calculation program by the way, but rather formulas manipulated in Maple, which is the program also used to generate the figure.
 
I did and the shot is entirely possible. Another TrekBBS member, CarbonCopy, calculated out on an orbital calculator program (IIRC) that the ship could be in a planetary orbit rather than just orbiting around a specific point above the planet.

WNM-Orbit-export.png


WNM-Orbit-2b-export.png
That is very nice.

That would be best with an orbit of K-7…but a Molniya orbit is rather straight with a severe turn at the “bottom.”

Pluto actually looks a bit like the distant planet in Requiem’
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top