Hera, a Twi-Lek, and Kanan, a human, had a kid in the epilogue of the last episode of Rebels.The last theory about the near-humans would make sense since it is possible for humans to breed with most, if not all these species. Though I have no evidence of them having offspring that are viable for breeding in future.
Hera, a Twi-Lek, and Kanan, a human, had a kid in the epilogue of the last episode of Rebels.
I mean, Luke would have to prove himself somehow.What if Luke had joined Vader to overthrow the Emperor? I don't think that would actually necessary make him evil and/or want to become the next Emperor, could he have turned things good from within?
Although joining Vader probably *would* mean that he would have to crush the Rebellion first or soon after Palpatine, though.
What if Luke had joined Vader to overthrow the Emperor? I don't think that would actually necessary make him evil and/or want to become the next Emperor, could he have turned things good from within?
Although joining Vader probably *would* mean that he would have to crush the Rebellion first or soon after Palpatine, though.
But Mace Windu's coup attempt was totally cool.Hand in hand with joining Vader is embracing the Dark Side. Which yes, does in fact make him evil. Or at least evil-leaning.
IIRC, Ahsoka corrected people when using rank to address her as "commander." If "general" was an honorific for Jedi during the Clone Wars, then it seems like there was a codified hierarchy of honorifics. Maybe it was based on the Jedi rank of Padawan, Knight, Master? But in that case it doesn't strike me as just an honorific but rather as an actual rank with the authority to give orders to subordinates in the Republic forces.![]()
You're missing the obvious. Commander is a naval rank, whereas general is an army rank. Ergo, the rank system does not correspond to a real-world system. So, to criticize it on the basis of there being nothing in between alone is a non sequitur....And the very fact that the Jedi can only have one of these two ranks, and nothing in between, nicely grinds in the plot point that the Jedi were out of their depth leading a war
You're missing the obvious. Commander is a naval rank, whereas general is an army rank. Ergo, the rank system does not correspond to a real-world system. So, to criticize it on the basis of there being nothing in between alone is a non sequitur.
Well, step one would of course be "murder your father". As a rule it generally goes downhill after that...
Most Sith probably think that until it's their turn to be Master and then...well, if they were any good at resisting the temptations of power they wouldn't have been Sith to begin with, no?Vader would probably have done away with that tradition.
I don't think he truly did until literally that moment when he sacrificed his life for him. Up until that point it was just the same twisted, possessive, selfish shadow of love that got Padme killed and started this whole mess.Now maybe I'm way off base here, but apparently Vader does (at least on some level) truly love his son, or at least respects him. So I would think that Vader would neither allow, nor require, Luke to kill him.
Yes, but again, the motivation was a selfish one. He wanted HIS son to join HIM and rule over HIS Empire with HIM as the Master.I actually do believe that Vader was sincere in wanting to join with Luke, overthrow Palpatine, and rule the Empire together.
You're missing the obvious. Commander is a naval rank, whereas general is an army rank. Ergo, the rank system does not correspond to a real-world system. So, to criticize it on the basis of there being nothing in between alone is a non sequitur.
My point is that, in terms of on-screen evidence, there isn't any way to gauge how many steps there are between "Commander" and "General." And moreover the real world is no avail, since the system clearly doesn't correspond to a real world system.I don't see relevance there. The Force wielders could have retained the titles Jedi and Padawan, or chosen to call themselves Moff and Vizir for all we care; the very fact that these are not ranks through which one can progress by showing competence or heroism, but merely alternate names for the positions determined by the Jedi theocracy, is the point. And not "critique" - it's a feature rather than a bug, an integral part of how the Jedi Order conducted the war.
That the Grand Army also had people ranked Commander only seems to reinforce the point. No Clone Commander, no matter how experienced, would have been the superior of a Padawan in the command chain. No Clone could get promoted to General. Or to Admiral, but the non-Clone Admirals we saw also seemed a breed apart from the Grand Army, taking orders from the Jedi but not bowing to the Army without explicit Jedi prompting.
For all we know, the Navy of the Republic had regular naval ranks, by and large. The Grand Army most assuredly did not, but AFAWK this only manifests in the ban on higher ranks, the armored glass ceiling at the Padawan/Commander rank and position. Below that, it seems the ranks are real-world, even though it also seems the Clones initially were bred for the ranks rather than being granted them through promotions based on performance.
Timo Saloniemi
Pretty much this. In ROTJ, there was even that costuming error where Jerjerrod's costumed rank plaque obviously made no sense.Trying to make sense of the rank system in SW (whether it be Imperial or Rebel) is an exercise in futility.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.