A minority of people dislike it, yes.I think the real answer is: People dislike NuTrek.
Clearly the majority must like it or they wouldn't keep renewing the shows and making new ones.
A minority of people dislike it, yes.I think the real answer is: People dislike NuTrek.
Remember one of the most revered episode from TNG, All Good Things?
It was about Q and Timetravel.
Remember another revered episode from TNG, Tapestry?
It was about Q and Timetravel.
Remember another revered episode from TNG, Yesterday's Enterprise?
It was about Guinan and alternative Timelines.
Why don't we combine elements from the most revered episodes from TNG, a sort of best of, and make that the center of the second Picard season?
How creative! How imaginative! How exciting! Screw exploration! Screw strange new worlds.
And also let's go dark! Again!
You know, one thing that was always missing from TNG was that TNG was the only classic Trek show that never had an episode with the evil versions of the characters/evil Federation. TOS, DS9, VOY, ENT all had one or more episodes. Let's throw some evil Federation/Space Nazis into the mix, you know, get it really dark and depressing. Screw utopia.
Exactly. Don't care how inspired Orville looks. The humor doesn't work. It is out of place and off putting at times. And, yes, this would mean returning to the Berman era aesthetic and safe pacing. I get that Kurtzman Trek isn't for everyone but returning to what oversaw the decline of Trek strikes me as odd.Why bother making a change then? Why not just stick with Rick Berman?
You can't have "serious" Seth MacFarlane without bringing in "scatological" Seth MacFarlane at the same time (Family Guy, Ted).
I get that Kurtzman Trek isn't for everyone but returning to what oversaw the decline of Trek strikes me as odd.
No, the decline had started prior to Enterprise releasing, by the numbers.Are you joking? The Berman era was the most successful era of Star Trek! The so called decline was to be expected after 25 seasons and was mostly due to the supid idea of making a prequel. However, I would still take any given episode of Enterprise over a season of Discovery.
So, expanding the market is always a good idea, not repeating a product that was already done.
One doesn't preclude the other. Both appear to have success. Which is what I want in the market-variety, not monotony.The fact remains that The Orville is hugely successful, especially in Trek fandom. Kurtzman Trek on the other hand has failed to deliver any Star Trek feeling whatsoever, despite endless self referencing.
Are you joking? The Berman era was the most successful era of Star Trek! The so called decline was to be expected after 25 seasons and was mostly due to the supid idea of making a prequel.
That is exactly what is wanted is to resurrect the dead. To reclaim the glory of the past.Will you listen to yourself?
You would prefer to try to resuscitate the dead rather than bring in someone new!
Why NOT do a prequel? What's wrong with seeing how the Federation began?
And when Q has a problem, if no one else can help, and if he can find them, maybe he can hire... the A-Team.
No, no, no, no, no - everyone knows that it originated with the Orville - the one true successor to GRs dream.As I believe was already described in detail upthread, "The Road Not Taken" references a Robert Frost poem...it goes back a lot farther than The Orville.
The road not taken is Picard backing down from working harder to save the Romulans. This cascades into a more militant Starfleet.
I'm not sure I like the message that seems to be sending. Picard succeeds in saving the Romulans and this results in a fascist Federation/militant Starfleet? So, by taking in the Romulans, the Federation lost its way, and has turned evil and wrong? Sound like Nationalist propaganda to me.Wouldn't actually succeeding in saving the Romulans, or at least working harder for it, be more likely to do that?
Tapestry wasn't about time travel per se, but rather a look at Picard's younger life.Remember another revered episode from TNG, Tapestry?
It was about Q and Timetravel.
Maybe not "evil" but Yesterday's Enterprise showed a darker take on the TNG characters, Starfleet and the Federation.You know, one thing that was always missing from TNG was that TNG was the only classic Trek show that never had an episode with the evil versions of the characters/evil Federation.
All we know of the season so far is a very brief teaser trailer designed to pique our interest in the new story that is to be told. We have absolutely no way of knowing whether or not the events of season one will be addressed or to what extent. We certainly don't know enough to say that it will definitely be swept under the carpet and forgotten about.TThe first season appears largely forgotten.
Thus the modifier "appears.,"All we know of the season so far is a very brief teaser trailer designed to pique our interest in the new story that is to be told. We have absolutely no way of knowing whether or not the events of season one will be addressed or to what extent. We certainly don't know enough to say that it will definitely be swept under the carpet and forgotten about.
I'm not sure I like the message that seems to be sending. Picard succeeds in saving the Romulans and this results in a fascist Federation/militant Starfleet? So, by taking in the Romulans, the Federation lost its way, and has turned evil and wrong?
Sound like Nationalist propaganda to me.
![]()
I think it's deliberate: note that Picard is also wearing *four-pip* versions of the updated "trapezoid"-shaped admiral rank bars and we haven't seen those on-screen before so they're NEW for this season. It was pretty obvious that they would exist between Clancy's five-pip version and Oh's single-pip but they weren't in S1.
Why don't we combine elements from the most revered episodes from TNG, a sort of best of, and make that the center of the second Picard season?
How creative! How imaginative! How exciting! Screw exploration! Screw strange new worlds.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.