I tend to agree. The last third is very much a struggle.Controversial Opinion:
"Charlie X" is a tough watch. That doesn't mean it's not good...but maybe just that I don't find it traditionally "enjoyable"
It kind of reminds me of a typical "Black Mirror" episode. It's well acted, well produced, and well written....but it's just uncomfortable and disturbing. And I've always kind of hated Charlie....like "why didn't they just beam him into space" hate. So, I think the fact that I never found him to be tragic / sympathetic doesn't help me.I tend to agree. The last third is very much a struggle.
Yeah, it shifts from sympathy from Charlie really really quickly, especially once the Antares was blown up.It kind of reminds me of a typical "Black Mirror" episode. It's well acted, well produced, and well written....but it's just uncomfortable and disturbing. And I've always kind of hated Charlie....like "why didn't they just beam him into space" hate. So, I think the fact that I never found him to be tragic / sympathetic doesn't help me.
Yeah, it shifts from sympathy from Charlie really really quickly, especially once the Antares was blown up.
The Thasians gave Charlie superpowers so he could survive, but he never had the chance to be raised and socialized with other humans so he doesn't have any filters. He's a sympathetic and ultimately tragic figure because his situation isn't of his own making.Yeah, and the whole thing about how he lusts for Rand is SUUUUUUUUPER uncomfortable and unsympathetic as well. That scene where he enters her quarters and says all that stuff about being "hungry".....EEEEEHHHHGHGHGHHHHH.
And I'm not being overly-dramatic....it creeps me out that much.
caught a TNG repeat tonight…
Reg Barclay was a terrible character and shouldn’t have been brought back after that first episode, let alone be shoehorned into the last two seasons of Voyager.
Personally, I like Barclay, he's the only one on board the Enterprise that behaves like a real human being!!! Which makes him the most relatable character of the series.
Charlie X is obviously inspired by a twilight zone episode where a kid has godlike powers and imposes a horrible dictatorship on a small community.
The episode is called "It's a good life" and was released in 1961.
That isn't mentioned in The Making of Star Trek. Maybe it's from one of the umpteen other behind-the-scenes Trek books.As I remember, The Making of Star Trek contains several story ideas which were part of a pitch for the series Star Trek, and it is believed that "Charlie X" is based on one of them which I think was Called "When Charlie Becomes a God".
From Memory AlphaThat isn't mentioned in The Making of Star Trek. Maybe it's from one of the umpteen other behind-the-scenes Trek books.
- Gene Roddenberry had written a one-sentence synopsis of this episode on the first page of his original series outline for Star Trek under the title "The Day Charlie Became God." The page is reproduced in the Herbert F. Solow/Robert H. Justman volume Inside Star Trek: The Real Story [page number? • edit]. Writer Dorothy Fontana also confirmed that the episode was based on that story idea. Fontana developed the story and wrote the teleplay, but Roddenberry received story credit. [1]
From Memory Alpha
Star Trek Pitch - March 11 1964 said:THE DAY CHARLIE BECAME GOD. The accidental
occurrence of infinite power to do all things,
in the hands of a very finite man.
From the Original Pitch itself (Page 1):
Sandwiched right between "The Next Cage" (The Cage/The Menagerie) and "President Capone" (A Piece of the Action), and it's interesting how many of the one-sentence pitches became fully fleshed out episodes.
Most TOS episodes can be summed up in one sentence or less.
Deadly garden of Eden
The Greek gods were aliens
Aliens stole Spock's brain...
Modern Roman gladiators
300-year-old children
Genetic augments from the past
Alien Nazis
.....
Not really controversial (or maybe it is) but I think TNG is overrated, because:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.