• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Q's presence in "Picard" will be very interesting. He's best as a comic character, so either PIC will have to pick up a lighter tone, or Q will have to get very doom and gloom.

I was really disappointed with his appearance in Lower Decks. Q is a larger-than-life antagonist, literally the most powerful entity in all of Star Trek. He's a comic character, I get it, but in Lower Decks he was treated as a nuisance and not a threat.

In TNG, when Q appeared, that was a once-a-season event that pulled up red flags for everybody. He was fascinated by Picard and the Enterprise, but I didn't get the impression that he ventured out much more beyond that (his appearances on DS9 and Voyager being natural progressions from them stumbling onto Vash and Quinn).

In Lower Decks, we are expected to believe that he has been pestering this minor ship and even its most minor crewmembers on a persistent basis. Maybe if the Cerritos was a flagship of the Federation, we could be more understandable. But they're explicitly not. So, that leads me to believe that he's been pestering thousands of starships and millions of crewmembers all across the Federation (and beyond). Which he can do, it's in his power, but it lessens the threat assessment and eventfulness of a Q appearance considerably.

I think Lower Decks made an error with his appearance in their search for good parody. I love the show, but that is one of the two major missteps I felt they made in their first season.

Alternatively, Q only messes around with the protagonists of the TV series, which is a fun fourth wall break that he does allude to occasionally, but tends to break the immersion on my end.

Q belongs on Picard, because he is intricately tied into Picard's journey and through the "never-ending trial". I really could've gone all of Lower Decks without seeing Q. Maybe another Q (or even Q Junior) who gets fascinated with Mariner. Or maybe he could be pestering Riker on the Titan in their upcoming second season. Or maybe a natural evolution of his trial on humanity if the Cerritos ran across something or someone of value to the Q (a la Vash).
 
I guess you don't like Harlan Ellison. He certainly doesn't strike me as a Star Trek type.

It had his name on it. It was not the script he wrote. At least he thought it good enough he did not "Cordwayner Bird" it.

Personally I think his writing more than on the dark side. He was not a writer of optimistic futures. As a person he was an ass, plain and simple.
 
Apparently and at some point after 2164 Starfleet uniforms lost pockets for decades. There are none on the U.S.S. Kelvin uniforms of 2233 nor in "The Cage(TOS)," and it appears the DSC iterations might be just a blip and not a sign of any trend.

By TOS they're gone again except for maybe engineering and medical jumpsuits.
 
In fact only one other living being witnessed either. Jean-Luc Picard, a man who wouldn't even be born until almost 12 years after Kirk's first recorded death. That's pretty close to being alone.
That must be why Kirk's line was "I've always known when I die, I'll die pretty close to alone."
Heinlein's authorized bio states that he'd just been through a plagiarism lawsuit and he caved on "Tribbles" only because he figured it was a one-time thing and would be forgotten. He considered the ongoing merchandising of them to a betrayal of the gentleman's agreement he made with Coon. (LINK)
Proof that science fiction writers are not infallible at predicting the future. ;)

Looking forward to your investigation on this, Maurice!
The A-Team is literally the same episode every single week.

  • Episode Opens with the team narrowly escaping that guy who chases them
  • One member of the team finds a group of innocent people who are being harassed by some bad guys
  • Team reluctantly decides they need to help innocent people, despite the risks and reservations
  • Team needs to break Reginald Barcaly out of a mental health institution through silly hijynx
  • Team needs to get Clubber Lang onto a plane by drugging his milk
  • Lt. Starbuck needs to charm some female guest character to achieve some random goal
  • Team designs non-lethal defenses to thwart a final attack by the bad guys, who have been antagonized into action
  • Team fires 859,000 rounds and detonates 20 megatons of TNT to scare off bad guys...no deaths or injuries. Team also fires rotten tomatoes and heads of lettuce at bad guys...because it's non-lethal and funny.
  • Hannibal refuses payment for what the team did...."It was all for the kids"
  • Team narrowly escapes as guys who chase them show up at the very end.
  • Roll credits
This honestly makes me want to watch a few episodes of The A-Team right now. :techman:
It had his name on it. It was not the script he wrote. At least he thought it good enough he did not "Cordwayner Bird" it.
Ellison wanted to put his "Cordwainer Bird" pseudonym on COTEOF, but Roddenberry talked him out of it. I think GR threatened to badmouth him in the television industry, IIRC.
 
The A-Team is literally the same episode every single week.

I remember the A Team very little. It's on the Roku channel, might check it out.

I think the Hulk was basically the same episode over and over too.

And you could set your watch by the big alarm on Emergency where they'd all have to rush out to the big refinery fire. Man, that must have been an expensive show.

ANYway, I know I've referred to it before, but I wish I could find the essay about the joys of "stupid" TV that is non-taxing and the characters don't really grow, or not much. Adam 12, y'know. The world is taxing enough, give me TV to veg out to. That was a trouble I had w/ Picard . . . so convoluted a plot. (I know, I know it's a novel, and I'm too stupid to remember what happened three weeks ago with some plot within a conspiracy, etc. etc.)

My wife and I watch a TNG every Fri with lunch. Turn it on, watch the show, forget it. Life is good.
 
My controversial opinion. Picard isn't really very difficult to follow at all. My wife who's never seen a shred of Star Trek before Picard could get it. The Falcon and the Winter Soldier however... hoo boy!

Picard is child's play, unless you expected it to be just like 80's TNG. Otherwise, it's no different than something like Breaking Bad or Walking Dead...yes it's serialized, but it isn't particularly over-complicated.

Christopher Nolan's Tenet is "hard to follow".....not PIC.
 
I do not get vegg
ANYway, I know I've referred to it before, but I wish I could find the essay about the joys of "stupid" TV that is non-taxing and the characters don't really grow, or not much.
I wish you could find it too. I find vegging to be such a foreign concept when it comes to TV. I want to have characters that I can connect with and grow, even a little bit. Even MASH, my go to relaxing type show, have some growth in it.

Maybe its a definition of terms but vegging just is weird to me. At least with shows.
 
I remember the A Team very little. It's on the Roku channel, might check it out.

I think the Hulk was basically the same episode over and over too.

While I never watched the Hulk, the son of our neighbors (a few years older than me) according to him basically had figured out down to the minute when he would become his green self ('twice per episode, first time at 19.42 pm, second time at 19.58' or something like that).

As for the A-team, that series was aimed at children, and for that group such repetition isn't necessarily a bad thing (provided it's done well, of course).


I do not get vegg

I wish you could find it too. I find vegging to be such a foreign concept when it comes to TV. I want to have characters that I can connect with and grow, even a little bit. Even MASH, my go to relaxing type show, have some growth in it.

Maybe its a definition of terms but vegging just is weird to me. At least with shows.
'
I think I do both, depending on how much energy I have. normally, I'd like to relate to characters the way you describe. If I'm very tired however (the type of tired you know you really should go to bed, but you can't bring yourself to do even that) 'vegging' is what I do. Under those circumstances, I even prefer things I've already seen a hundred times.
 
Last edited:
I think I do both, depending on how much energy I have. normally, I'd like to relate to characters the way you describe. If I'm very tired however (the type of tired you know you really should go to bed, but you can't bring yourself to do even that) 'vegging' is what I
Yeah, I guess I suppose so. I guess I use podcasts for that.
 
Me and my wife still feel angry at the time we wasted watching that movie. It’s not hard to follow, it’s hard to care because it’s shit.

1axfb7.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top