• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Space Sweepers on Netflix

ITDUDE

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Netflix app pushed this ad to me. Seems like it's going to be a lot of fun! It's South Korean, so probably need to brush up on my k-pop. Anyone know anything more about it?
I feel like I need to get more into Asian Sci-Fi. I am also really enjoying Japanese Alice in Borderland
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Netflix app pushed this ad to me. Seems like it's going to be a lot of fun! It's South Korean, so probably need to brush up on my k-pop. Anyone know anything more about it?
I feel like I need to get more into Asian Sci-Fi. I am also really enjoying Japanese Alice in Borderland
Looks like "The Expanse" meets "Guardians Of The Galaxy" ;)
(Piqued my interest though)
 
I saw the trailer for this a couple months ago, looks like it could be a lot of fun.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Just saw the full trailer. I’m honestly excited for this! K-SciFi! Let’s do it!
 
Yeah, the new trailer got me even more excited for this. Looks like it could be a lot of fun.
 
Has anyone watched this yet? I just finished it and thought it was pretty good. It's nothing deep and certainly not hard sci-fi, but that's not what I was looking for.
The effects are really good considering the budget. My only issue with the look of the movie is that its kind of generic. None of the ships have unique designs inside or out.
I found the main characters to be enjoyable, especially Tiger and Bubs. The biggest letdown would be the villain who was very one-note and his motivation was something we've seen a thousand times before.
Overall, a fun popcorn movie. If Netflix decided to pour some money into turning it into a regular series, I'd be on board.
 
So...would this be OK for a 10 year old to see ?

I saw the commercial and was interested. The parental ratings on Netflix are misleading. THE K DRAMA Run On is rated TV MA, by at " worst it is TV. 14, and most times PG
 
So...would this be OK for a 10 year old to see ?

I saw the commercial and was interested. The parental ratings on Netflix are misleading. THE K DRAMA Run On is rated TV MA, by at " worst it is TV. 14, and most times PG
Depends on the kid I suppose. There are quite a few F-bombs and some violent moments.
 
As to appropriateness, I don’t remember the language and I watched it in Korean so that might be a factor but I’d say it was a PG-13 movie for the most part IMO. The characters may appeal to a young viewer and there’s young characters they may relate to. It’s not violence free though as mentioned.

I thought it was pretty decent and some of the FX reminded me a bit of The Expanse. I thought it was decently solid especially for an Asian popcorn sci-fi movie as they tend to be pretty loose favoring entertainment vs making sense sometimes. I liked the characters which is something that also gets lost in the shuffle with these as well.
 
Last edited:
I watched this last night on a lark. Went in with zero expectations and was mildly surprised. VFX was decent and the story was entertaining enough. I was left with the impression of 'live action Manga'. A bit confusing at times and a bit convoluted, especially at the end. 7.0/10
 
This was a really fun movie, though I preferred the first half, which felt like Cowboy Bebop, to the second half, which felt like a very well-done but incredibly over-the-top ’80s action movie. Some of the story choices were so melodramatic as to be utterly ridiculous, like the scale of the threat behind Sullivan’s plan and the larger-than-life, Sullivan-connected backstories these working-stiff protagonists were suddenly revealed to have midway through. They kind of pulled me out of what was otherwise a very entertaining story.

But the second half was still pretty good, and it had some standout moments. I loved the bit with Bubs harpoon-hopping between the drones, animated with a spindly limberness that evoked Lupin the Third. That was a lot more fresh and interesting than just the umpteenth sci-fi movie sequence of spaceships firing blobs of light at each other and swooping through cluttered industrial obstacle courses. And the big shocking twist at the climactic moment was really well-done and left my jaw on the floor.

Though don’t get me started on the scientific inanities like “krypton waves” and a “Lagrangian” debris swarm that’s just minutes away from Earth orbit instead of the same distance as the Sun. Or the whole “nanobots are magic” thing, but that’s pretty commonplace in sci-fi.

I love the way languages were handled, this marvelously polyglot culture where everyone has a translator in their ear and they all speak their own languages. I particularly like that the translators even handled the English creole that Karum spoke, treating it as a valid dialect in its own right along with all the other languages. I've seen people talking about watching the English dub, and I think that's a terrible waste. The multilingual culture is a wonderful bit of worldbuilding texture, and a lot of the characters are speaking English anyway. And there are parts where language differences are specifically mentioned, like when the characters are surprised to learn that “Dorothy” speaks Korean after haltingly trying to address her in English, or the part where Tae-ho addresses his contact in Spanish but then they finally figure out he’s Korean, and when they meet, they tell him just to speak Korean from then on. Does the English dub even acknowledge those lines?

I did notice an odd continuity error — in the scene where the dance club was attacked, the crew were calling out “Kot-nim!” trying to find the kid, even though she didn’t tell them that was her real name until the next scene. I wondered if the scenes were reversed in order in editing, but I don’t see how they could be, since the latter scene had them discussing the aftermath of the former scene.

Is anyone familiar with Korean transliteration? It seemed to me that the names “Kot-nim” and “Bubs” in the subtitles didn’t quite match what the actors were actually saying. The former sounded more like “Got-nimu” and the later like maybe “Bubu” or “Puppu” or something. I’m curious what the exact phonetics actually were.


I was left with the impression of 'live action Manga'.

Since it's Korean, it would be manhwa.
 
Kot-nim I think was what was said, as how it was spelled?? No idea, watched English Dub. They did do some subtitles for the different crews like German etc. instead of dubbing everybody. But true, you loose a bit to dubbing.

As for the Lagrange debris, may have been the Earth/moon lagrage points, probably the one between the moon and Earth ( there are 5, between moon/Earth, past the moon, opposite side of the earth from the moon, 1 trailing moon orbit, 1 ahead of the moon orbit)

as for kids? Up to you, I'd clasify it as pg-13, some language, some violence, but nothing more than an avengers movie.
 
Kot-nim I think was what was said, as how it was spelled?? No idea, watched English Dub.

The subtitles said Kot-nim, and I'm sure that's how the English dubbers approximated it, but I'm talking about the original Korean.

By the way, how did the dub explain her name? I saw a review from somone who thought that her name was Dorothy and Kot-nim was her "nickname," but it was actually her real Korean name and Dorothy was just her Anglicized name, which was only really used by the media and the bad guys. So I'm wondering if the nickname misconception came from the dubbed dialogue.


As for the Lagrange debris, may have been the Earth/moon lagrage points, probably the one between the moon and Earth ( there are 5, between moon/Earth, past the moon, opposite side of the earth from the moon, 1 trailing moon orbit, 1 ahead of the moon orbit)

Good point -- I'm embarrassed I didn't think of that -- but it still doesn't cut it. Only the L4 and L5 points would concentrate matter, since the other three are unstable (like the top of a hill instead of the bottom of a basin). And the Earth-Moon L4 and L5 would be as far from Earth as the Moon is, probably a couple of days' travel. Plus, of course, the magnitude of the concentration was greatly exaggerated.


as for kids? Up to you, I'd clasify it as pg-13, some language, some violence, but nothing more than an avengers movie.

There were enough F-words that it would earn an R rating. But the violence was surprisingly subdued, with gore mostly offscreen or obscured by dim lighting. I've seen more graphic stuff on commercial television. And there's a central child character and some rather juvenile humor, so it feels like it was made with younger audiences in mind, language aside.
 
I liked it. A definite 7 out of 10
The “science” part of sci-fi is over the top silly sometimes. (Bullet proof ship, engine room from locomotive that needs extra fuel, magic nanopobes... oh and Gravity (or acknowledgment of its lack there off)) It’s not even close to The Expanse in that regard. Idea that all tech featured would be possible by 2092 is ridiculous, 2192 maybe. And what’s with main bad guy who was born in 1940?
But anyway, all that relatively minor stuff in otherwise fun movie. Liked how they handled languages, space fights scenes were relatively easy to follow (hmm maybe because they didn’t use a stupid blue hue everywhere. You know what I’m talking about). Ship designs we’re all different (Picard, this time I’m looking at you)
Definitely they gave a lot of universe building backstory, perhaps planning for movie series or perhaps a TV series?
And another top character role that goes to a robot. A tradition going back a very long time (Big Hero 6, Rogue One, Wall-E, Short Circuit, Batteries Not Included... and probably many more)
Overall, not a bad flick :techman:
 
The “science” part of sci-fi is over the top silly sometimes. (Bullet proof ship, engine room from locomotive that needs extra fuel, magic nanopobes...

Spaceships would absolutely be bulletproof, because they have to be micrometeorite-proof. Spacesuits are bulletproof too.

https://worldbuilding.stackexchange...he-old-gun-on-a-spaceship-problem/58073#58073
Our current micrometeorite shielding can protect against the energies of bullets at point blank range, by several times. An aluminium slug of 7mm at 7kms can be stopped by whipple shields. That's a kinetic energy of ~36kJ. A handgun bullet at point blank range is more like ~8kJ. (http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/1233/04Dec_Kalinski.pdf?sequence=1) The whipple shield is composed of an outer bumper layer, which fragments the projectile before it hits the hull, so is directional and assuming that projectiles are coming from outside (how naive!). So maybe it's not impossible to puncture the hull from the inside out with high powered weapons. But keep in mind this is using current day shielding technology too, and not the new fancy self-healing hulls which are being worked on. Perhaps micrometeorite shielding is more advanced on the OPs interplanetary spacecraft, making onboard gunfire safe, in a depressurization risk sense :)

Plus, of course, the specific job of these ships was to clean up orbital debris, and that would definitely require being well-armored against high-velocity microprojectiles.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top