Honestly, as you note, I am trying to figure out how to do without making it too magical. But, unfortunately, I think it gets to the point that it is so unbelievable it makes any problems seem ridiculous that they can't solve them.Obviously it's just a personal observation and technology could well have plateaued after the 24th century, but somehow I'd have thought a thousand years into the future would have felt a bit more...futuristic?
Well, too much technology, kills technology.
If discovery were like Vikings in WWII, they'd be useless!! They need to give them a fighting chance.
IMO in the 32nd century, they should all be energy beings with the ability to take any form they want, not to mention being immortal.
A 900 year comparison between today and the past is unfair because the rate of the current technological progress is unique in human history.
If you compare an ancient Greek vessel from 400 BCE and a Roman ship from 500 CE there's practically no difference.
I imagine a rate of progress between the 23rd and 32nd centuries more akin to the 400 BCE - 500 CE rate, than between the 12th and 21st centuries.
It is, which is why adding more to it is quite difficult. @eschaton has some interesting ideas with the transhumanist elements but even those don't feel very Trek like in their approach. So, at some point in time technology is going to slow down in development, where steps are more incremental, but still look familiar. I mean, my smart phone I had 3 years ago looks the same as the one I have now. Tech grows, but can look the same.But surely Star Trek technology is virtually magic already? People appear and disappear out of thin air, as does food and drink. Inertial dampers, gravity plating, shields, warp drives?
Why is only “active” dylithium affected? What is the difference between active/inactive dylithium anyway?
ALL dilithium within range of the Burn (whether or not it was installed in a ship's engine) went inert. The ships that were destroyed, were because their warp cores were online and working. And since dilithium regulates a ship's M/AM reaction, those ships lost antimatter containment and thus...BOOM.
But the engineers on Discovery saw the instability and we're able to shutdown.
It wasn't an instant thing, like it was implied before.
I think also not well explained was, that shutting down warp-drive wasn't enough, but they had to reroute power, and shutdown the cloak, to do what?
Maintain forcefields prevent AM from reacting? But why extra power?
Anyway, just so many 'conveniences'
Remember in Voyager when Braxton's shuttlecraft was able to do pretty much whatever it wanted to Voyager?I completely agree that future FUTURE technology is a hard thing to portray without it being virtually akin to magic, but speaking personally I don't see the galaxy of nearly a thousand years in the future as drastically different technology-wise than what I've observed before - transporters, shields, phasers and torpedoes, holograms, ships needing dilithium for their warp drives. Honestly if they'd said they'd jumped fifty years beyond the Picard era I'd have had no qualms believing the level of technology shown in this season of Discovery.
When Discovery was at Earth it shrugged off a 32nd century torpedo hit with its 23rd century shields. I'd have imagined this would have been like a Viking longboat going toe-toe-toe with a modern Navy destroyer.
Obviously it's just a personal observation and technology could well have plateaued after the 24th century, but somehow I'd have thought a thousand years into the future would have felt a bit more...futuristic?
Remember in Voyager when Braxton's shuttlecraft was able to do pretty much whatever it wanted to Voyager?
I do yeah. And that was 500 years difference. Discovery is now looking at 930 years.Remember in Voyager when Braxton's shuttlecraft was able to do pretty much whatever it wanted to Voyager?
By which you mean the shuttlecraft knocked out voyager's shields with a single shot of it's weapon, which was noted to be a subatomic disrupters not a phaser.Not really. Voyager defeated it with a burst of technobabble and sent it into a time vortex.
Yup, the Discovery Writers really need someone both versed in canon and critical thinking on their team who can over ride them when they start just throwing stuff out that makes no sense within the larger setting that is Star Trek.I do yeah. And that was 500 years difference. Discovery is now looking at 930 years.
By which you mean the shuttlecraft knocked out voyager's shields with a single shot of it's weapon, which was noted to be a subatomic disrupters not a phaser.
Also the vessels shields were immune to phasers.
....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.