please go back and tell me where i criticized Georgiu’s arc here? In fact I lauded it last week.
My sarcastic comment about general knee jerk reactionism against Georgiou was not directed at anyone.
People could stop assuming they know "why" people think or say what they do.
E.g., "People who don't like X are just ppl who don't like DSC." You don't know that. It's hard enough to know ourselves, why we do something or like or dislike things.
All my $.02. from someone who wants to like this show, so don't tell me I am a hater because I find some things lacking.
This is my $.05 (since it's probably a bit more than 2 cents). I don't assume much about anyone person. I am, by my own admission, a sarcastic, flippant, and sometimes irreverent, commentator. I make jokes around general ideas of people not liking Discovery. But, for those, like you (among so many others here) who don't like it I appreciate that you have your reasons I think that most of you have been far kinder to Discovery in sticking around because it's clear that it isn't enjoyable-at all.
I appreciate that, but, I do not understand it. Which is why your explanations are helpful.
This story is a reminder.
Human monsters are still both human and monsters...and they can still learn. The Emperor Emerita got lucky in terms of the teachers who chose themselves as such for her. Very lucky indeed...
Well put. And I think that is always the danger, especially with people we vehemently disagree with and see as monstrous-they are still humans.
I don't think it's about this. It's that her rehabilitation was, we are told, a pretty dramatic one and we only saw bits and pieces of it. I know it's a victim of shorter seasons in this era but all we basically saw was her being literally worse than Hitler, then she feels some emotions a few times and does a couple of helpful things, and then everyone is telling us she isn't worse than Hitler any more. That's it. Sympathizing with villains or antiheroes is fine but there needs to be care in how it's presented and this was a bit slapdash.
I mean, I don't see it that way in terms of slapdash. I thought the whole point of this episode was to highlight just how much Georgiou had changed despite her protestations to Prime Michael to the contrary. That she needed to revisit the MU in order to see just how much she was different from where she came.
I don't think she is fully redeemed, but I think she is on the path to become that rehabilitated person as an on going learning process. And, I think that the MU highlights this because, unlike Hitler, Georgiou was never shown another way. The morality of the MU was survival of the strong, in a way similar to Sparta. Georgiou has now been shown another way and it has changed her.
For me, that is the essence of Star Trek-the ability of the human being to become better.
Mileage will vary.