Energy of the Daleks was okay, though anything would be an anticlimax after the last one. I never really thought about the fact that Leela didn't meet the Daleks onscreen, so this is a chance to put them together, although more could've been done with it than we got. As they pointed out in the mini-documentary, this is also the first traditional, Davros-less Dalek story for Tom Baker. That made it kind of routine, okay but not a standout in any way beyond those technical milestones.
Apparently this was the first one they recorded in the series, and that creates a continuity error, where Leela sees the security guards/Robomen on horseback and says "They come on beasts" or something to that effect, even though this is narratively right after The Wrath of the Iceni, in which she saw plenty of horses and rode one or two.
It was cute that Nicholas Briggs wrote the story around the idea that if the Moon didn't exist, the Earth's axis would be unstable and the climate would change too frequently to be amenable to life, but he exaggerated it; it's more an instability over millions of years affecting the probability of higher life having the chance to evolve eventually, rather than the swift global cataclysm he portrayed it as. It also seems overly convoluted as a destroy-the-Earth strategy. If the plan relied on beaming enough energy to Earth to create an antigravity force field to repel the Moon, then surely they could've just beamed that energy to Earth in order to vaporize the surface.
In fact, come to think of it, nullifying Earth's gravity wouldn't just set the Moon free, it'd set the atmosphere free as well, and you could destroy humanity that way. Plus it would cut the Earth free from its orbit around the Sun, which would also destroy humanity. So the effect actually would have been a lot more immediate than the whole unstable-axis thing.
Hmm... It's a shame that a story about a plot to eject the Moon from its orbit had to be set in 2025 instead of, oh, 1999...
Apparently this was the first one they recorded in the series, and that creates a continuity error, where Leela sees the security guards/Robomen on horseback and says "They come on beasts" or something to that effect, even though this is narratively right after The Wrath of the Iceni, in which she saw plenty of horses and rode one or two.
It was cute that Nicholas Briggs wrote the story around the idea that if the Moon didn't exist, the Earth's axis would be unstable and the climate would change too frequently to be amenable to life, but he exaggerated it; it's more an instability over millions of years affecting the probability of higher life having the chance to evolve eventually, rather than the swift global cataclysm he portrayed it as. It also seems overly convoluted as a destroy-the-Earth strategy. If the plan relied on beaming enough energy to Earth to create an antigravity force field to repel the Moon, then surely they could've just beamed that energy to Earth in order to vaporize the surface.
In fact, come to think of it, nullifying Earth's gravity wouldn't just set the Moon free, it'd set the atmosphere free as well, and you could destroy humanity that way. Plus it would cut the Earth free from its orbit around the Sun, which would also destroy humanity. So the effect actually would have been a lot more immediate than the whole unstable-axis thing.
Hmm... It's a shame that a story about a plot to eject the Moon from its orbit had to be set in 2025 instead of, oh, 1999...
