And take anything Cushman writes with a grain of salt.
Let's "supersize" it from a "grain" of salt to a full fledged "salt lick" brick.

And take anything Cushman writes with a grain of salt.
Lecturing with Latin just sounds pretentious.Argumentum ad Populum[...]
argumentum ad antiquitatem[...]
Argumentum ad Verecundiam[...]
Snort. And when did she stop being female? And what does the then-owner being female have to do with anything?Sure. And as for "original intent," Jefferies (to its then-female owner, IIRC) called the shuttle stage prop a 3/4 scale "model."
That explains why the Shuttlecraft is 33% bigger on the inside.was told, by Jefferies, that the stage prop had been built to 3/4 scale.
He oft writes verrrrrry lengthy posts. I can't speak to his arguments because I find such posts TL;DR.I am...unfamiliar with MAGolding. Were his arguments any good?
If I may offer a suggestion, if your post seems to be running long but you feel it cannot be shortened, then separate your points from your citations and use the spoiler tag to condense the length of your post by hiding your citations. They can then be opened as needed by your audience.Weeelllll....I broke both my posts into little bitty paragraphs to avoid the "wall of text" thing. And I too certainly vary in terms of my level of interest in reading online. But as Sagan said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Thus, my documentation of hyperlight impulse.
Writing professionally for magazines you had to learn that because there are hard limits in terms of column inches. Heck, there are even limits online, for instance startrek.com gave me a hard 2000 word limit for my article on William Ware Theiss and that forced concision.Concision is a wonderful thing.
Just sayin'
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.