• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Are the Blish novelizations canon?

It was the Reeves-Stevens novels and later "In a Mirror, Darkly" (on which the Reeves-Stevenses were story editors) that put DS9's "Terran" usage for Mirror humans together with TOS's "Empire" usage and produced "Terran Empire."
Are you sure it wasn't the Okudas who did that? I don't have my older editions of the Encyclopedia to hand, but I can see on Google Books that the 1999 edition used "Terran Empire," which makes me think the 1994 or 1997 editions did, since I don't think they tended to change old entries much. That fits with my memory growing up of it being called the "Terran Empire," which feels more definitive than something I would have learned reading Spectre. I used to constantly pore over the old Omnipedia program.

It's clear from reading novels like Federation that the Reeves-Stevens were early adopters of porting Okuda assumptions/ideas from the reference books over into the novels.
 
I had the pleasure of actually meeting John Colicos once at a Toronto Trek convention. He was maybe about 5’-7” if that. He was a very pleasant man. Sadly this was about a year before he passed away.
Well, people get shorter as they age, so he was possibly closer to 5'8" when TOS was made.
 
Blish used 40 Eridani as the location of Vulcan in Star Trek 1 (1967). Specifically in his adaptation of "Balance of Terror." I believe he was first.

According to Memory Alpha, "Balance of Terror" is in Star trek 1, which was published in January, 1967. Thus it would be the earliest example of 40 Eridani as the home star of Vulcan.
 
In Trek it sounds impossible to not have the Klingons.
That is why I liked DC Comics take—the Excalbians cancelled them out.

That might still have been a nice last Blish trek novel with tech from earlier episodes used by the Feds in a prior war novel
 
Quote them or point me to them, please. :)

My copies of Gerrold's "Making of... Tribbles" book and "World of Star Trek" are in storage.

I really hesitate to use Marc Cushman as a reference but his "These Are the Voyages: TOS Season Two" is here on my unread pile, and there are Coon memo interpretations (and some direct quotes, just not for this factoid) in here. Pages 292-293 discuss that "Coon wanted to bring back John Colicos - Kor from 'Errand of Mercy'. He felt a recurring adversary for Kirk would be good for the series. But Colicos was unavailable to take the job so Coon called another actor he was fond of, and who had worked well in 'Star Trek' before."

Gerrold had just seen 'Errand of Mercy' and asked Coon (p. 288) if he could use Klingons as the hostile force. (His treatment had Joseph Mackie and a yacht.) It also mentions Janice Rand (p. 286) as being in Gerrold's first treatment. She takes the "fuzzy" from the trading post back to the Enterprise.

It was Koloth by the first full script.

This is my first time reading this book. I wish I had Gerrold's "Making of... Tribbles" book handy, as I suspect Kor does get a mention. Anyone, please? Before I tear the garage apart?

Oh, just saw this (p. 305), including quote by Campbell. "Coon had told Campbell that Koloth would become a recurring character. But the idea was discarded after Coon left the series. 'I think Roddenberry zigged when he should have zagged,' Campbell said, 'He never should have allowed the Kirk and Koloth thing to die.'"

From "Starlog #128, noted in Memory Alpha: When David Gerrold wrote the script for "The Trouble with Tribbles", he did not spell out, in the episode's dialogue, the notion of Koloth as a regular foe.

From "The Star Trek Interview Book": ... the installment's main Klingon character was initially intended to be played by Tige Andrews, though the episode couldn't be worked into his schedule. (p. 195)
 
Last edited:
Spock Must Die was a good novel but do we really believe the Klingons could hold off the Organians for one second and a transporter malfunction again? This time duplicating the entirely logical first officer of the Enterprise!!! :vulcan:
JB
 
I don’t think the transporter malfunctions in SMD. It merely worked in an unexpected manner.
 
I don’t think the transporter malfunctions in SMD. It merely worked in an unexpected manner.

Right -- IIRC, they're trying to beam through the tachyon barrier around Organia, and the barrier reflects the beam back and creates the duplicate. So it's like TNG: "Second Chances," in that the duplication is caused by a normally functioning transporter interacting unexpectedly with an anomalous planetary phenomenon.
 
My copies of Gerrold's "Making of... Tribbles" book and "World of Star Trek" are in storage.

I really hesitate to use Marc Cushman as a reference but his "These Are the Voyages: TOS Season Two" is here on my unread pile, and there are Coon memo interpretations (and some direct quotes, just not for this factoid) in here. Pages 292-293 discuss that "Coon wanted to bring back John Colicos - Kor from 'Errand of Mercy'. He felt a recurring adversary for Kirk would be good for the series. But Colicos was unavailable to take the job so Coon called another actor he was fond of, and who had worked well in 'Star Trek' before."

Gerrold had just seen 'Errand of Mercy' and asked Coon (p. 288) if he could use Klingons as the hostile force. (His treatment had Joseph Mackie and a yacht.) It also mentions Janice Rand (p. 286) as being in Gerrold's first treatment. She takes the "fuzzy" from the trading post back to the Enterprise.

It was Koloth by the first full script.

This is my first time reading this book. I wish I had Gerrold's "Making of... Tribbles" book handy, as I suspect Kor does get a mention. Anyone, please? Before I tear the garage apart?

Oh, just saw this (p. 305), including quote by Campbell. "Coon had told Campbell that Koloth would become a recurring character. But the idea was discarded after Coon left the series. 'I think Roddenberry zigged when he should have zagged,' Campbell said, 'He never should have allowed the Kirk and Koloth thing to die.'"

From "Starlog #128, noted in Memory Alpha: When David Gerrold wrote the script for "The Trouble with Tribbles", he did not spell out, in the episode's dialogue, the notion of Koloth as a regular foe.

From "The Star Trek Interview Book": ... the installment's main Klingon character was initially intended to be played by Tige Andrews, though the episode couldn't be worked into his schedule. (p. 195)

The way I understand it, probably from other threads on this board: if a character is created by the show's producer, then the show can re-use that character for free. And of course producer Gene Coon wrote "Kor" and the Klingons into existence, so Star Trek owned them outright. They could be re-used in someone else's script without paying royalties to Coon.

I don't doubt that Gerrold wanted Koloth to become Kirk's recurring antagonist, because that would require royalty payments to Gerrold for scripts he didn't write. But I think Roddenberry and Justman were never going to do that. Why pay royalties to that kid when you can just write a new Klingon?

I'd say that's at least one reason why you see Angela Teller instead of Angela Martine in "Shore Leave." The Writers' Guild might have made Star Trek give Paul Schneider ("Balance of Terror") a check for re-using Angela Martine. Note that the only way Harry Mudd came back was that the same guy wrote both scripts, so no extra payments were needed.
 
I wish I had Gerrold's "Making of... Tribbles" book handy, as I suspect Kor does get a mention.

The BenBella ebook of Gerold's TTwT doesn't have any reference to either Kor or Colicos. I don't have time to go through the Ballantine edition from 1973 (because working from home does mean I have to work today) but I tend to doubt it.

I don’t think the transporter malfunctions in SMD. It merely worked in an unexpected manner.

Well, yes and no. It's an enhanced transporter that can send a duplicate Spock across hundreds of light years to Organia using, IIRC, tachyons (the duplicate would have been "decommissioned" once it reported on conditions at Organia). But the Klingon shield around Organia reflected the duplicate back to the Enterprise's transporter. Which had been shielded, so nobody saw the duplicate Spock appear.
 
Last edited:
Back in the day my collection of James Blish adaptations along with Spock Must Die! and my first AMT Enterprise model kit were my earliest Star Trek priceless treasures.

That really reminds me of being a TOS fan in the 70s when I had The World of Star Trek, The Making of Star Trek, The Trouble with Tribbles BTS books and Foster's adaptations of TAS, along with the Blish novels and Gold Key comics (among other items). Fun time to be into Star Trek.
 
Scotty mentions he hadn’t thought of making the shield transparent wherein they would have seen the duplicate form. And it’s by pure chance the Klingon shield around Organia was an ideal tachyon mirror. Of course this adds even greater emphasis on getting to Organia to find out what the hell is going on.

The one question left unanswered is how the Klingons managed to get that shield around Organia in the first place. It does illustrate that there are some pretty smart scientists among the Klingons.

Back in the day I long thought SMD (with a different title and maybe resolution) would have made a great film.
 
I really hesitate to use Marc Cushman as a reference but his "These Are the Voyages: TOS Season Two" is here on my unread pile, and there are Coon memo interpretations (and some direct quotes, just not for this factoid) in here. Pages 292-293 discuss that "Coon wanted to bring back John Colicos - Kor from 'Errand of Mercy'. He felt a recurring adversary for Kirk would be good for the series. But Colicos was unavailable to take the job so Coon called another actor he was fond of, and who had worked well in 'Star Trek' before."

Cushman's claim in this instance is not backed up by a memo or a script reference, but I thinks he's badly paraphrasing (without citation) a claim that appears in David Gerrold's book about "The Trouble with Tribbles." Consult the following passage about a potential reappearance of Captain Koloth (page 255 of my copy, first printing, May 1973):

An interesting sidelight to this is that Gene Roddenberry had been thinking that Kirk should have a Klingon counterpart. Just as the Enterprise is assigned to a specific quadrant of the galaxy, so would a specific Klingon ship be assigned by the Klingon High Command to the same quadrant. Thus the two captains would continually find themselves confronting each other. Roddenberry had thought William Campbell as Captain Koloth might be perfect for this role. Campbell would then have become a semi-regular, appearing in every story where Kirk confronted Klingons.

Unfortunately, Campbell was not available the next time a Klingon episode was to be filmed, so another actor was hired. Later on, the idea of a continuing set of nasties was dropped or forgotten.
The next episode to feature a Klingon character was "A Private Little War." What we know about that episode is that Don Ingalls' first draft story outline featured Kor, Bob Justman complained, and starting with Ingalls' second draft story outline, the Klingon character was changed to Krell. This all happened in May of 1967, long before William Campbell was cast in the role of Koloth. No story or script for "A Private Little War" features Koloth in it, nor do I have any existing memo where including Koloth is even discussed.

Perhaps Roddenberry confused Koloth with Kor (who was slated to reappear, at various stages, in both "A Private Little War" and "Day of the Dove") when he told Gerrold this—if he told Gerrold this. Or maybe this is a flattering lie Roddenberry told to William Campbell, who was a regular poker buddy with James Doohan and Gene Roddenberry (which would help explain how they both ended up in the Roddenberry-produced Pretty Maids All In A Row), and then Campbell relayed to Gerrold. Who knows.
 
He was a "talker" to get what he needed. He badmouthed people to his advantage and sweet talked people to his advantage.

Strangely, for a man who was good at manipulation with words, he was an awkward and uncomfortable to listen to public speaker. Often leaned on cliche in his stories, and you can always tell when he's making shit up when he says things that are uniquely "Roddenberry" or puts himself in the hero spot. That's something I noticed Freiberger did as well, especially when it came to Space:1999. At least, that's my take.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top