For better or worse, that's what Schumacher tried to do.
Yeah, I think is one of the few times I actually more or less agree with you @kirk55555, the big obsession with making Batman stories darker and grittier is getting a bit annoying. I love the Nolan trilogy, but I think after them they really should have gone less dark and gritty with the next Batman movies, but they just seem to be going farther and farther in that direction.
The DCEU's Batman appearances were not as dark as the Nolan version. He was serious, but he had some moments of the armor cracking in his interactions with Wonder Woman and eventually, Clark (in Justice League). The one thing no Batman movie ever needs is overt humor for the characters and/or situations, and certainly nothing like the Schumacher films, the Brave and the Bold cartoon, or the 1966-68 TV series.
The problem with Schumacher was just that he went to far in that other direction.
My ideal would be something between the two, something that has lightness and moments of fun, but doesn't necessarily go as far into camp as Schumacher did.
I seem to remember Michael Uslan describing the old movie series as such that the first two Tim Burton films stylistically adapted the late 30s/early 40s comics, Batman Forever was stylistically based on the late 40s and 50s comics, and Batman & Robin was the adaptation of the 60s' camp style.
He did have a few moments of humor, especially in Justice League, but BvS was by far the darkest take on the character.The DCEU's Batman appearances were not as dark as the Nolan version. He was serious, but he had some moments of the armor cracking in his interactions with Wonder Woman and eventually, Clark (in Justice League). The one thing no Batman movie ever needs is overt humor for the characters and/or situations, and certainly nothing like the Schumacher films, the Brave and the Bold cartoon, or the 1966-68 TV series.
I haven't followed this super closely, why is this a bad thing? Aren't more options better?Zack Snyder’s Justice League is coming to HBO Max. The whiny fanboys won.
Again, nothing to do with the quality of either version of the film. Just the arrogance and entitlement of some fans.I haven't followed this super closely, why is this a bad thing? Aren't more options better?
Again, nothing to do with the quality of either version of the film. Just the arrogance and entitlement of some fans.
As one who never thought it would get released, I never thought it would get released theatrically or on blu-ray, and this story bears out why: it's not finished. They are having to spend $20-30 million to finish it, which they would likely not recoup theatrically. Streaming changes that equation, it's all about content to attract viewers, and $20-20 million is way less than what Netflix is spending on a lot of their movies (didn't Bright cost like $90 million?) for a theatrical level exclusive. Makes a lot of sense.Except they were right and all the people it didn't exist or would never be released were wrong.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.