They do, but if you call them that, when they respond they call you "human" (or whatever your species is) in a tone that one could swear is very mildly disdainful.For backwards compatibility they probably recognize “Computer” also.
Or they call you "dear" in a seductive female voice, just to mess with your mind.They do, but if you call them that, when they respond they call you "human" (or whatever your species is) in a tone that one could swear is very mildly disdainful.
The Enterprise-D also continuously monitors internal activity, not only because that's the only way you can have a computer respond to a prompt like "Computer" "Siri" etc but because they call up complex surveillance information on people and it's just there. The only difference between TNG and PIC is the computers are finally allowed to act on their own like the doors always did.Discovery and Picard show the computers as constantly monitoring the crew. The EMH turning itself on during times of stress, or the Discovery computer getting help when Tilly hurt herself. It's a logical extrapolation from today, but as usual with Discovery it doesn't fit with TOS and causes problems if you give it any real thought.
There's the time in TOS where the computer gets the sexy personality as an upgrade, so it might very well be that.Well, in PIC we mainly see the civilian side of life. Might be civilian computers always were treated like people, and were allowed to be smarter/smartass'er. We see basically no civilian computing in TOS or TAS.
Timo Saloniemi
Well, in PIC we mainly see the civilian side of life. Might be civilian computers always were treated like people, and were allowed to be smarter/smartass'er. We see basically no civilian computing in TOS or TAS.
Timo Saloniemi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.