The Enterprise-D computer core may have been thicker than an entire Constitution-class saucer section.
The Enterprise-D computer core may have been thicker than an entire Constitution-class saucer section.
It's not directly on top of the Galaxy Class.
There are several decks in between.
Could be, and with humanity being the leading force behind and spearheading founder of the Federation the new unified Starfleet may have decided to stick closely to United Earth designs for its starships
Real reason, Star Trek has rule guidelines for StarShip design for Federation StarShips created by Gene Roddenberry.Then perhaps being on top of the core in earlier ships is what began the design tradition. Then by the time of the Galaxy class it was unthinkable to have the Bridge not on deck 1.
I thought the Nacelles were definitely from Earth's StarFleetI always thought it was a massive missed opportunity not to have the Vulcans and Andorian designs in Enterprise contribute to the Starfleet design language. This might require a less familiar design for the NX-01. Nacelles from Earth, saucers from the Andorians, double hull concept from the Vulcans.
Imagine how much computing power it'll have when they replace the cores with bioneural gel columns.The Enterprise-D computer core may have been thicker than an entire Constitution-class saucer section.
Remember the limits of Replicators.Imagine how much computing power it'll have when they replace the cores with bioneural gel columns.
Pretty set dressing diagrams which don't mean much: Look at Voyager, where the cutaway has 2 warp cores and 2 computer cores, but episodes make it explict there is only one of each.
Voyager has more than one shuttlebay in the show, but only 1 in every diagram and ship model ever used XDPretty set dressing diagrams which don't mean much: Look at Voyager, where the cutaway has 2 warp cores and 2 computer cores, but episodes make it explict there is only one of each.
I would love for that unsightly row of lights to have a function like that, but I don't think they are the source of the blue glow (I just pulled the scene up on my tablet to take another look).
In TWOK, the Enterprise took a photon torpedo directly to the bridge without shields, and all it did was throw more sparks than usual. So, yeah, the bridge certainly doesn't seem to be very vulnerable for how exposed it is.
It's obviously not vulnerable, whatever the reason, or they and some other interstellar powers (e.g., Klingons) wouldn't be putting their bridges up there.
Real reason, Star Trek has rule guidelines for StarShip design for Federation StarShips created by Gene Roddenberry.
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/design.htm
Rule #1 Warp nacelles *must* be in pairs.
Rule #2 Warp nacelles must have at least 50% line-of-sight on each other across the hull.
Rule #3 Both warp nacelles must be fully visible from the front.
Rule #4 The bridge must be located at the top center of the primary hull.
Doesn't mean I agree with all the rules.
Here's my interpretation of Gene's rules:
Rule #1: The Warp Field Grilles must meet at some point given the 3D Warp Field lobes that protrude out, doesn't have to be pure line of sight (e.g. Intrepid Class, The Phoenix), ergo pairs of fields must interact with each other.
Rule #2: Nope, (e.g. Intrepid Class, The Phoenix) violate that. And the Borg manage to do it without having traditional nacelles.
Klingon Bird of Prey's have Warp Wings that operate on slightly different principles, but definitely aren't within line of sight of each other.
Rule #3: The Bussard Collector shouldn't be obstructed from collecting interstellar matter, the Nacelles can be wherever as long as they meet other rules.
Rule #4: Way too much IRL Naval Ship design to apply it in space. Makes little sense, especially given modern CNC are in buried bunkers behind lots of armor when in combat. And submarines are closer to what a StarShip is, ergo the Bridge should be protected and buried IMO.
Fanon time: if there are super materials windows are just fine as they can be layered just like hull materials.lso - bridge windows are stupid. (Not just the JJAbrams one - the little top one on TNG as well).
Rule #4: Way too much IRL Naval Ship design to apply it in space. Makes little sense, especially given modern CNC are in buried bunkers behind lots of armor when in combat. And submarines are closer to what a StarShip is, ergo the Bridge should be protected and buried IMO.
I'm with you on Bridge Windows, unnecessary, especially when you want to Bury the Bridge like I do =D.FANON-TIME:
It's not about where the bridge is placed. It's how well it is protected.
Material science is obviously pretty advanced (the thin TOS-nacelles keep the whole thing together). Thus it's probably more a case of how much protective layer they put around their essentials. And the bridge is protected by an extra strong layer of their super materials. And it makes sense to use that thick/super strong layer as a protection against space itself as well.
Basically, the whole bridge dome is a giant groin guard.
Yeah, you could put that inside. But there's not really any more value gained by that. Also - bridge windows are stupid. (Not just the JJAbrams one - the little top one on TNG as well).
From what I've read, converting meshes between Lightwave and Maya isn't hard, but re-applying the textures or making new ones is some extra work. So if the Picard effects team had the time to create three new sets of shuttle textures, I wonder why they did it for the Discovery shuttle instead of the way more appropriate Type 11/Insurrection model?
It is perfectly clear to me that the most secure and safest part of any Starfleet ship is the Oval Office, it has to be as we have never seen it, neither have the Romulans or Klingons.
It may be so secret that the crew don't even know where it is.![]()
You do know what I mean by "Oval Office", your response makes me think you may not?https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Calypso
This is my idea of an "Oval Office".
Imagine that as your reward for making Captain and staying "Captain" for 5 years.
You get to take that beauty on vacation to Risa on your next R&R trip.
Are you refering to the "Oval Office" within the "White House"?You do know what I mean by "Oval Office", your response makes me think you may not?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.