• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Picard Season one.... I miss Star Trek

AntonyF

Official Tahmoh Taster
Rear Admiral
This is a pure heartfelt splurge... I just had to write this. Please forgive me if it seems straying, but after finishing Picard season one it has bubbled up so much in me that I wanted to get out.

------------

There are two types of people in the world, and I’m sure you know them. Something has gone bad, or is worrying. You will have the one that will lift you up: look for the positives, acknowledge the issues, ultimately give you hope that it’ll be okay. The other – not through any malice – will drag you down. They’ll look to the negatives, analyse them, dwell on them, inflate them. They almost deal with their own anxiety through this process and placing it upon you.

Unfortunately, I feel writers in general but particularly in Star Trek are falling into the latter.

Star Trek fundamentally was about hope. That tomorrow offers a brighter future. That we will get there.

Yes, Star Trek: TNG was criticised for being anodyne and lacking conflict. But guess what? It was hugely, hugely popular. Undoubtedly the most profitable show for the studio.

It almost seems a distant memory that this faltering show found its legs in season three, became a cultural phenomenon and spawned two spin offs and a movie franchise.

Deep Space Nine demonstrated perfectly that you could muddy it up, give it rougher edges, be less perfect yet still deliver a highly entertaining and uplifting show. It’s hard to rationalise, I admit, that a show ravaged by a devastating war could still ultimately be a positive show. But I think that was because at its heart its characters were good, and despite knocks we had found our way as a species. That even the external main characters were fundamentally decent. Quark is a toad, but he’d have your back as he’s a good person.

Star Trek in its roots was a show that positively influenced the lives of so many. From Whoopi Goldberg inspired by Uhura on the bridge to go into acting, to Mae C. Jemison who was inspired to go into space by this show. Countless actor interviews will tell you about people inspired to go and be doctors and scientists and all sorts.

For me personally, I’m nowhere near as notable as them but TNG had a huge impact on me. Huge. It shaped who I am and it got me into website design (my first Star Trek site in 1997, aging myself there!) which in turn shaped my career and connected me with friends that I know decades later.

What upsets me is that there is nothing really like that today. It’s as if the writers of Star Trek now – the ones who grew up and benefited from the Star Trek of old – are being selfish.

They want to take that childhood toy, and make it theirs. They don’t want to share. They want to update it and modernise it and make it more edgy because they want an adult Star Trek. They also let their own fears and insecurities manifest through this work.

I know TV changes over time and modernises. Voyager is not TOS. But Voyager has much more of TOS in its DNA than Discovery and Picard do now from Voyager.

It starts off with the obvious. Swearing. And graphic violence. There is part of me as an adult that thinks admirals swearing at others is reasonably believable. Humans are not robots. They are emotive. People shouldn’t be perfect automatons. But… is it necessary in Star Trek? Is it necessary to have Icheb being mutilated and killed in such a graphic way? Does that Admiral need to say fuck? I just don’t think it is.

I’ve held the suspicion for a while that as writers steal Star Trek from being a family show, they are also manifesting their fears. After 9/11 the American psyche – at least from my perspective as a TV viewer – seemed to shift. And that fear and anxiety still runs through as an undercurrent.

You’re not a “proper” show now if you don’t have dark, brooding menace and characters that either want to cut their wrists or cut other people.

Yes a lot of shit is going down. But it always was. TOS launched just 21 years after the end of world war two which tens of millions dead. To put that in context, that’s the same gap since Deep Space Nine stopped airing to us now.

It started four years after the Cuban Missile Crisis. Three years after the assignation of JFK. It was against the backdrop of the cold war. The fears were very much present.

Yet those writers went out and wrote something that inspired Whoopi and Mae and gave us some inkling that tomorrow would be better. We have to work for it, it won’t be perfect, but there is hope. They posed danger in most episodes, but the show ultimately had a good crew that were evolved and positive and exploring and learning. The writers almost had a self imposed duty that they upheld even as the world seemed like it was perilously close to the end (sound familiar?)

I get none of that with Star Trek now. Picard was by far a terrible show. I enjoyed quite a bit of it. There were some nice speeches. I feel some of my feelings of Discovery are certainly seeping into this ‘essay’.

But where is that show that the nine year old can watch and be inspired? To poke around that star and see what’s out there?

Now it’s just angst and danger. Unrelenting danger. Episode after episode. The Federation is corrupt. Our hero has been fired. People drink and take drugs and swear and exploit each other. No one is exploring or dare I say ‘boldly going’. We naval gaze instead.

And that’s what upsets me most… that the writers have taken Star Trek that they enjoyed and basically made it an adults only club. There is no attempt to life people up.

I feel the end episode of Picard is entirely fitting. They have taken new shows, and put Star Trek on it and hope that it passes for Star Trek. But it isn’t, really. It may look like it and talk like it, but it’s not it.

Which is appropriate as they have killed off the beloved Jean Luc Picard and copied his mind to an imitation that they’ll label Picard. I am distraught. Not just that they killed Picard, but that they are clearly going to market a Xerox in his place. They’re all making out without a care in the world while Picard’s corpse cools back on the planet without any of his beloved crew that formed his family.

The Picard that I assumed had Irumodic Syndrome. That was the Picard we saw in the future from All Good Things… that if he meets Beverly Crusher she will chastise and care for him like she did then. Because he’s an infallible human, with a health condition. That has the scars from the Borg implants. And the artificial heart, that was from his fight with a Nausican. That Doctor Pulaski fixed to save his life. The mouth that blew the Ressikan flute from a dead civilisation, then kissed Nella Darren.

Now? Nope. Fixed that. No problem. All gone. You’ll live a decent life now, guaranteed. No ailments, no history. And by you, I mean a copy of your mind.

What a gross abuse of one of Star Trek’s greatest characters.

I feel in these times, more than ever, we need that positive Star Trek again. Yes it may be slightly rose-coloured glasses, but we need some rose colour. And that’s almost a dereliction of duty of the writers of today. Perhaps not just in Star Trek, but in the wider television market.

Yes you’re worried. Yes you’re not happy with the world out there. But now more than ever, turn your pen to something that lifts us up. All of us of all ages and all walks of life.

Bashir, Life Suppor": “Nerys, if I remove the rest of his brain and replace it with a machine, he may look like Bareil, he may even talk like Bareil, but he won't be Bareil. The spark of life will be gone. He'll be dead. And I'll be the one who killed him.”
 
This is written with due respect, understanding that many find inspiration in Trek in places that I do not.
But where is that show that the nine year old can watch and be inspired? To poke around that star and see what’s out there?
Star Trek. That's what I introduce my kids through. Picard and Discovery and things like the ST trilogy of SW all of that is for me. Yes, it is selfish of me but I am going through a dark depressing place at times, and struggle throughout the day. These shows are there to tell me that challenges are overcomeable. That people can gather together and explore.

And you know what? I make my own inspiration! My kids and I buy books on planets and talk about colonizing Mars. My friend and I have been planning a Mars colony since we were in 6th grade.

I don't feel the same way as you, clearly. Largely because I have never fit in-not with Trek fans, not with SW fans, not with anyone. I identify with Spock because he is the outsider, desperate to appease two sides of himself. But, I cannot stop with Spock, just because Spock died, those fingers that plucked the Vulcan lyre, lips stating "Live Long and Prosper" and the wry sense of humor that makes me laugh gone...

...except it isn't.

Picard is the same. He is a person who is highlighting what Star Trek is about-that technology can unite and make humanity better. That our human frailties are nothing in comparison to the power of our imagination. Picard is still that human, because the human spirit lives on, evolves, and grows.

I may not get it, but I will stand up and say Let us be our own inspiration.
 
Yes, Star Trek: TNG was criticised for being anodyne and lacking conflict. But guess what? It was hugely, hugely popular. Undoubtedly the most profitable show for the studio.

TOS through Enterprise was forged by the restrictions of network television (Have to appeal to a mass audience. Have to be family-friendly. Live and die by the Nielsen ratings.)

Streaming did not exist when Enterprise began in 2001. The technology for delivering content has changed. It's a different media environment today.

Enterprise played by the rules that you're infatuated with. It bombed. It only lasted four seasons (as opposed to Trek's Golden Seven Year standard).

Why must Trek live by the strictures imposed by outdated rules?
 
Last edited:
And by you, I mean a copy of your mind
It wasn't a copy, it was a transference. It is his mind, just digitized I assume, but it is HIS mind. It is still him in the way it matters.

And how is this any different than the transporter? That destroys you and rebuilds you.

This also isn't exactly a concept for the franchise, Ira Graves did it in TNG, literally transferred himself into Data's body (while Data was put into his). It was also done even earlier in TOS, though not as well.
 
We naval gaze instead.
You really did not watch the series, did you? I mean that is absolute a poor description of what happened in the series. A group of people literally went to rescue a young woman and to stop a conflict centered on the persecution of a lifeform. Maybe the concept isn't good, but it is not navel gazing.

Unless you really meant naval, and you are referencing something with nautical meaning about which I know nothing.
 
I identify with Seven of Nine for the same reason: she's the misfit, the outsider. The person who never quite fits in.

That was me growing up. Everyone around me seems to know "The Rules" (I didn't ... I still don't).
I apparently don't regarding Trek.
 
I get what OP is saying. Probably for the same reason many Trek fans prefer The Orville to modern Trek. Since they are doing multiple Trek shows and they want each series to be different I am surprised that CBS/Kurtzman haven’t tried to make a series (TNG style) for this segment of the fans. Maybe a Pike series would fit the bill.

as for me, I am happy with the new shows and absolutely loved Picard. But I also like to see a TOS/TNG style series too.
 
What the OP wrote here is extremely well said but I have to say I disagree. What I saw in the last ten hours of Star Trek is what I believe was one of the most Trekkian tales we’ve seen. It was taking all of the ideals of the present and suggesting that despite the negative nature surrounding them, the optimism of Star Trek is still there. It’s still important.

The violence, to me, is no different than “Conspiracy” or The Wrath of Khan. The language is different, yes. But our culture is not quite as puritanical as we were in 1966 or even 1987. F bombs seem to flow more frequently.

As for sharing it with children... My son is eleven months old. I want to share with him all things Star Trek in several years. But I also wouldn’t show a seven or even a ten year old Discovery or Picard. But I do want to share those with him. Eventually. It’ll depend on him. And how he reacts to language and violence. But for now I’m content at starting with “The Cage” and working our way through. (I also know he might not appreciate Trek. And that’s okay too!)
 
What the OP wrote here is extremely well said but I have to say I disagree. What I saw in the last ten hours of Star Trek is what I believe was one of the most Trekkian tales we’ve seen. It was taking all of the ideals of the present and suggesting that despite the negative nature surrounding them, the optimism of Star Trek is still there. It’s still important.

The violence, to me, is no different than “Conspiracy” or The Wrath of Khan. The language is different, yes. But our culture is not quite as puritanical as we were in 1966 or even 1987. F bombs seem to flow more frequently.

As for sharing it with children... My son is eleven months old. I want to share with him all things Star Trek in several years. But I also wouldn’t show a seven or even a ten year old Discovery or Picard. But I do want to share those with him. Eventually. It’ll depend on him. And how he reacts to language and violence. But for now I’m content at starting with “The Cage” and working our way through. (I also know he might not appreciate Trek. And that’s okay too!)
Well said!
 
I get what OP is saying. Probably for the same reason many Trek fans prefer The Orville to modern Trek. Since they are doing multiple Trek shows and they want each series to be different I am surprised that CBS/Kurtzman haven’t tried to make a series (TNG style) for this segment of the fans. Maybe a Pike series would fit the bill.

The Orville bombed on Fox (it's now going to Hulu).
 
I liked Picard more or less, gave it a solid 7. I am sympathetic to the OP's view, though. Expectations, maybe.
 
Picard is great Trek. I love Discovery.

I struggle with large chunks if TNG, Voyager, Enterprise and Voyager. Tastes and styles change.

Orville has reached the point where it's mainly annoying.

Here's hoping for more Discovery and Picard type Trek...
 
One thing I have to point out to the OP, Star Trek was never necessarily meant to be family entertainment. As I've been saying a lot these days, Gene Roddenberry was not Walt Disney. he didn't want to make clean wholesome fun for the whole family he wanted to make an intelligent, adult science fiction show that push boundaries wherever it could to the limits that standards and practices and the format available would allow.

There's been swearing on Star Trek ever since The City on the Edge of Forever. Nobody would raise an eyebrow at, "let's get the hell out of here" today, but in 1967 that was scandalous. Picard swore in French on The Next Generation more than once. There were graphic scenes in Conspiracy and Loud as a Whisper that surpass any graphic violence seen on Picard. In short, the only difference I see in Star Trek between now and then is the year it was produced and what was allowed at the time with the formats available.
 
DS9 is darker than Picard. To say otherwise is revisionist history. Picard didn't spend three years building up to war and then spend two years having one. The tragedy in Picard already happened 14 years before the series started. Picard, unlike DS9, had an upward trajectory to move in.

A speech from Picard stopped a war with an unknown race from happening in the season finale and the Romulans stood down. Picard also showed Soji the error of her ways. And showed Starfleet the error of its ways. And the ban on synths was lifted. All because of Picard. It doesn't get more TNG than that.
 
Last edited:
There are always were moments which inspired me in Star Trek, and moments leaving me absolutely disappointed.

What upsets me is that there is nothing really like that today. It’s as if the writers of Star Trek now – the ones who grew up and benefited from the Star Trek of old – are being selfish.

They want to take that childhood toy, and make it theirs. They don’t want to share. They want to update it and modernise it and make it more edgy because they want an adult Star Trek. They also let their own fears and insecurities manifest through this work.
Agree here. I waited for Picard in hope to see the future of Seven, and can't accept that they did with my favorite role model. Forcing her to kill her adopted son... oh. I can't deal with this "closer to real life = better&fresher". Star Trek with the begin tried to show the life that not real but could to be real. And it had its positive influence on the reality.

Have a strong feeling what if I've watched in my young years STP instead of TOS, the only seeing of Hugh's death and Elnor's desperation could break me down to suicidal thoughts. Happily I've watched TOS... it wasn't absolutely sweet because of, you know, redshirts. But they never tried to kill friendship, trust and hope.

Picard is the same. He is a person who is highlighting what Star Trek is about-that technology can unite and make humanity better. That our human frailties are nothing in comparison to the power of our imagination. Picard is still that human, because the human spirit lives on, evolves, and grows.
Agree here too. The idea that only death brings sense to life... is often misinterpreted. Life itself is everyday fight against death and desperation. The mind and feelings bring sense to life.

Data's choice to die for ever "like human" has no sense because a moment earlier a human choosed to continue live after death. I wonder why Picard even didn't try to change Data's choice. (I sure Kirk would try if he was on Picard's place.)

In "my" Trek they never stopped fighting. In "my" Trek they are searching new paths for saving lives and bring dead back to life instead of revenging for deaths. It means to extend confines of human life, yes. Not for the one or for a few, but for many, even for all. To continue live in synthetic body, or in the body filled with implants... or in the form of nebula (as Kes did).. why not? It's a sci-fi!

And... I sure almost everyone here was saved by technology at least once or even has implants...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top