Sounds like Harry Mudd's punishment in "I, Mudd".
Sounds like Harry Mudd's punishment in "I, Mudd".
However, I am bothered by the clumsy handwaving of Jurati's actions. She says sorry for murder, and everyone's fine with that as long as she hands herself in at some point? She murders her inspiration and lover to prevent hell, but will accept hell because Soji is cool? There's a vague suggestion that she was influenced by the mind meld rather than rationally considering her actions, but it's all very shallowly done.
"Are you going to assimilate me now?" I had a chuckle, but I still don't know what they plan to do with Elnor besides slicing people's heads off.
She is one of the most cardboard villains in all of Trek history. There was a clear difference in how good the stuff in this episode on the ship was and how poor the stuff on the cube was.
It's an option for characters with names and faces who have a story-serving purpose for being given such an alternative.Then again, people got sent to a penal colony for less. (Maquis anyone?)
I'm not sure I'd call a fair trial of independent judges/ jury "tough on crime." Or those penal colonies, if the one we find Tom Paris in is any indication.Different ideas on criminal justice come into and out of vogue all the time. The 23rd and 24th Centuries will be no different. In TOS, the focus seemed to be on rehabilitation. Look at the Tantilus Colony. In TNG/DS9/VOY, the focus seemed to be on punishment. A by-product of when they were produced during the Reagan/HW/Clinton "Tough On Crime" Era.
I'm not sure I'd call a fair trial of independent judges/ jury "tough on crime." Or those penal colonies, if the one we find Tom Paris in is any indication.
Bettering themselves and humanity.By the standards of the 20th/21st Century? No. By the standards of the 24th Century? I'd say yes. I don't get the impression that those penal colonies cared about rehabilitation, unlike in TOS. All they cared about was inmates serving time and doing the equivalent of community service.
Bettering themselves and humanity.![]()
Picard only lectured Mintakans after their culture had been accidentally contaminated. And how many gods did Kirk kill? Why did he not respect the religion of the Vaal worshippers? And anyway, your definition of 'progressive' is bizarre; having a worldview based on scientific principle and empiricism and not letting one's thinking to be clouded by some ancient myths seems pretty progressive to me.There were times TOS seemed more progressive and forward-thinking than TNG did and not just in its penal system. TOS seemed to recognize that faith and religion were still going to be a thing 300 years into its own future and went out of its way to not portray the Federation and Starfleet of the 23rd century as overtly atheistic. Whether or not one holds any such beliefs it's pretty evident that by 1987 Gene Roddenberry had decided that the Federation not only didn't use money(if you say so, Great Bird) but that Starfleet Captains would lecture other societies on culture and what he saw as superstition.
On the one hand, yes and on the other hand we have Landru, Vaal and Apollo whom Kirk did battle against. I suppose one could frame it as battling against false gods, but I would hardly call it entirely respectful of theism either.There were times TOS seemed more progressive and forward-thinking than TNG did and not just in its penal system. TOS seemed to recognize that faith and religion were still going to be a thing 300 years into its own future and went out of its way to not portray the Federation and Starfleet of the 23rd century as overtly atheistic. Whether or not one holds any such beliefs it's pretty evident that by 1987 Gene Roddenberry had decided that the Federation not only didn't use money(if you say so, Great Bird) but that Starfleet Captains would lecture other societies on culture and what he saw as superstition.
Yes exactly! And starting to divide gods into 'false' and 'proper' ones would definitely be imposing one's religious views on others!On the one hand, yes and on the other hand we have Landru, Vaal and Apollo whom Kirk did battle against. I suppose one could frame it as battling against false gods, but I would hardly call it entirely respectful of theism either.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.