• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

Why not? Why does CBS get to dictate how you interpret the material?

Besides, I really doubt CBS gives two shits how I interpret the material.

Because for better or worse, content creators and copyright owners get to have control over these questions. Not fan interpretations...but those are nothing more than fanfic. People make sweeping pronouncements on here about whatever being in an alternate universe and it isn't. Or at least what they should say is "I want DSC to be in its own universe."
 
No. They don't get to tell you how you interpret the material you see. That is straight up 1984 shit there.

The next sentence in my post is literally "not fan interpretations..."

Creators get to decide what is and isn't in their universe and how it's organized.
 
They don't get to tell fans how to interpret the material they see and read. That is pretty much my stance whether it be "Star Trek" or some no-name Netflix crapfest. Once they put it out there, it is up to fans what it means to them.
what it means to fans is one thing. but the facts of the story they're trying to tell, not so much. nobody walked out of the movie 1917 and said, "yeah but it was really more of a world war II movie, so it was set in 1944 and the director has no right to tell me otherwise".
 
They don't get to tell fans how to interpret the material they see and read. That is pretty much my stance whether it be "Star Trek" or some no-name Netflix crapfest. Once they put it out there, it is up to fans what it means to them.

But fans cannot stick their fingers in their ears like a toddler and say "la la la this thing I don't like isn't in the prime universe because I said so".

"Interpretations" are a different thing. Creators can't determine how we interpret the theme of episodes, the symbolism, the drama, character's motivations, etc. But they CAN tell us how the universe/continuity is meant to be organized, even if their decisions are bad. They own the property.
 
But they CAN tell us how the universe/continuity is meant to be organized, even if their decisions are bad.

They can tell us what their intent was. That doesn't mean that intent is going to carry over or make any sense to people watching. I'm not telling anyone to follow me, I've simply point out how I see the universe.

If some fans can't handle the idea that some folks don't see it as one consistent whole, to the point they have to shout down anyone in disagreement. Then their faith in the statements from TPTB aren't all that strong to begin with. They are desperately trying to hang on to something they can't even see.

They own the property.

Good for them?
 
By ship design,does PIC fit into the prime universe(TOS to VOY)?

At this point, there’s no clear design aesthetic for any particular time period because of all the prequels/retcons/etc. that were produced after the fact. If they used a ship that looked like the Sovereign class in DSC, or if they used ships that looked like the Magee and Zimmerman classes in PIC (wink, wink), I wouldn’t be at all surprised. The days of Probert, Sternbach, Okuda, etc. are unfortunately over.
 
It is Prime though. They've said it over and over.

Why do they need to keep saying it over and over? Could it be because not everyone is convinced based on what they are seeing on screen?

I understand the business end of it, "canon" sells now. So anything new is being attached to what came before, rather or not it is remotely like it.
 
I still hope that Discovery will erase itself from the timeline once the series ends. And even if it doesn't, in my headcanon it definitely will.

As for the DiscoPrise in Picard, I consider that a simple continuity error. Just like Geordies uniform at the end of "Yesterday's Enterpise".
 
I still hope that Discovery will erase itself from the timeline once the series ends. And even if it doesn't, in my headcanon it definitely will.

It doesn't need to erase itself, I just consider it part of the vast Trek multiverse.
 
And yet... in regards to the which timeline Disco appears in...

2ebTSBD.gif
 
Why do they need to keep saying it over and over? Could it be because not everyone is convinced based on what they are seeing on screen?

I understand the business end of it, "canon" sells now. So anything new is being attached to what came before, rather or not it is remotely like it.
I'll admit they kinda shot themselves in the foot with the new uniforms, bald Klingons, bridge windows, etc, but I still see it as one big happy continuity, in broad strokes. I think we've had this discussion before though.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top