I've still never owned a copy of that book. It's weird that I missed it when it was new/recent, since I collected every Trek book I could get my hands on back then. If I'd owned it at the time, I would've gotten a lot more of the references in the novels. But I was barely aware it existed. I actually thought its version of the Trek chronology originated in a Best of Trek article, but that article was just using the SFC as one of its sources (and it said as much, but I overlooked that part).
As far as the Alpha Centauri, its fun to have an alternative explanation, but it's surprising how quickly they become fast friends and share their warp inventor and warp drive concept. It reads as surprisingly generous of the Alpha Centauri, and worryingly opportunistic of humans. Their physical and psychological differences are minimal and downplayed to the extent that they might as well be humans anyway.
What sources? I don't think I've ever heard that before. When Number One is treated as a non-Terran, it's usually as an "Illyrian."
Read that one from the library. While I think I prefer the Star Trek Chronology in terms of feeling like an actual "history book" instead of a scrap book of events and stuff, I actually did like it quite a bit, a lot better then that Franz Joseph technical manual everyone swears up and down was the greatest book in the franchise. Some nice artwork and really interesting ideas if you're willing to ignore what came after it.
Aren't the DSC books writing her as a human from the "Illyrian" culture now?
I don't see it as ignoring, just recognizing that they're alternative speculations. The differences in how different creators imagine or interpret the same subject are part of what makes art and creativity interesting.
I believe the Illyrians were always portrayed as engineered humans or something of the sort, which is why I said "non-Terran" instead of "non-human."
Maybe? Una/"Number One" had more then one backstory in the tie-ins, as I recall, some of which I think had her as a member of a non-human species.
My point was, I used "non-Terran" because it encompasses both possibilities.
Read that one from the library. While I think I prefer the Star Trek Chronology in terms of feeling like an actual "history book" instead of a scrap book of events and stuff, I actually did like it quite a bit, a lot better then that Franz Joseph technical manual everyone swears up and down was the greatest book in the franchise. Some nice artwork and really interesting ideas if you're willing to ignore what came after it. Always wondered if the depiction of the Alpha Centauri aliens in the book inspired the player species Centaurans from the LUG Star Trek RPG, given how similar they were.
Remember in the fluff for the aforementioned LUG Star Trek RPG, the backstory on that version of the Centaurans and their dealings with humans was that humans traded their warp drive tech to the Centaurans in exchange for terraforming tech to help Earth recover from the post-atomic horror (the book was written after First Contact was made).
My own reading through the SFC is as a supplement to reading TOS novels from the 80's, such as Strangers From the Sky, without consideration of their canonical state of being. I'm reading it to explore an alternative version of TOS because it is an alternative, not despite that. My reflections and reviews never say anything like "Good book however not canon" "Great but a shame not canon" or "Terrible, so luckily not canon". I treat the word "canon" as a bad word in my review thread, though I don't fuss if other posters discuss it, as long as it's fun. My approach to continuity is simply to examine how individual books differ in continuity details without judgement, and try and gauge if specific continuity changes for an individual book are for the benefit of that book's story. That's my underlying philosophical approach, at least.
Ironically, I'm finding that the bigger concern with the SFC book is not later continuity overwriting it, that's easy. My struggle with it is a little bit of despair the book evokes about how the real world is going, and the real world makes me balk about how the SFC speeds along through major events and technological developments.
I'm not familiar with the LUG variation of the Centauran, because my collection of RPG material is a little patchy. Back in the day I bought the TNG corebook, rather than TOS corebook.
Thank you for sharing the details of how LUG conceptualized the Centaurans differently.
No prob. I was (am?) a huge fans of that alien species. For being one not invented for the TV shows, they did feel pretty organic to the show; the idea of aliens that look exactly like humans is old hat for the franchise and the note that they're the second-most common species serving in Starfleet outside of humans was a simple way to retcon a lot of the "human" extras as possible Centaurans and make the service a bit less human-centric.
STIII disco theme??!?Have you been reading them with the STIII disco theme on in the background?
STIII disco theme??!?
You’ve never heard the disco theme? Even the 2009 Blu-Ray commentary for the film had the commentators mentioning how it was odd in 1984 to find a disco version as a 12-inch 33 single included in the LP. I’ve got the LP (I rarely play it as the vinyl has an air bubble hill in the lead in to the song, so I hear a thud every time the needle hits it) and it’s odd how it’s own record, and it wasn’t squeezed onto the main record.STIII disco theme??!?
it’s odd how it’s own record, and it wasn’t squeezed onto the main record.
You’ve never heard the disco theme? Even the 2009 Blu-Ray commentary for the film had the commentators mentioning how it was odd in 1984 to find a disco version as a 12-inch 33 single included in the LP. I’ve got the LP (I rarely play it as the vinyl has an air bubble hill in the lead in to the song, so I hear a thud every time the needle hits it) and it’s odd how it’s own record, and it wasn’t squeezed onto the main record.
For me, the premise that the alleged native Alpha Centaurians looked exactly like humans was one of the main reasons I disliked the idea. I mean, Alpha Centauri is the closest star to Sol, so it's a huge coincidence if both species are utterly identical.
IIRC the LUG material stated that the Centaurans were earth humans transplanted by the Preservers, just like the people in “The Paradise Syndrome” — just from ancient Greece rather than America.
Damn. I do have it "Side 3."
It's no worse then all the other "look exactly like humans' aliens we've seen in the franchise.
The label doesn't say whether the speed is 33 1/3 rpm or 45 rpm. LP-sized singles were big at the time, but I played it at both speeds and still couldn't tell which I preferred, or was correct. (There is only one speed for the track on the CD.)
I was going to say, it seems much higher than 1 in 10 in TOS.Even granting the fictional conceit that a certain percentage of Trek aliens are exactly identical to humans … say, 1 in 10 sapient species in this part of the galaxy looks exactly human … And the ratio of humanlike aliens seen in Trek by this point is probably considerably lower than 1 in 10, given the makeup advances in the later series
Yours is the most logical premise, of course. I acknowledged that from the get-go.Unless, of course, they were seeded by the Preservers as in some versions of the premise. But then, if they are actually human, why is the seeding conceit even needed at all? Why not just let Alpha Centauri be a human colony settled in Cochrane's time, as it was actually meant to be?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.