Well are you at least happy they didn't retcon the Galaxy class (exterior and maybe, from it seems, the interior) like they did the Connie?What kind of monster are you?!![]()

Well are you at least happy they didn't retcon the Galaxy class (exterior and maybe, from it seems, the interior) like they did the Connie?What kind of monster are you?!![]()
People who say this clearly haven't been to or seen an apple store.
Well are you at least happy they didn't retcon the Galaxy class (exterior and maybe, from it seems, the interior) like they did the Connie?![]()
IndeedIs the modern equivalent of people comparing "2001" to an LSD trip without ever having taken LSD?![]()
Though they did make one tiny mistake on that Galaxy class, they mirrored the smaller shuttle bays, when one should be wider than the other. The Eaglemoss CG model also has that mistake coincidentally. I wonder if CBS used Eaglemoss's model lol.The Galaxy is my second favorite ship behind the original. But it proves the point that old designs hold up well in the current environment.
A food monsterWhat kind of monster are you?!![]()
That's how it starts. The ST: D 1701 was much closer the Pike's 1701 except for the nacelle pylons and Impulse Engines...and I'm sure all the guys at the SFX house will love recreating 30 year old TV and film models and NOT add any flourishes or influences from other sci fi media or Star Trek eras they like...oh, wait...Though they did make one tiny mistake on that Galaxy class, they mirrored the smaller shuttle bays, when one should be wider than the other. The Eaglemoss CG model also has that mistake coincidentally. I wonder if CBS used Eaglemoss's model lol.
I came for the PIC production design debate and opinions. I'm staying for the references to food sex.
We do seem to be talking past each other to some degree. I'm still puzzled as to why that question matters in terms of enjoying a theatrical production. Don't think it's a novel vs TV thing necessarily. One can enjoy a TV show or movie without wanting to live in it, and appreciate good production design without worrying about whether you personally would like to spend time there. See Dracula's castle, Tim Burton's Gotham City, or, nowadays, the candy-colored retro nostalgia of The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel . . .
I usually go for the comfort food after the fuck.I fuck with comfort food all the time.![]()
I wouldn't know...I usually go for the comfort food after the fuck.
![]()
If you need comfort food AFTER...you're doing it wrong...I usually go for the comfort food after the fuck.
![]()
I think it means eating, as in "nom nom nom".
Hip young women are wearing high waisted jeans right now. A style that a few years ago was derided as "Mom jeans", probably by many of those same young women. Fashion![]()
They’ll be back in fashion again in 2401. Along with togas, bell bottoms, and powdered wigs. Hold tight.I'm just waiting for safety pins to come back in fashion again, like they were in 1981. Then after that came the Safety Dance. Then music became bad a couple years after that.
Coming soon, STAR TREK: PLOMEEK SOUP, a raunchy teen comedy about adolescent Vulcans driven nuts by pon farr.
Speaking for myself? Disagree. Military vessels are utilitarian and industrial, not floating beige hotels.But TNG offered something closer to real
This touches on why I think a huge percentage of fan designs are shit. They go for military designs similar to a nuclear submarine and the like. This is in no way realistic for a starship of 1) super advanced construction capabilities and 2) that will be in deep space for 5-20 years. TOS Enterprise wasn’t even as grimdark-accessible a design as those from so many armchair admiral artists.Speaking for myself? Disagree. Military vessels are utilitarian and industrial, not floating beige hotels.
https://www.google.com/search?q=nav...USn-AKHWqPBOAQ_AUoAnoECAwQBA&biw=1920&bih=937
https://www.google.com/search?q=sub...WSiOAKHaHPDIQQ_AUoAnoECA8QBA&biw=1920&bih=937
It felt LESS real to me, which took me a little bit out of the show. And even if we agree that Starfleet is not solely a military, the ships serve that function, and for efficiency in battle would need to be designed for that function FIRST, exploration second. As for the living on the ship for 20 years? The crew quarters and family common areas would probably be a little more homey, but not the funcitonal areas of the ship such as the bridge, engine rooms, or labs.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.