Exactly so. One thing for me, more so than other franchises, is that Star Trek is an imagining of humanity's future. It isn't just its own separate thing, a world imagined outside of Earth. It is very much tied to current humanity, technological development and growth.(The existence of ENT and DSC in no way invalidates TOS for me. No moreso than the existence of any other inconsistency invalidates any other part of the franchise I like.
Thus, a re-imagining is inevitable, because humanity has grown in the past 50 years in technological know-how, understanding of science and capability.
I get it. People love the aesthetic of TOs and would like to see it. But, the aesthetic has always taken a back seat to moving forward with technological abilities. I know it's a worn out argument but I keep going back to it because it demonstrates the principle in action. Both TMP and TWOK demonstrated a moving forward of aesthetic, either uniform or ship, because more money was available to do so.
I might not agree with the design choices. The TMP uniforms are fairly ugly, aside from a couple of exceptions. I certainly would not have gone the way with the Discovery style uniforms. But, their mere existence doesn't automatically make it a problem.
), weak hull reinforcement equal to high-density graviton distortion fields far away from the hull, bulky hatches and small spartan rooms no different from thin and wide doors and large comfortable rooms, a thick and massive warp core just as thin as an actually thin warp core, polarized outer hull plating just the same as internal forcefields, Hoshi's translation work as non-existent, and Erickson's son as not tragically lost the way he was - and then I can find all of that insane.