• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll Is Rey a Mary Sue?

Is Rey a Mary Sue

  • Yes, she absolutely is-make arguments below

    Votes: 24 25.3%
  • No, she is not-make arguments below

    Votes: 34 35.8%
  • Mary Sue is a meaningless term

    Votes: 27 28.4%
  • Don't know, don't care

    Votes: 12 12.6%
  • Doesn't impact me one way or the other

    Votes: 11 11.6%

  • Total voters
    95
I'd like to note that usually when people try to defend a position by pointing out the exact definitions of words, they get dismissed with "language evolves". But apparently "Mary Sue" is somehow set in stone with the most strict interpretation, and anything that falls short doesn't count.
 
Then let us engage in an exercise to benefit the discussion. Define what a "Mary Sue is." Wikipedia has it as this:
A Mary Sue is an idealized and seemingly perfect fictional character. Typically, this character is recognized as an author insert or wish fulfillment.[1] They can usually perform better at tasks than should be possible given the amount of training or experience[2], and usually are able through some means to upstage the protagonist of an established fictional setting, such as by saving the hero.

Dictionary.com has this:
Mary Sue is a term used to describe a fictional character, usually female, who is seen as too perfect and almost boring for lack of flaws, originally written as an idealized version of an author in fanfiction.

To synthesize a Mary Sue is a perfect character, lacking flaws, and overly capable given lack of training.

Would anyone care to add?
 
Let's start with Luke Skywalker - by the time we meet him he wasn't even able to use his considerable white privilege to amount to anything more than a basic farm hand.
How does one define white privilege in a galaxy where there's only one black man?
 
She's as gifted in the Force out of nowhere as Luke and Anakin were, just different. So what she beat Kylo without training? Luke destroyed the Deathstar by letting the Force flow through him, and Anakin won podracing because of it.

Now stop being a little boy, become a man, don't be afraid of women so much and move on.
 
I've gone back and forth over whether I consider Rey a Mary Sue. I think there are some aspects of that there with the character, but for the most part I just feel she is a very underwritten character, a blank slate, that only has a pulse due to Daisy Ridley's acting. There's almost nothing to the character that makes her compelling outside of her representational appeal. And that's not inconsiderable, it can, and for some, is important, but does it make for a character I care about? For me, that's a no.

I do think things were handed to Rey too quickly, perhaps to move along the plot, perhaps to sell her as this uber bad ass, super cool, or kewl, character that we all were supposed to fall in love with, but it didn't work for me. Just crawling around inside starships doesn't give you the skills to pilot them, especially doing the moves we saw her doing with the Millennium Falcon in The Force Awakens. Fighting with a staff isn't the same thing as fighting with a lightsaber, which takes precise skill to prevent cutting off one of your own limbs in a way even a regular sword would not. And there was no explanation for her ability to do a Jedi mind trick on a First Order soldier. I mean, these First Order soldiers supposedly have mental conditioning, so perhaps it should've been harder to influence one of them than a Stormtrooper. Granted, Finn's conditioning had problems, and we know that reconditioning was a thing for First Order soldiers, which implies that their conditioning wasn't perfect; so maybe in this instance Rey got lucky, but still it doesn't explain how she was able to do that.

When it comes to Anakin and Luke we got to see more of them doing some Jedi training-even more than the scant bit Rey received in The Last Jedi (it's good that Rise of Skywalker will seemingly show more training), and we also saw both Luke and Anakin lose body parts and more by the second film in their respective franchises, in a way that Rey has not. The one being strong enough to stop Rey was conveniently taken out by Ren, and we've seen Rey already beat Ren (injured or not, he was decisively beaten and that makes him less threatening; and in Last Jedi Ren know wants her at his side, so while a spurned love interest can be very dangerous, it also makes him less of an overall threat, and more of a lovesick suitor, which doesn't compare to Maul, Dooku, or Sidious, and Tarkin, Vader, or even Jabba who was more menacing; heck Saw Gerrera was more menacing and he was one of the good guys). We haven't seen Rey really lose and have to come back from that, we haven't seen her make a disastrous decision that will later doom her, we haven't seen her make too many mistakes, if any. Rey learning her parents were 'nobodies' in Last Jedi meant little-to me-because we hadn't seen them and they hadn't been in her life so long it wasn't much of a big deal. But with Anakin and Luke we saw some of their homelife before, that gave me a better sense of their loss. Even the big 'twist' about her parents wasn't a personal failing of Rey, that was on her parents, which ennobled the character supposedly even more.

Up to this point, Rey's only involved by choice, whereas Anakin and Luke had more personal/emotional ties, which for me watching raised the stakes, than Rey has. All the new heroes have little skin in the game unlike the original or prequel heroes and so the emotional stakes are lowered. The new heroes feel more like chess pieces that are moved around than characters who are shaped by their universe/time and have a stake in it.

I think Disney just thought the Star Wars brand was all we needed, and real characters were superfluous. If they add diversity to the mix to make the new heroes at least look different that that would cover for not developing good characters, and while the new diversity is something to tout and celebrate, it doesn't take away from weak characters or the lack of emotional connections among them that helped make the original trilogy work so well, and the lack of which hurt the prequels and are really hurting the sequels.
 
Last edited:
In a movie full of terrible scenes that one was the worst.

My point is: One of the messages of Star Wars is that anyone can be a hero. Even a farm boy. Even a slave boy. And yes, even a scavenger girl. Luke, Anakin and Rey? They’re not Gary Stus or Mary Sues. They all are imperfect characters that act as audience surrogates. They are characters for children to look up to. The end.
 
Calling Luke a mary sue for the first film is asinine.. his arc (meant to be a standa alone film ) was perfectly done. I believe mary sue is how we might think of a character.. particularly in a world that was already established.. in aNH we were seeing the world for teh first time.
Shit like this is counterproductive to fixing the issue at the core of this term Mary Sue: the result of lazy writing. And I don’t mean characters like Rey, (who is great and is only called one as a result of butt-hurt) I mean characters who have no flaws outside of the kind that are endearing and are perfect, wish fulfilling characters. The same goes for male counterparts. Lazy writing is always going to exist, but to say it’s not a thing because you disagree with the term is only hurting content overall. It’s absolutely an overused as often incorrectly used term, but that’s about it. Mary Sues usually happen when the background of the character was lazily written so events in her (or his) background will allow her to solve immediate problems without effort or because she is special. If she and her friends come up against a language barrier, she will have it in her background that she knows how to speak. She always has a hair pin to break out of prison, etc.. but the use of Mary Sue extends beyond these conveniences (however justified they may be by her background) to how the audience thinks of the character.. if they feel that too many of these things stack up one after the other and the character always gets out of situations and is above reproach and is always special, then the audience will find themselves not becoming invested into whether the character WILL succeed because they know they will. Rey knows systems on STarkiller base and was able to take out the right fuse (in a shot cleverly echoing her taking a conduit out of the wreck at the beginning of the film. ). She can speak droid. She can speak wookie. She REMINDS characters that she can speak droid when they can't. She REMINDS characters that she can speak wookie when they can't or even when they can (Why did she need to translate Chewie for Luke). She can fly a ship that has not flown in years and pull maneuvers unlike anyone else. She knows the ship BETTER than the previous owner (that the audience knows) and can remove tech device to get it to work. She can perform a mind trick despite never have seen one be performed. She beat an experienced swordsman the first time she ignited a lightsaber (regardless of whether she was injured, the audience by the point in the film kind of doesn't feel any real gander because of all the other things she's been able to do. Further, his being injured should have made him more dangerous, particularly with his ability to channel the Dark side). So in my opinion, whether someone is a Mary Sue is all

about how an audience perceives their abilities stacking up, over the course of the film, and whether this makes the suspense lesser or greater


it's very different. You couple all the mary sue aspects of her character (that she knows how to fly, wield a lightsaber, knows all the alnguages) with the fact that we no nothing about the background of the character.. coupled with the fact that we don't know what DRIVES the character (why is she doing the right thing, except because the writers need her to) and those three elements combined make her a mary sue .. and the fourth element is that the audience is detached from her, never truly worried about her or surprised when she succeeds


That was the journey.. and it was fine for the pulp story that it was.. no one minded until they made Rey later.. and people still don't mind except when they want to defend Rey as a valid comparison.. the hollow comparisons to the old trilogy that actually works as a story and also has withstood 30-40 years of time won't work.

But let's talk about Rey. There is nothing wrong with Rey. her only flaws are that she sees the good in people HAHA. there is no hardship for her, no cross she has to bear.. she is not greedy, prideful, self-centered, emotionally stunted, emotionally unstable, selfish, reckless, overconfident, naive, blinded by love, womanizing, stupid, psychotic, psychopathic, self righteous, narcissistic, inexperienced, overly ambitious,narrow minded, morally ambiguous, or arrogant. She has no vendetta, addiction, superiority complex, bloodlust, jealousy, or lust for power, she has no flaws that she could on personally, yet she is automatically incredible at every activity she does engage in, As a result she is a mary sue, as there is no room to grow (and despite what you keep saying Luke GREW as a character in those old films, both how he looked, how he acted, and how he thought) and there is nothing for her to learn, to change about herself, as she has already made it, she is better than every character at everything, Worse, she imparts lessons on the other characters, including the legacy characters, people that are far more experienced than her, It is very difficult to relate to her as a result. I'm not perfect and have never met perfection. I'm always assured that the writing will take good care of her. This is exemplified by the fact that at the end of the second film she shot down three TIES in one shot! YES and was in a great mood "I like this!" while at the same point in the original trilogy, Luke was barely alive, hanging upside down and calling for help, and his whole world had changed, Even if she earned all those traits (which she didn't) she is still all those things at base, and therefore is not a character..


In addition to what i said above the real difference between Luke and Rey is the same as the difference between active and passive .. Luke, and characters like him, have clear goals (learn the force and save the princess, or fighting crime or avenging their puppy) , characters like Rey don't.. their goals are mired in "the right thing" in the vaguest way, and by definition she doesn't ASK for anything (even Daisy Ridley when talking about Rey, admits she never asked for anything) .. and while characters like Luke might be special because they are powerful, characters like Rey are powerful because they are special. That means that characters like Luke must continually prove themselves.. they gotta keep doing the awesome shit, and sometimes they will fail, sometimes they won't .. but in the process he is constantly creating who is he is.. the mary sue, by contrast, just is.. she is just awesome by virtue of existing .. and who she is often more important than what she does .. and even if a character like Luke has natural ability, we see them working to keep that ability, it is being tested all the time .. where as Rey and the other mary sue is just born amazing, is gifted the powers when she needs them (why was Rey able to perform a mind trick without having seen it performed?) , she is given powers by needs of the plot, or she was given all her powers in her tragic and unseen backstory, nullifying the need for us to question any of it.. or the need to work that hard for any of it on screen. Even the male characters like Harry Potter than lean toward these traits, there is still a sense that they have many conflicts to overcome, goals that are specific that they want to accomplish, a sense of agency in their own story, Rey like characters will often appear weak and vulnerable when.. as far as the story goes, they are invincible. Take Han in Disney Solo movie, within two minutes of the film and after the character is established, he had three clear goals (to leave Corrilia, to get a ship of his own, and to be with the girl) where as Rey.. eh wants to leave, except she wants to stay and wait for her parents, yet she knows they aren';t coming back, and she doesn't really want to help, and she doens't really want to take Solo's job offer, and yet we know she will do the right thing despite the fact there is no reason considering her background for her to do it. Oh and about that Han solo movie, that three year time jump early on.. implies that he had some kind of training ..


yes.. actual training


I'm not saying that Luke is a super deep character.. it is a heros' journey.. a formula that might be as old as the hills, but popular culture really needed a new take on it when it came out. He was peppered with more complexity as the story went on.. peppered.. like sprinkled,, they didn't really radically change the simplistic aspects of his character too much.. unlike TLJ which decided "let's make Luke an asshole and totally different and fool people into thinking he is the same character because thirty years later he COULD be like that, but let's not earn it through real storytelling"..
 
I'm still a little hazy on where Rey got her piloting experience from, however I haven't seen TFA for a while. I remember that she has experience working on the Falcon for Unkar Plutt, so that explains how she knew how to fix it. Though that begs the question why hadn't they actually got it working yet if it was so quick to fix, and why she thought it was garbage. But now we're getting into problems with the script, not with her characterization. At the time, the only thing that really bothered me was the mind trick. Of course if you write a character that just happens to have the right backstory to solve all the problems they encounter in the story, well that sounds like a point and click video game character. Have to reflect more on Luke and Anakin to see if they have the same problem.
 
It's probably more constructive to talk about the male characters and how they're basically all Gary Stus

Let's start with Luke Skywalker - by the time we meet him he wasn't even able to use his considerable white privilege to amount to anything more than a basic farm hand. Probably a virgin too. But before you know it he's blowing up a Death Star

Blowing up his dad's death star is a little similar to Cameron defenestrating his dad's porsche.
 
Of course, in the workprint of Star Wars Luke made two trench runs and used the targeting computer the first time and missed. It was only in his second run that he finally acted on faith and used the Force. (This editing change clarifies lines like "They're coming much faster this time," because, as originally cut, it wasn't the first run.)

Still pretty miraculous, but, The Force™ pretty much makes any character wielding it good at anything.
 
Last edited:
It's a term that's been co-opted to mean "character I don't like" rather than its original meaning.
More specifically "female character I don't like".

To answer the question. No, no, no, no, no, a million times no. Every skill she has is explained - she knew what was wrong with the Falcon, so she knew how to fix it; she beat Kylo Ren by opening herself up to the Force; etc. She is not "more powerful than Yoda" as some people have claimed. She is just a very competent lead character in a Star Wars movie - like Luke, Anakin, Jyn, and Han all are in their respective movies. Just look at Solo - Han has never flown a YT-1300, but he takes the controls instead of Lando, the guy who actually owns the ship, and flies the ship out of a black hole. Does this make him a Gary Stu? No, it makes him a Star Wars character.
 
More specifically "female character I don't like".

To answer the question. No, no, no, no, no, a million times no. Every skill she has is explained - she knew what was wrong with the Falcon, so she knew how to fix it; she beat Kylo Ren by opening herself up to the Force; etc. She is not "more powerful than Yoda" as some people have claimed. She is just a very competent lead character in a Star Wars movie - like Luke, Anakin, Jyn, and Han all are in their respective movies. Just look at Solo - Han has never flown a YT-1300, but he takes the controls instead of Lando, the guy who actually owns the ship, and flies the ship out of a black hole. Does this make him a Gary Stu? No, it makes him a Star Wars character.

Or more generally, a mythic hero archetype implementation :)
 
When people actually bring up valid criticism, it's fine. The problem with the "Mary Sue" argument is that it's not valid, and all it goes down to some people not being able to handle a competent, capable woman as the hero instead of a man.
Rey is not a Mary Sue, because we have seen that she is not perfect, she is not instantly better than all of the other heroes, and everything she does has a reasonable explanation tied to skills we already see her display.
She can fly the Falcon because she has spent her whole life crawling around in ships, and is already familiar with it.
She is good with a lightsaber because we have already seen her fighting with her staff. I even saw people pointing out that her lightsaber technique was the same kind of technique someone would use with a staff.
Rey could the mind trick because Kylo already used it on her, so she just mimicked him.
She didn't defeat Kylo Ren, she managed to hold her own against an already severely wounded Kylo Ren, and the fight ended when the ground split between them and separated them.

You just made my point.

Just because you don't agree with something, does not make the criticism invalid. You are not the arbiter of what is and isn't valid criticism, you are just another bag of flesh who has an opinion.

This attitude of yours, and of the guy I mentioned previously, is the exact reason why the internet is so hostile and polarized in 2019. You have driven everyone who doesn't agree with you to their own corner of the internet, and now the world wide web is simply a web of echo chambers that reinforce your pre-existing beliefs.

I will give you credit over the other guy, as you actually made an argument before you dismissed the opposition, but the opening line of "Well it's okay, as long as you agree with me!" reeks of the same elitism that birthed "The Fandom Menace" and handed the white house to a man most people on this forum considers to be Hitler 2.0.
 
You just made my point.

Just because you don't agree with something, does not make the criticism invalid. You are not the arbiter of what is and isn't valid criticism, you are just another bag of flesh who has an opinion.

This attitude of yours, and of the guy I mentioned previously, is the exact reason why the internet is so hostile and polarized in 2019. You have driven everyone who doesn't agree with you to their own corner of the internet, and now the world wide web is simply a web of echo chambers that reinforce your pre-existing beliefs.

I will give you credit over the other guy, as you actually made an argument before you dismissed the opposition, but the opening line of "Well it's okay, as long as you agree with me!" reeks of the same elitism that birthed "The Fandom Menace" and handed the white house to a man most people on this forum considers to be Hitler 2.0.

Do you have something to add to the topic of whether or not Rey is a Mary Sue?
 
When people actually bring up valid criticism, it's fine. The problem with the "Mary Sue" argument is that it's not valid, and all it goes down to some people not being able to handle a competent, capable woman as the hero instead of a man.
Rey is not a Mary Sue, because we have seen that she is not perfect, she is not instantly better than all of the other heroes, and everything she does has a reasonable explanation tied to skills we already see her display.
She can fly the Falcon because she has spent her whole life crawling around in ships, and is already familiar with it.
She is good with a lightsaber because we have already seen her fighting with her staff. I even saw people pointing out that her lightsaber technique was the same kind of technique someone would use with a staff.
Rey could the mind trick because Kylo already used it on her, so she just mimicked him.
She didn't defeat Kylo Ren, she managed to hold her own against an already severely wounded Kylo Ren, and the fight ended when the ground split between them and separated them.
i've demonstrated why it's valid that she is a mary sue
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top