I want to sincerely thank you, Donny, for not making the nacelles glow, either with the blue inner grilles or the rear “ball” that people seem to enjoy doing with their models for some perverse reason.
I won’t even depict the impulse engines with a glow! I’ve always maintained with these ships to not add embellishments like that which would fall outside of what we saw on the 11 foot filming model of the Enterprise.I want to sincerely thank you, Donny, for not making the nacelles glow, either with the blue inner grilles or the rear “ball” that people seem to enjoy doing with their models for some perverse reason.
In fairness, we did not see those embellishments, and I would not include them either, but they were ordered from Richard Datin. They presumably fell outside the permissible time and/or money budget. So, it is quite arguable they reflect the original artist’s intent.I won’t even depict the impulse engines with a glow! I’ve always maintained with these ships to not add embellishments like that which would fall outside of what we saw on the 11 foot filming model of the Enterprise.
I stated up-thread a bit that I want to eventually do bridge variants of all the different ships I’m modeling, even if it’s something as simple as changing the color scheme slightly. I’m definitely on an exterior model kick right now, but when I return to interiors I’ll give it a shot.Donny those are very nice would the bridge be the same TOS lay out or some Varient ? Both this one and the fan movie are my favorites. Looking forward to your next project.
Perhaps I’ll make a proper cover sheet and keep the perspective view for that, and on this spec sheet just feature all the orthographic views without call-outs. Thanks for the feedback!Probably the most minor quibble: the 3/4 view looks to have perspective, which just jumps out as wrong for the "technical" format. Isometric all the way for diagrammatic purposes, realistic perspective for cover art or something like that. (I know, one could argue that the first page IS like a cover, but I'd disagree for this format.)
You give a mouse a cookie, and he asks for some milkA Longitudinal Section would be nice too.![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm looking forward to this. I love the design and I'm glad you're approaching this. I still would like you to approach Jeffries' shuttlecraft concepts where some members feel it had a Romulan look, but I disagree. I can hardly wait to see your Antares' designs.So last night I was debating venturing into Romulan territory and start modeling the Bird-of-Prey, but decided to go ahead with the Antares since I've been itching to do it since I started this ship exterior model venture.
I know some may have mixed feeling about this little ship, but I have a soft spot for it. For the TAS fans out there, I'm also going to do a proper model without the habitat module so that I'll have the unmanned cargo drone for my fleet as well.
There are three primary sources I'm drawing on for this model, which are TAS, TOS-R, and the Eaglemoss model (it's got a few features I like, for instance the cargo hatch on the aft side of the lowest-hanging section in the middle). I like the TOS-R mastered model fine, but I'm correcting a few of it's details to bring it more in line with some of the TAS details. I'll also be giving her a proper paint of Starfleet Grey/Green(TM) instead of that slight metallic look it had in TOS-R.
Here's my detail compilation I'm using as reference/inspiration (those images in the lower right corner are from the new TAS book)
And the primary schematics I'm using, although I'm widening the middle and tail section just a smidge and changing some details here and there. I believe this is the schematic that Okuda whipped up for the modeling team on TOS-R, but I could be mistaken.
![]()
My boss got his in on Friday before I left for the weekend! I quickly thumbed through it and snapped a couple pics.Great to see TAS getting a little love.
I'm still waiting for my copy of the new book to arrive!![]()
The schematic you sent confirms that the ship in TAS is much wider than it is in TOS-R! I'll have to do some adjustments.I just emailed you an actual Filmation set of elevations for the robot grain ships. The curvature of the lowermost part of the ship is really apparent on it.
I thought the same thing until I started doing research for this build. The TAS concept art confirms that they were flat semi-circles, but they are lit in TAS so that's interesting.Also, I always thought that two half spheres on the aft end of the hull were supposed to be light emitting domes, like the one Enterprise has under the saucer. Only now seeing your model (and the accompanying references) do I see they're flat semi-circles.
I'll be honest, I like the new location of the deflector dish. But I just overall like the Antares design seen in TOS-R so maybe I'm just biased.For me that TOS-R Antares would have been better had the habitation module been attached higher, like the Enterprise's saucer, thus allowing the dish on the front to not need to be moved down.
I buy that, although it's a robot freighter, not a ship that's gonna grace the covers of Starships Monthly magazine, and the TOS-R version carries the windows forward through the command module. I like the idea of a vessel that isn't designed to be crewed being a modular component of a larger ship that can be configured to also have a crew for a fuller range of duties.Slapping a vaguely hexagonal command module onto a ship that otherwise does not exhibit anything vaguely that shape was bad design.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.