One sets a bad precedent and involves lawyers.So, assuming the mural was benign, if Disney brass were so paranoid about their property being infringed upon, they could take about five minutes and draw up a contract in which the school would pay $1 for a 99-year lease on Mickey's image for the mural.
Or, they could be predatory jerks and sue. Six of one, half dozen of another...
Nope. It started off trying to get me to like an unrepentant former Confederate officer (i.e., almost certain genocidal racist), and never improved - indeed, it had the gall to intercut a scene of him slaughtering scores of aliens with him burying his own oh-so-cruelly killed family, so we could solemnly mourn the pain only he can ever know or feel. You know, the guy that fought for permanent slavery in the South.
Luke is the most interesting character for me in film, from ANH all the way to TLJ.
How much do you get paid to write this pro corporate drivel?
Ah, I see. If I want to protect my property rights its fine, but standing up for other's property rights its "drivel."
There are lots of suspected Disney shills on this board. Welcome to the list.
Of course I wouldn't tell a school to remove a character I drew. It would be a huge honor, and great advertising for my character.Ok...and?
If it was your personal property would you defend it?
When would you defend it? When the 100th school did it? When they were selling it without your permission? Perhaps when it gets featured in a picture regarding politics you don't agree with? What's the line for defending personal property?
As always, wrong.Nope. It started off trying to get me to like an unrepentant former Confederate officer (i.e., almost certain genocidal racist), and never improved - indeed, it had the gall to intercut a scene of him slaughtering scores of aliens with him burying his own oh-so-cruelly killed family, so we could solemnly mourn the pain only he can ever know or feel. You know, the guy that fought for permanent slavery in the South.
Hint: change "Confederate" to "Nazi" in the above paragraph, and see how it reads.
Fun movie.
I prefer unreasonable explanations anyway.Nah, not really. That would be a more reasonable explanation than anything else for the behavior of some posters on here though
When would you defend it? When the 100th school did it? When they were selling it without your permission? Perhaps when it gets featured in a picture regarding politics you don't agree with? What's the line for defending personal property?
Each step invites more infringement upon personal property rights. But, by all means, please pitch your idea to the school. Perhaps they will replace it with yours
Doesn't change the simple fact that people have the right to defend their property.
I'm not positive, but I think I did see talk of one not that long.
All of which has absolutely nothing to do with the story being told.Nope. It started off trying to get me to like an unrepentant former Confederate officer (i.e., almost certain genocidal racist), and never improved - indeed, it had the gall to intercut a scene of him slaughtering scores of aliens with him burying his own oh-so-cruelly killed family, so we could solemnly mourn the pain only he can ever know or feel. You know, the guy that fought for permanent slavery in the South.
Hint: change "Confederate" to "Nazi" in the above paragraph, and see how it reads.
Yeah, that's what Disney is doing. Lobbying to change copyright laws to suit their own needs. And the reason they can do that is that they are a multi billion dollar corporation that has influence in government. If that's perfectly normal to you, then ok. This conversation is over.
