As of this previous thread, the 1982 Siskel & Ebert TWOK review had yet to be posted. Here it is:
Thanks for posting this. I remember watching the show after the third time I went to the theatre to see TWOK. While I was happy for the positive reviews, I think the criticism went over my head. I thought Siskel was a bit harsh, even condescending.As of this previous thread, the 1982 Siskel & Ebert TWOK review had yet to be posted. Here it is:
I doubt a studio would allow such lengthy portions of their film to be shown so soon after releaseOne stray thought: my goodness those clips ran long! These days I doubt a critic would cede so much time to subject matter.
As of this previous thread, the 1982 Siskel & Ebert TWOK review had yet to be posted. Here it is:
Wow that was so awesome. I was just a kid in the 80's, but that's when movies were an EVENT.
Thanks for the trip down memory lane!
Star Wars' plot is the least important thing, it was the unique mashup of genres and its groundbreaking visuals that made it a big hit. It's still a fun movie (I just saw a vintage 70mm print at the Motion Picture Academy).
- whiz bang star wars effects don't last as long as robust buildups the way II and VI had unless nothing of the sort had been seen before (which is why A New Hope got anywhere, the plot is so sub b-movie)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.