• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

New version of The Twilight Zone to be on CBS All Access

I must say - if that's your feeling, had you watched Rod Serling's original TZ when it was first run, you wouldn't have liked it either. There are more overtly political messages in it that now 50 years later are unrecognized by modern audiences.

Exactly. 'The Monsters are Due on Maple Street' for instance was a critique of McCarthyism and Red Scare hysteria prevalent at the time. A lot of episodes dealt with Cold War themes and had an anti nuclear weapons message.
 
I'd like to watch The Twilight Zone, not The Liberal Zone.
On the other hand, I'd love to watch The Liberal Zone, rather than the Millennial Zone. This revival has hardly been a tribute to that legendary liberal Rod Serling and his creation, the legendary liberal television show The Twilight Zone.
 
I've been thoroughly enjoying the new TZ.

The productions are lush. They've taken great time a care with the cinematography, costuming, scoring, and production design. The performances have been delightful across the board. I think they've done a great job utilizing classic s.f. sensibilities and scenarios to tell stories that are relevant to the current public discourse.

I've had quibbles here and there, and the odd episode that didn't work for me, but I find myself anticipating the show each week.
 
Last edited:
Episode 8, "Point of Origin."

This one had a couple of familiar faces: Snow White from Once Upon A Time and Sarek from Discovery.

It certainly did an excellent job of capturing the feeling of classic Twilight Zone, recalling episodes such as Eye of the Beholder and The Obsolete Man and Third From The Sun and others, with an individual or small group under threat from an oppressive police state. The tension and paranoia were palpable. In this case, it was all in the service of a metaphor for immigration-- specifically the issue of immigrants who came here illegally at an age when it can't be considered their fault-- and a little amnesia was thrown in to add a little mystery.

It was actually pretty well done this time, although it's not exactly the most difficult aspect of the immigration problem to tackle. The agents of, presumably, the government were as stone faced and unforthcoming as one would expect in a TZ police state, as well as closed off to any extenuating circumstances. The mother was surprisingly presented in a sympathetic manner, willing to help her housekeeper's grandchildren without hesitation and trying to save her from the immigration officials-- although there was a strangely hostile confrontation in the detention center that was kind of forced. Aside from that, the script was well written with only a handful of cringe moments (the use of the word "caravan," the detention center orderly's "I don't look like you," and the closing narration are the only ones I can think of). The family's abandonment of the mother didn't really serve the metaphor, but it certainly served The Twilight Zone.

All in all, one of the two best of the series, along with the Mars Expedition episode. It conjured up the Twilight Zone very well, dealt with a prominent social issue in an engaging manner, even if they played softball with it, and made it personal with sympathetic characters and good actors. If this was the worst episode of the series instead of a standout, we'd have a really good show on our hands.
 
Yeah, I actually liked this episode. It was definitely super heavy-handed, but that was kind of needed for this issue, to try to get some viewers to wake up and see that the ridiculous actions taking place in the show are literally happening in precisely the same manner in the real world.

Usually I don't like this ultra heavy handed stuff, but it seemed to work just fine here.

Beyond that, a good TZ story of mystery and suspense.

The highlight was just sitting there watching the episode start off, and all of a sudden there's Michael Eklund playing a guitar!
 
Once again, I loved everything about this episode except for the script. I keep coming back hoping I'm going to get a great episode. I'm pretty liberal, but I feel like I'm getting slapped in the face with morals every week. I will watch the finale, but I'm honestly not going to watch next season unless I've heard things have drastically improved.
 
Has “The Blue Scorpion” aired yet? How was it?

I would rate it as good. One of the better ones so far.

MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD

Reading this will definitely negatively impact your enjoyment of the episode if you intend to do so in the future. It will straight up ruin it.


Okay, consider yourself warned. I've seen a number of complaints from people in this very thread (quite a few, it seems like) who were a little disappointed that The Twilight Zone frequently seemed to punish good people. (Or some variations on that complaint.) At least this iteration of the show. Well we certainly didn't get that tonight. We got a guy who was going through a very rough time of life, and the whole episode was set up to make it look like he was going to have a very predictable unhappy ending. But then in the end, he basically won the lottery. Surprise, a happy ending. Just for that twist alone, I'd rate this a good episode. But overall, it did a nice job setting things up too. Midway though the episode, it was very easy to find this guy pretty sympathetic. And at the point where his wife wanted to take his dead dad's guitar, we were all surely cheering for her to meet her demise instead of him. That was cold! The happy ending was a huge surprise, especially for this particular series. But it was even a good episode otherwise too. It was a creative backstory for the guy and especially his dad. They made the background part really interesting. (And even played a nice tune or two too.)


Also, our old friend 1015 was pretty prominent this time. The serial number was so blatant, but the 59 was tacked on pretty noticeably as well at the end, so I looked it up to see if an old episode of Twilight Zone aired on October 15, 1959. I figured that might have been a clue. But no such luck, missed it by one day. It's probably just Jordan Peele's daughter's birthday or something like that.
 
H
Exactly. 'The Monsters are Due on Maple Street' for instance was a critique of McCarthyism and Red Scare hysteria prevalent at the time. A lot of episodes dealt with Cold War themes and had an anti nuclear weapons message.

The difference is that the original show's messaging was clever and subtle. This show is anything but that. It's unfortunate, but also very true.
 
Not any story, but when they all do the same thing, and all take extreme positions, demonize anyone who isn't hard core extreme, and mischaracterize the other side, yes, that's not good, and yes, you're right that the show isn't for me. If that's what they want to do, it's their show, but let's call a duck a duck and own it.
Extreme positions like racism is bad, sexism is bad, nuking the whole planet is bad, and locking people from other places in cages is bad. Yeah, that's just real hardcore extreme beliefs, if you're to the right of Goebbels.

The original hated racism, bigotry, nuking the planet, and other liberal things too. Serling is pretty open about hating bigots, that's why they got punished in the Twilight Zone.

I happen to think that the singular evil of our time is prejudice. It is from this evil that all other evils grow and multiply. In almost everything I've written there is a thread of this: man's seemingly palpable need to dislike someone other than himself.
 
Last edited:
H

The difference is that the original show's messaging was clever and subtle. This show is anything but that. It's unfortunate, but also very true.
It really wasn't. Most of the episodes are pretty obvious if you're thinking about what's on screen and being told to you.
 
"The Wunderkind" might very well be the absolute worst Twilight Zone episode ever in the entire history of TV. I feel like I have been psychologically tortured. There is so much that is wrong about the episode that I am struggling to even organize my thoughts.

1) It is a such a blunt metaphor for Trump that it loses all value. The episode literally hits the viewer in the head over and over again with the criticisms of Trump (immature, incompetent, uninformed, etc) but there is zero subtlety and zero intelligence in how the episode does it. Metaphors have to have some intelligence to them in order to work. This episode did not do that.

2) The child was super annoying, it was grating. I just wanted to smack the kid. Why anyone would ever listen to this kid in the first place is beyond ridiculous.

3) The very concept of a kid running for president completely strains credibility. For one, it completely violates the constitution because he fails the age requirement. The episode tries to get around this by saying that the mother's name was on the ballot. What!? No, that does not work! If her name were on the ballot, she would President, not the kid. Plus, it would be obvious election fraud if her name were on the ballot but the kid was going around being the candidate. The Federal Election Committee or whatever would never allow it. The other candidates would never allow it. And where was the vice-president in all this? No mention of the vice-president. And the episode completely skips from the Iowa caucus straight to Inauguration day. So the kid somehow got through all the primaries, and the party still nominated him and he won the general election? Seriously!?! Oh and what party was he running on? Was he running as an independent and he somehow beat both major parties? Or did one of the major parties (Democrats or Republicans) actually nominate a 11 year old kid to be their national candidate? And we are really supposed to believe that one video about his dying dog would save his campaign after literally having him cry for his mommy on national TV. It is utterly preposterous and had so many plot holes, it makes your head spin.

4) Are we really supposed to believe that grown men like the Chief of Staff and the General would take orders from a 11 year old kid? And what about Congress? Impeachment? 25th amendment? Are we really supposed to believe that the entire government and as we see in the episode, the entire nation is so enamored with the kid that they are ok with it? I get the Trump metaphor (Trump acts immature or incompetent or obstructs justice and nobody does anything to remove him from office) but it just strains all credibility.

Basically, when your metaphor is implausible and ridiculous, it fails because the audience can't get pass how ridiculous it is. There has to be some realism for the metaphor to work. The very premise of a 11 year old running for President is so ludicrous that it causes everything else to collapse.

5) The episode was not even well written and it was too long.There were no interesting scenes or thought provoking scenes. Nothing. It was just an episode with a bratty kid running around that dragged on way too long.

6) It was too predictable. They literally show us Ralph in some type of creepy surgery scene right off the bat and tell us it is a flash forward which gave away the ending. And we knew as soon as he decided to represent the kid that the kid was going to be elected somehow. It was utterly predictable.

There are probably other flaws but those are the main ones that I could think of off the top of my head.

Black Mirror actually did this very same topic much better, in the ep "the Waldo moment" where an offensive cartoon character runs for president and wins. That episode was much better because while a cartoon character running for president is absurd, it is a bit more believable than a kid who wants to play video games. And that episode actually had some good scenes in it. And the episode did explore some nice themes of how the population responds to an outsider candidate.

The Outer Limits also did a good "President" episode with Babylon 5's Bruce Boxleitner called "Decompression". That episode dealt with a mysterious time traveler from the future who convinces a presidential candidate that he needs to jump from a plane that is going to crash to save himself. The traveler promises to save him when he jumps and tells him that he must do it to live because only he can save America from a horrible dystopian future. The candidate, being a total narcissist, jumps and naturally falls to his death and we learn that the traveler from the future essentially tricked him into committing suicide because he was not going to save the country, he was actually going to be the dictator that destroys America. Now that was a great episode! It had tension. It had great acting. It had an ironic twist. This episode had nothing like that.

Although this particular episode sounds to be a stinker much like this comic book (itself a ripoff of this movie which handled the concept better), and this television show, the thing that gets me is how people can stand and accept how Obama was treated during his presidency (with pictures like this) but as soon as Trump gets dealt with, it's 'not good enough' or 'it's too much like a sledgehammer' or some other bullshit. It seems to me that people like you support Trump more than you realize (and if you don't, please correct me, but it had better be a well-explained/good correction.) ;)
 
Last edited:
Although this particular episode sounds to be a stinker much like this comic book (itself a ripoff of this movie which handled the concept better), and this television show, the thing that gets me is how people can stand and accept how Obama was treated during his presidency (with pictures like this) but as soon as Trump gets dealt with, it's 'not good enough' or 'it's too much like a sledgehammer' or some other bullshit. It seems to me that people like you support Trump more than you realize (and if you don't, please correct me, but it had better be a well-explained/good correction.)

You misunderstand my criticism. I am not criticizing the ep because I support Trump. I loathe Trump. He is a con man, childish, immature, uninformed, unintelligent, dishonest, narcissistic, egotistical, and a crook. I voted 3rd party (Evan McMullin) to avoid voting for Trump. My criticism of the episode is based on what I see as very poor writing. As I outlined in my post that you quote, I explain how the premise is impossible and how the episode was full of plot holes. So the writing was very poor IMO. I have no issue with a show making fun of Trump if the writing is good.

And I HATE how Obama was treated. the Joker pic you reference is disgusting and just one example of how many on the Right were vile in their attacks against Pres. Obama. And I hate Fox News and Conservative Talk Radio for the role they played in the vile attacks against Obama.
 
Last edited:
Educate yourself.
https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/
https://www.vox.com/identities/2016...-shootings-killings-racism-racial-disparities

And before you suggest I'm saying this because I have a grudge against police, several members of my family are in law enforcement, as my family have been since they first immigrated here. I don't think all or even the majority of cops are bad, but there is a major systemic problem with police misconduct and excessive force/shootings, especially towards minorities, and you dismissing it because it doesn't personally affect you is pretty messed up.

Wait, Locutus, it gets worse: the cops are shooting (and in some cases killing) disabled people (those with an intellectual disability and those who are on the spectrum); plus, they're killing mentally ill people as usual:

Down Syndrome Man Goes to Movies, Ends up in Morgue Over $12 Ticket

Worse Than Eric Garner: Cops Who Got Away With Killing Autistic Men and Little Girls

Cops have also been insulting people with Down's Syndrome as well:

2 Toronto policemen who mocked woman with Down syndrome plead guilty to misconduct

The death of Sammy Yatim (mentally ill man shot to death on a Toronto streetcar)

And oh yeah, about autism;

Mother still seeking justice for autistic son arrested by police for being 'drunk'

You misunderstand my criticism. I am not criticizing the ep because I support Trump. I loathe Trump. He is a con man, childish, immature, uninformed, unintelligent, dishonest, narcissistic, egotistical, and a crook. I voted 3rd party (Evan McMullin) to avoid voting for Trump. My criticism of the episode is based on what I see as very poor writing. As I outlined in my post that you quote, I explain how the premise is impossible and how the episode was full of plot holes. So the writing was very poor IMO. I have no issue with a show making fun of Trump if the writing is good.

And I HATE how Obama was treated. the Joker pic you reference is disgusting and just one example of how many on the Right were vile in their attacks against Pres. Obama. And I hate Fox News and Conservative Talk Radio for the role they played in the vile attacks against Obama.

I apologize, Romulan Spy.
 
Last edited:
I think that Trump has been treated worse than Obama.

Although Trump has earned or deserved every slight and is still getting away with murder.
 
^^ The original series was subtle and adult-- this revival is awkward and naive.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Ofwn6V6.gif
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top