• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

THE ORVILLE Season Three...

I really don't think that's necessary. For the foreseeable future, most Orville discussion is likely to be limited to this thread, and even then, this thread is going quiet down after this buzz over the renewal has died down. The thread will likely become active again once the season starts filming and we start getting guest star announcements and photos from filming. Even then, it's just going to be this one thread up until the season premieres and we start getting episode discussion threads again. But that won't be for another year at least.

Besides, even in the midst of season 2 when Orville discussion was at its height, there were still less active Orville threads here than there were active superhero threads. As long as there's no need for a superhero subforum, there's no need for an Orville subforum either.

Except of a few minor things, at least regarding superheroes -

The MCU movie series has been all the rage, increasingly, with its culmination taking place at the same time. It's not hard to see why MCU would be swamping out everything else.

A superhero forum could be justified, IMHO - not because of the aforementioned MCU but because it is its own subgenre that's large enough. It's not really sci-fi. It's not really fantasy. It's somewhere in the middle while being something completely different. And, most importantly, it is that large a category with all the superheros therein.

Entirely agreed with you regarding Orville not needing its own special room.

If it offends you, don't watch the show. That way you won't be supporting such "evil" practices.

Hmmm, cliquish shoulder-patting rooms accomplish little more than "self-indulgent" sessions and not in a good chocolate candy bar with peanuts and nougat sort of way. The occasional "I don't like it because" is most appropriate, given there's anything approaching a reason. "I HATE IT!!!!" is not any more or less irksome than "I LOVE IT!!!!", as they are not reasons but emotional reactions - which are nothing in of themselves. As if that accomplishes anything but usually people don't incessantly obsess over shows they don't like compared to those that do. Is it possible they're hating something they want to like?
 
This is from a TV Guide piece, and makes all kinds of sense:

The sci-fi series was one of the last veteran shows Fox made a decision on before it announces its 2019-2020 fall schedule next week, likely because the decision wasn't an easy one for Fox. The Orville requires a bit more heavy lifting than other shows on broadcast television due to special effects, costuming, and character design. Despite being shorter than typical broadcast shows, Season 2 was delayed to late December to allow the production team to finish up special effects.

The renewal is a sign of faith from Fox. After being Fox's fifth-highest rated series in 2017, the show fell to Fox's twelfth-highest rated show in 2018-2019, dropping a full half point in ratings. Though The Orville survived, other genre programming on Fox didn't. The network canceled The Passage and The Gifted, and Gotham aired its final season.

Unless there's an unlikely turn-around in ratings next season, the future of the show will always be touch-and-go at best. I'll just be glad to have one more year of it - in terms of quality and the level of storytelling, the show's produced more early successes than any version of Trek other than TOS. So thirteen episodes of The Orville is as good as an old-fashioned twenty-six episode season of the stuff I used to like best.
 
It's the same old stodgy Trek, with more money and a little less sense.

And DSC co-opting already established Trek ideas, making changes, and trying to say they made it first even though said changes make a mockery of Trek. Unless an episode explains cogently how what seems like a mockery can fit into the canon the makers claim it is in. which they may have done but whatever the resolution for Spock becoming a mass murderer of his shrinks was, and still managed to become second in command of the Federation flagship... seems a bit bizarre. But just zap a time crystal and they can rewrite time that it never happened, thus rendering hollow and utter blankenship the characterizations and scripting are. If people didn't like it when VOY did the reset button, why would they like it now if it's the same plot trope used as the same copout? (which DSC may or may not have done, I doubt they addressed anything anyway, especially if you're not the only one saying "little less sense". At least you gave it more of a longer chance, but that premiere alone was so chock full of-- and that's before the laughably bad mutiny, much less everything coming afterward - sigh... then came the season 2 premiere. And yet it's season one TNG that's said to be bad?

It was looking dire there!

But good!


Some "Firefly" fans must be looking real pissed about right now.
Not me though, but I am one. I'm more still sour, but this helped.

FOX did drop the ball too soon with "Firefly" but how direct a comparison can be made given all the variables between then and now?
 
If the "comic book related movies™" haven't gotten their own sub-forum, I don't see the Orville needing one.

If @Serveaux could get the weekly episode threads pinned for the week, that would be helpful.
 
This is from a TV Guide piece, and makes all kinds of sense:



Unless there's an unlikely turn-around in ratings next season, the future of the show will always be touch-and-go at best. I'll just be glad to have one more year of it - in terms of quality and the level of storytelling, the show's produced more early successes than any version of Trek other than TOS. So thirteen episodes of The Orville is as good as an old-fashioned twenty-six episode season of the stuff I used to like best.

My gut feeling is that it will be retooled. I'm more worried as to how. "Sliders season 3" is an obvious example of how not to retool a show. A sure way to end the show is to have it carbon copy the big screen movie of the week formula.

And, seconded, Orville season one bests all Trek season one incarnations (except TOS). Or maybe TOS in certain aspects. But TOS pretty much made a new genre, even if it's loosely based on "Wagon train" westerns melded with 50s sci-fi such as "Forbidden Planet", back then Leslie Nielsen wasn't telling people not to call him Shirley or WD40.
 
This is outstanding news. Now they need to promote the show some. My wishlist:
*Done with the Moclans. The last episode about them, with the women, served its purpose well. Only needs occasional revistis
*One Kaylon episode, max. I loved what they did with them, but too much of a good thing ruins it.
*More of Yaphit and Yaphitkind.
*Kelly came into her own in this season, as did Bortus and Malloy and Claire. We need more Lamarr and a little more Kelaya.
*Advance the Krill plot a little
*Cameos from: Levar Burton, Jeffrey Combs, Andy Robinson, Armin Shimerman, Jonathan Frakes, Jeri Ryan, Gates McFadden, Nana Visitor in order of preference
 
I don't need to see any Trek cameos on the show, but I don't doubt that they'll do them with regularity.

Yeah, it's time to revisit the Krill. I want to see Ed and Telaya dealing with one another at least once more.
 
I too am a California Taxpayer, and while I have many issues with this state, having an industry that seems to be losing jobs left and right to places like Toronto, Vancouver and Georgia be able to keep filming in California and provide more jobs for people in said industry, I think that's a good thing.


Yeah, and as a Canadian coming into this thread, I'm actually taken aback over the criticism that California is doing its best to keep jobs in the state. I'd have thought it was a good thing as I know how difficult it is to keep an industry happy when there are good deals all around. An industry's gotta do what it's gotta do to keep itself healthy.

Anyway, I'm really happy about the announcement. The show's been a pleasure to watch. I'll be eagerly waiting for season 3.
 
Although I gave up on the show, I'm happy for the fans! :)

Wow! Someone not a fan of a show NOT wishing it to be cancelled because other people like it. That's amazing!
You had to see the problems I had years ago when someone incessantly demanded for the cancellation of ENTERPRISE, and I responded that they should just not watch and let people who enjoy the show go on enjoying the show. What a ruckus. I was brigged for a while, even my avatar was suspect.
You have a great attitude. If someone doesn't like a show, don't watch it. Don't try to get it cancelled because there are people who do like it.
 
I would prefer a separate forum because for various reasons I miss the Orville threads normally unless I'm not logged in first.
That seems excessive, it's one show that hasn't even aired three seasons yet.

And DSC co-opting already established Trek ideas, making changes, and trying to say they made it first even though said changes make a mockery of Trek. Unless an episode explains cogently how what seems like a mockery can fit into the canon the makers claim it is in. which they may have done but whatever the resolution for Spock becoming a mass murderer of his shrinks was, and still managed to become second in command of the Federation flagship... seems a bit bizarre. But just zap a time crystal and they can rewrite time that it never happened, thus rendering hollow and utter blankenship the characterizations and scripting are. If people didn't like it when VOY did the reset button, why would they like it now if it's the same plot trope used as the same copout? (which DSC may or may not have done, I doubt they addressed anything anyway, especially if you're not the only one saying "little less sense". At least you gave it more of a longer chance, but that premiere alone was so chock full of-- and that's before the laughably bad mutiny, much less everything coming afterward - sigh... then came the season 2 premiere. And yet it's season one TNG that's said to be bad?
How much of the second season did you watch? Because that is not what happened.
If the "comic book related movies™" haven't gotten their own sub-forum, I don't see the Orville needing one.

If @Serveaux could get the weekly episode threads pinned for the week, that would be helpful.
Do we really even need a seperate thread when we already have this one for the whole season. I love the show, but having different threads for every episode was driving crazy this last season. I couldn't even begin to keep up, or keep track of what conversations were going on in what thread.
 
I confess I thought the early part of season two was really weak. They had NFL lead ins and strong starter ratings but fell pretty m hard. Too many Moclan episodes and dumb plots. Should have started the show off with something from the second half. I’m just glad it survived.
 
I'm committed, for now, to doing a separate topic for each episode, as well as the season topics. Maybe the occasional narrow-focus topic.

Someone started a tech topic for the show, but it didn't go anywhere - the gadgets on The Orville are, for the most part, generic and familiar - most of them were widely used in old movie serials before Roddenberry was old enough to vote, and giving them new names and minor innovations probably isn't enough to pique too much ongoing interest.

I'm also not a fan of "How awesome/awful was this episode" polls, with or without "How awesome are the witty little storyline-specific changes I can ring on the ranking labels"* so I won't be adding them.

*Or maybe I'm too lazy to work on puns, I dunno.
 
Last edited:
It's one Trek trope they have yet to mine, so I wouldn't be surprised if we saw it in the third season.

Not that I mind the mining of Trek tropes at all...I like the Orville's take on them.

We could have Q like beings that descended from planet that phased in and out of reality, while could have another ascended/sublimed civilisation that has ruins of its super advanced civilisation strewn about.
 
She appeared in the alternate timeline version (which was nice to see, though some dialogue almost felt like 4th wall breaking but I'm not going to think into it too much) and in their real universe they left a very open ending regarding medications and therapy needed. There's no reason she can't return as a regular or recurring character if she wanted to come back.
David Goodman indicated Alara likely won't be back as a regular, though he didn't rule out guest appearances in this interview:
One cool surprise for your episode was the reappearance of Halston Sage as Alara. Should we read anything into that if there is a season three?

Halston is a friend of the show. We love her and would definitely want to figure out ways that she can come back. I don’t think she is coming back as a regular. But, we love that character and we love her and so if there is an opportunity to bring her back story-wise, I think she would be open to it and we would love to have her back.
And as already noted above, Halston Sage is in the main cast of a show which has been picked up next season. So she definitely won't be coming back to Orville as a regular, and I wouldn't hold my breath on a guest appearance either.
One Kaylon episode, max. I loved what they did with them, but too much of a good thing ruins it.
They did a two part episode about the Kaylon in season 2, with them having a support role in the finale and their ships had a cameo in another episode. This is considered "too much Kaylon"?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top