Yes but my point is that onscreen dialogue does tell us that the M/A-M is in the nacelles/pods, so its either stored there in reserve or its moved there just before integration/reaction or some combination of both. And in any case, what’s in TMOST plays second fiddle to what’s onscreen.TMOST doesn't specify what fuel, but the only known fuels are the matter and anti-matter.
Sure, and this is part of the reason “Day of the Dove” is such a bone of contention, because Jefferies prepared the pressure compartment diagram showing his thinking that the engineering deck/section is in the secondary hull, even though the writer and editors –judging from the dialogue throughout- were following TMOST, or information based on it to the effect that engineering is in the primary hull/impulse engine area (thus spanning decks six and seven).And even if some people didn't put the care into season 3, Jefferies was still the art director and would have been consulted about the systems.
Well Probert is on record as saying he “forgot” about the matter side of the fuel equation when he was working out the design for TMP, so how it should really work with the matter fuel included is everyone’s guess, but my own two squandros worth is that the tanks at the bottom of the intermix shaft should be for matter fuel storage -with the anti-matter fuel kept in the nacelles- per long standing TOS tradition, this way the two fuel sources can meet in the middle, so to speak, and do their thing.Jefferies was back for Phase II and got things stated with Mike Minor helping and Andrew Probert taking over and Probert and Rick Sternbach tackling TNG. So there is a handoff of responsibility that makes looking at where things went to sort out TOS valid.
I didn't say I was discounting the third season, just evaluating the weight of evidence from two episodes written by the same writer who got the details wrong and wasn’t corrected, regardless of whether we chalk this up to dramatic necessity for those particular episodes.I'm sure that the rest of the production team didn't give up as much as Roddenberry had (he was the one massaging the stories to make them better and more consistent), so I don't think discounting the third season is valid.
Keep in mind here that dramatic license often trumps technical continuity, which is why I question the strength of evidentiary weight given to the two Lucas episodes, because they contradict the majority of evidence from all other sources at the time; onscreen, behind the scenes, and supplemental material.Who knows if the writers had been corrected or the technical advisors consulted. But if they spent time on it and the technical advisors were involved then we can be more certain of their intentions, even in season 3.
What came later with TMP holds even less weight because in-universe the engine system is a totally new design, and from a real world perspective, because what Probert designed was based on a “forgotten” (yet vital) piece of the puzzle.
But this is your project and you have every right to do any way you see fit, regardless of the ramblings of old fuddy-dutties like myself, so please don’t take my comments as an attempt to change your mind, keep up the good work.
Last edited: