And an unremarkable thing.Also a scene that showed holograms were definitely a thing in that era.
And an unremarkable thing.Also a scene that showed holograms were definitely a thing in that era.
Comes standard with the NX model, just like the cup holders.Holograms existed as far back as the 2150s when Malcolm used holographic remotes to train with phase pistols and/or EM pulse rifles. I'm still wondering how he rigged the armory with an early holoprojector but they nevertheless did exist more than a century before DSC.
I just want this discussion to be TRANSPORTED into area of plot holes!
I really would be grateful, if they tried to verbalize it at least a little.There is a big plot hole, as they could've transported Airiam directly to the brig. But could the brig have held her? I just go with the idea that Pike cycled through the options in his head and made the call he thought needed to be made.
Not perfect, but sometimes the drama makes the plot hole worthwhile.
Whereas I am always grateful when they resist the temptation to do so. Different strokes and all.I really would be grateful, if they tried to verbalize it at least a little.
I really would be grateful, if they tried to verbalize it at least a little.
I really would be grateful, if they tried to verbalize it at least a little.
There is a big plot hole, as they could've transported Airiam directly to the brig. But could the brig have held her? I just go with the idea that Pike cycled through the options in his head and made the call he thought needed to be made.
Not perfect, but sometimes the drama makes the plot hole worthwhile.
As Discovery has shown us time and time again, it isn't going to chew our food for us.
This isn't about chewing food though. It represents a really big plot hole. They beamed the team over, they obviously beamed the remaining team back.
Just because we are generally okay with how a scene plays out doesn't mean there aren't faults with how it was done.
Doesn't make it a plot hole.
Its a plot hole. Just because we like the end result doesn't mean there's not a massive logic problem with the scene.
In fact, I recall they mentioned it would be tough, since they couldn't sense life signs due to the prison being designed and built to not to allow unauthorized beam outs (obviously). That's why they had to resort to examining a schematic to try to figure out the best beam in point and get pretty close in range.
Airiam was too dangerous to allow back onto Discovery. Period. She had the means via her cyborg technology to disable and destroy Discovery if the CONTROL Program was able to keep controlling her. Airiam knew she'd be forced to kill her shipmates, knew her own tech capabilities and that the invading AI would not stop until it achieved its goal and thus made the decision to sacrifice herself rather than take that risk and endanger the ship again.
The lack of exactly this is what makes the show refreshing.that always comes with convoluted means to overcome the problem
I could do with less convoluted means to overcome the problem and have there be consequences for the actions, rather than it be fixed by the end.Then again, they could target her once was ejected from the station just as they saved Tyler (another double agent...) last season. OK, I can get she was dangerous, but this seemed like the case of sci-fi show that always comes with convoluted means to overcome the problem suddenly not having them becouse "that would not be realistic".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.