From the above:... more, recent stuff...
http://axamonitor.com/doku.php?id=t...b2ustZnKl5t8c_sEk-pubWjqlmtvogZol6FnVodQf9TeY
^^^^^In opposing defendants’ motion to dismiss his copyright case against CBS and Netflix, game developer Anas Abdin says his Tardigrades game and Star Trek: Discovery are substantially “the same production.
Not a new deadline."Wait!! Give more time to search all of CBS' records to find something, anything I can claim as a concrete connection!!!"
So the big deadline is now March 19th?
Pun intended?Not a new deadline.
It's the original date given by the Judge to finish the discovery period.
Ummmnn... Not intentionally, but I'll take credit for it.Pun intended?
Drink this Kool-Aid.Wait. So if "Any person watching the two works will instantly see the similarities and even think they are the same production." were true, wouldn't that mean that it's so self-evident that a deadline extension would be unnecessary?
What am I missing?
... It'll all become clear momentarily...Drink this Kool-Aid.
STD is in trouble having season three scaled back to a series of short treks. The Star Trek franchise is withering on the vine if not already dead.
probably Midnight's Cock or Doomedge or some channel like themHuh?
Season Three is already confirmed. Where are you getting the rumour of "a series of short treks" only?
With respect to the tartigrade, sounds like Abdin's attorneys want to frame the issue as a dispute about the similarities between the DSC Tartigrade and the Abdin Tartigrade, when the real issue is whether or not you can copyright a tartigrade. The former argument is a lot easier for Abdin to make.I think it's kinda funny that Abdin is still trying to get copyright protection for the actual look of a Tradigrade.
... the real issue is whether or not you can copyright a tartigrade.
And yet Hollywood studios have repeatedly contested such cases all the way through trial and multiple appeals, usually ending up winning. They take protecting their IP very seriously, and IP is a very "all or nuthin'" kind of issue; you can't half-own something like Star Trek.Because you think it will encourage others to file actions similar to Abdin's, right? But ask yourself what losing a case like this at trial would say to people? It would say that "you can win even with a weak case like this".
I can't disagree with you on this point. It's only prudent for a defendant and its legal counsel to constantly weigh costs/benefits surrounding legal action like this. But at this point, with no decision yet on CBS' motion to dismiss, there simply isn't enough data to press a case for settling. Acknowledging that it's always a possibility is an academic point right now.If the case is not dismissed, there is certainly at least a chance it will end up in trial. I have been trying to explain to you that that "chance" is where the settlement value is for CBS.
Despite a joint statement issued at the time of the settlement in which "Axanar and Mr. Peters acknowledge that both films were not approved by Paramount or CBS, and that both works crossed boundaries acceptable to CBS and Paramount relating to copyright law," Peters and his surrogates have refused to repeat their acknowledgement Axanar "crossed [copyright] boundaries."Having Peters admit copyright infringement let the fans know that no matter how we may feel about CBS, they were within their rights in filing the lawsuit. Last thing they wanted was to make it look like big bad CBS was destroying this "little" Trek fan. Very bad optics.
I wouldn't characterize Abdin's argument quite like that. His pleading last week opposing CBS' motion to dismiss tries to make it seem that CBS' argument is that Abdin cannot copyright tardigrades as they exist in nature, and how stupid CBS must be to make that argument.With respect to the tartigrade, sounds like Abdin's attorneys want to frame the issue as a dispute about the similarities between the DSC Tartigrade and the Abdin Tartigrade, when the real issue is whether or not you can copyright a tartigrade. The former argument is a lot easier for Abdin to make. Doubt CBS will fall into this trap.
He still must prove access; he can't, probably because it was extremely unlikely anyone working hard on Discovery did the digging necessary to find his game idea.Wait. So if "Any person watching the two works will instantly see the similarities and even think they are the same production." were true, wouldn't that mean that it's so self-evident that a deadline extension would be unnecessary?
What am I missing?
Or even accidentally come over it.He still must prove access; he can't, probably because it was extremely unlikely anyone working hard on Discovery did the digging necessary to find his game idea.
Tardigrades rule by Ian McLean, on Flickr
I only found out about this due to this thread, but that's because the only games I play are South Park: The Stick of Truth and Lego Harry Potter.Or even accidentally come over it.
I had problems finding his stuff on STEAM even after it had been voted up for continued "game" consideration in the "Greenlight" contest.
It wasn't until all this started becoming way more public that it began to turn up easier in searches.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.