Seeing that in S1E1 made me immediately wonder whether Isaac's people are remotely humanoid in appearance.He's an alien machine wearing a human suit.
Seeing that in S1E1 made me immediately wonder whether Isaac's people are remotely humanoid in appearance.He's an alien machine wearing a human suit.
Topa's rapid aging has made me wonder how old Bortus and Klyden are supposed to be. Theoretically they could be in their twenties or thirties.I like that they've "TV-aged" Topa without so much as a passing justification regarding "Moclan biology," and I hope they continue to leave that alone.![]()
TNG tried and failed to do stories like this. See: "The Outcast."
TNG tried and failed to do stories like this. See: "The Outcast."
"Daring" only in the sense that prior to 2016 it was Star Trek's only attempt at LGBT issues that wasn't treating the matter as a joke (like DS9's Mirror Universe Lesbians) but besides that it's pretty routine. If they really wanted to be daring, they could have started by having Riker's love interest played by a man.In retrospect, as an adult, today, sure.
Nearly 30 years ago, to a tween, it was daring, creative and on the fringe.
"Daring" only in the sense that prior to 2016 it was Star Trek's only attempt at LGBT issues that wasn't treating the matter as a joke (like DS9's Mirror Universe Lesbians) but besides that it's pretty routine. If they really wanted to be daring, they could have started by having Riker's love interest played by a man.
Roddenberry's track record for decades on LGBTQ matters was occasional lip service and utter non performance.Exactly--I remember thinking the same thing, that is was a cheat that the actor wasn't a man. I imagine the in story reason would be that since Riker was VERY hetero it would make more sense that he would be attracted to a traditionally more feminine personality.
I seem to remember reading that at the time, just prior to Roddenberry's death, he was planning on introducing same sex couples on the Enterprise. Not as main characters, but in the background. The intention was not to make it a main issue on the show but by having same sex couples as window dressing it would show that it was just not anything special in the 24th century.
There was no Network overwatch.
Thousands of deals with thousands of mom and pop affiliates.
What would the FCC had done to Rodenberry if two blokes in space were macking on each other?
"Daring" only in the sense that prior to 2016 it was Star Trek's only attempt at LGBT issues that wasn't treating the matter as a joke
As I understand the disappearance of the manskirts was mostly related to the removal of the skirt uniform variant all together, which wasn't particularly popular to begin with. Though I'll be honest, I thought it looked better on Deanna than the outfit she wore for the rest of the first season.What was the deal with men in miniskirts, and where did they all go after season two?
Okay, fine. Two attempts at LGBT matters prior to 2016, and both of them allegorical. That's still a bad statistic for a franchise which prides itself on being progressive and inclusive to all aspects of humanity.That's not entirely true. 1995's "Rejoined" had Dax exploring a relationship that Trill society finds distasteful. And the fact that they are both women is unremarkable to remind everyone what the story was an allegory for.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.