• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Just how old is Capt Pike? (based on 1 line in Saints of Imperfection)

Case in point: In the latest DISCO novel, teenage runaway Sylvia Tilly ends up working her way across the quadrant, while scrounging for a living with only a few credits to her name, which makes for much more interesting tale than a story about her blithely making her way through a "post-scarcity" society . . .

On the other hand, Tilly was outside the Federation, and the people on those planets seemed to regard every Fed national they'd seen pass through as a fancy-pants rich person (though that probably says more about how hardscrabble those planets were, and not that it's just a coincidence we never saw Joseph Sisko in his vacationing outfit made of fine silks and large jewels).
 
From: https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Personnel_file

latest
Well that's better.
 
If there's no currency in the 24th Century...

How did Dr. Crusher purchase the bolt of fabric that magically appeared before her on Farpoint Station?
(which she then had beamed up to her quarters)
:confused:

From Memory Alpha...

"While Beverly and Wesley Crusher were shopping at the mall of Farpoint Station in 2364, they witnessed how the fabric of one of the Bandi shopkeepers changed to please Beverly as she said before. As a result she purchased the entire bolt and had it sent up to the USS ENTERPRISE. (TNG: Encounter at Farpoint)"
 
Last edited:
If there's no currency in the 24th Century...

How did Dr. Crusher purchase the bolt of fabric that magically appeared before her on Farpoint Station?
(which she then had beamed up to her quarters)
:confused:

From Memory Alpha...

"While Beverly and Wesley Crusher were shopping at the mall of Farpoint Station in 2364, they witnessed how the fabric of one of the Bandi shopkeepers changed to please Beverly as she said before. As a result she purchased the entire bolt and had it sent up to the USS ENTERPRISE. (TNG: Encounter at Farpoint)"
Uh...

Picard lied to Lily! :eek: He was actually voicing his own wishes for a galaxy without money, hoping that telling Lily about such a system would cause her and Zefram Cochrane to actually implement it.

As such, there was money in Star Trek before First Contact! And then, after Picard changed the timeline in First Contact, Lily set in motion a series of events leading to the New World Economy where there was never any money in Trek and all such mentions of money are the result of an older timeline. :p
 
"The Federation has invested a great deal of money in our training, they're about due for a small return" said Kirk to Spock in "Errand of Mercy"

These days I tend to see Trek productions as their own versions of the universe. TOS is especially rife with money references, the movies too (Scotty bought a boat in STVI, McCoy is trying to barter a flight to Genesis in III etc) with the exception of IV, which could even be finessed to be a reference to paper money.

Then Next Gen, Voyager and DS9 took the STIV reference (after "Farpoint") and ran with it.:shrug:

Orci and Kurtzman said the Kelvin universe definitely had some form of currency in interviews for ST'09, since Kirk tried to buy Uhura's drinks. Kurtzman has brought a heavy Kelvin influence to Disco, so it's possible they have money too.

Certainly Disco isn't post-scarcity, hence Stamets and Reno's little argument about Dilithium.
 
Star Trek isn't post-scarcity. Not even close. People need to stop saying it is.
Yes, it is. (TOS somewhat less so—at least out on the frontier—inasmuch as replicator technology apparently hasn't quite been perfected yet, but TNG very much so.)

Consider. If you live on Earth (or any other major Federation world), the tech level means you have essentially free unlimited access to...
  • Food
  • Clothing
  • Shelter
  • Transportation
  • Education
  • Health care
  • Entertainment
...in whatever form and variety may suit your needs or preferences. If that's not post-scarcity, what would you call it?

Sure, if you want to get away from the status quo and seek more adventure, you can go join Starfleet — or if that's not your thing (or you don't make the cut), join up to help settle some colony world — and go do things by hand and deal with people (and aliens) who aren't part of your socioeconomic system. But if you stay at home, you're free to pursue whatever floats your boat to the best of your abilities, whether it's science or archaeology or viticulture or gourmet cooking or musical performance or what-have-you. Complete freedom, because the supply of Stuff so vastly exceeds the supply of labor necessary to create it.

And with nothing to regulate these things [i.e., the few limited skills and resources that remain] who/what determines who is granted access to them?
Who knows? Nobody said there's "nothing to regulate these things." Presumably there's some sort of fair and democratic system in place. It might, in fact, even be some carefully regulated form of "market" (since one thing markets are actually pretty good at doing is efficiently allocating the distribution of fungible private goods with high demand elasticity). That still doesn't require the use of "money" as we know it today.

Yeah, where did this whole "post-scarcity" notion come from? I don't remember this term or concept ever being thrown around on the original show, let alone being as intrinsic to the franchise as people keep suggesting.
Well, the term itself wasn't coined until the mid-'80s (AFAIK), and didn't really gain widespread usage until the past decade, so it's no surprise that it wasn't thrown around in Trek. Nonetheless, the overall future society it posits seems to fit the definition.

By contrast, every third episode of TOS seemed to involve the Enterprise or some distant colony being in desperate need of some vital element, medicine, piece of technology, etc, because of a plague, famine, or whatever. ... Just look at "Devil in the Dark," one of the quintessential STAR TREK episodes: not only are the miners hoping to strike it rich, not only is the Federation in urgent need of pergium (as Kirk constantly reminds us), but when a vital mechanical component is stolen, Scotty can't just easily replicate another and the whole life-support system starts breaking down.
Yes, because in "DITD" the setting fits the "remote outpost on the frontier" scenario and the Pergium fits the "dilithium-like plot-driven Unobtanium" scenario that I've already acknowledged as exceptions to the general scheme of things. By the very nature of the Enterprise's mission, the ship and crew are going to run into a disproportionately large number of scenarios that are "outliers" compared to the status quo on fully civilized Federation worlds. That doesn't mean we should generalize from the outliers.

I guess since he didn't get paid either, Joseph sisko just really loved making creole food.
Well, yeah, that's exactly what I've always assumed. Do you think he does it out of the need to make a living because otherwise he'd be homeless and starving? On Earth of all places?
 
Consider. If you live on Earth (or any other major Federation world), the tech level means you have essentially free unlimited access to...
  • Food
  • Clothing
  • Shelter
  • Transportation
  • Education
  • Health care
  • Entertainment
...in whatever form and variety may suit your needs or preferences. If that's not post-scarcity, what would you call it?
Humane socio-economic policy?

Any UBI proponent would argue the technology exists to do all those things now, even with the resources available - or even that it's a moral imperative. It would take an impossible - by all practicality - redistribution or wealth and resources to do so but it could still be done within the framework of scarcity and currency-based economics. I mean, talk about 'doing it in fifty years' - imagine if humanity got its collective ass up out of its Lay-Z-Boy the evening of September 8, 1966, and said: "Hold my beer."

And that's always been my biggest problem with the no money thing. Because 'money' and profit motive are ultimately mutually exclusive. Yet Star Trek treats them as symptoms of the same problem. However, I would argue that the much more meaningful and powerful message would be showing humanity figuring out how to do all those things without the need for magical energy/matter converters and chance meetings with the local Ambassador Pointy-Ears.
 
Could it be that just humans have moved beyond currency?

A Bank of Bolia and I think Betazed have been mentioned in a couple episodes
 
Humane socio-economic policy?

Any UBI proponent would argue the technology exists to do all those things now, even with the resources available - or even that it's a moral imperative. It would take an impossible - by all practicality - redistribution or wealth and resources to do so but it could still be done within the framework of scarcity and currency-based economics.
Well, yes. Most (if not all) of this could be achieved today, and it would be a far more just society. The tricky (not impossible, but indeed tricky) part would be the transition. People who have hoarded wealth and power do tend to cling to it, after all.

Still, there's nothing inevitable about our current economic paradigm. It's neither necessary nor sufficient to meet real human needs. Lots of alternatives exist. More than a few of them have been written about in SF. You're a fan of SF; surely you're familiar with some?

And that's always been my biggest problem with the no money thing. Because 'money' and profit motive are ultimately mutually exclusive. Yet Star Trek treats them as symptoms of the same problem. However, I would argue that the much more meaningful and powerful message would be showing humanity figuring out how to do all those things without the need for magical energy/matter converters and chance meetings with the local Ambassador Pointy-Ears.
Not mutually exclusive at all — they're intricately intertwined! — although, perhaps, not necessarily a matched set; it's possible to imagine either one without the other. FWIW, Star Trek's reality has greatly reduced (if not completely done away with) the power of both. But Trek isn't a show about "people figuring out how to do these things," as Greg points out; it offers a setting where these things have been done, and our present-day problems have been solved, and the resulting society is merely a backdrop for the stories of people seeking out challenging and exciting new problems.

I have no problem with that. Other works (both fiction and non) can and do focus on that "much more meaningful and powerful message."
 
Yes, it is. (TOS somewhat less so—at least out on the frontier—inasmuch as replicator technology apparently hasn't quite been perfected yet, but TNG very much so.)

Consider. If you live on Earth (or any other major Federation world), the tech level means you have essentially free unlimited access to...
  • Food
  • Clothing
  • Shelter
  • Transportation
  • Education
  • Health care
  • Entertainment
That depends how the system of private replicator technology works. I can see it being organized similar to how internet and wi-fi are organized now. a very high percentage has wi-fi at home and/or at work or uses it in a coffeeshop, just like people would have replicators at home, at work or at Quark's. That doesn't mean it is free. The coffeeshop owner has to pay for the wi-fi that you use, at home, depending on your dataplan, you pay a certain amount of money for a certain amount of free data per month and at work the corporation you work for has their own dataplan they pay. If replicators allow for a certain amount of mass being materialized per month for a specific fee (and everything over that amount costs extra), I'd guess Starfleet as a huge ass military organization might have a better deal with the replicator company than civilists in their homes.
 
But the notion of "paying" for such a thing — specifically, of paying for something that can be provided at almost any scale for negligible marginal cost (like wifi) — suggests that someone is engaged in rent-seeking, looking to derive profit from the basic needs of others. More broadly, and problematically, it suggests that the profit motive still exists. When Trek characters talk about money being a thing of the past, that is what I envision their society having done away with. Hoarding personal profit is what motivates narrow-minded cultures like the Ferengi. The Federation is more civilized.

(There may still be a few "rich" people on Federation worlds... but those people would be recognized as anachronisms. Similarly, a few countries on Earth today still have formal monarchs and nobility and so forth, but that status is mostly symbolic, and no longer carries the kind of genuine power it once did.)
 
The writers have been incredibly inconsistent on this point, so why don't we just say the Federation has no money on Sundays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and alternate Saturdays (Earth calendar, natch), and has money on Monday, Wednesday, Friday and alternate Saturdays?
 
The writers have been incredibly inconsistent on this point, so why don't we just say the Federation has no money on Sundays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and alternate Saturdays (Earth calendar, natch), and has money on Monday, Wednesday, Friday and alternate Saturdays?
As a kid of divorced parents, I approve this notion
 
Could it be that just humans have moved beyond currency?

A Bank of Bolia and I think Betazed have been mentioned in a couple episodes
Maybe our system of money is eradicated in favor of some bizarre future version of bitcoin? I'll call it fitcoin. When Picard says, we work to better ourselves, maybe every Federation citizen has a chip installed that tracks neural connections, physical health, etc.

Working out, learning new languages and advanced science, performing tasks, etc. is loaded into a chip installed in every person. Personal improvement is the new bitcoin mining, called fitcoin mining. The more you work out and study, the more fitcoins you have.

Thus, when Picard says people work to better themselves, they are just mining more fitcoins. All other currency (dollars, renminbi, euros, even bitcoins) are eliminated in favor of fitcoins. Thus you reconcile statements saying there is no money since the late 22nd century with the obvious references to money in TOS etc.

Those money references are references to fitcoins, which people earn through bettering themselves.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top