Do you think we need an oath of office to be on Star Trek staff? O_o
Once again, you jest...but the reality is that there are people who would welcome this, combined with extensive background and genetic testing.
Do you think we need an oath of office to be on Star Trek staff? O_o
Yeah, I'm only halfway joking because I know that there are several who would want this. It smacks of the "true Trek" talk that flies around, which cannot be defined.Once again, you jest...but the reality is that there are people who would welcome this, combined with extensive background and genetic testing.
Sometime the canon sucks and should be chucked.
Well, that could be a blessing in disguise, as that would actually give you a reason not to post here and be all despondent over the things you don't care for.Yeah it's a pretty disappointing series. Never thought I would even think it but I may have to actually boycott this series
This is a silly argument. Just because holograms were not featured heavily in TOS doesn't mean they couldn't have existed in the 23rd century, rather it's simply because a 1960s TV show was not able to depict such a thing at the time.
The Enterprise in TOS is not the Flagship of the Federation, or any flagship. I do not believe the TOS Enterprise is ever called a flagship at all, and that honorific is saved for TNG and the Enterprise D.Unfortunately, let's get beyond the veneer and dig into the bigger issues being bandied about: I'm just hoping the season 2 extravaganza deals with nutter Spock escaping the nuthouse and killing three of his doctors. There must be a really great reason that ties up loose ends and explains how Spock would end up on the Federation Flagship (on top of everything else)
Uh, have you watched Star Trek? Spock has attempted to kill his Captain on at least two occasions, committed mutiny twice, forged orders, hijacked a starship and kidnapped a superior officer. And he's still an officer in good standing and the best First Officer in the fleet.There must be a really great reason that ties up loose ends and explains how Spock would end up on the Federation Flagship
The Enterprise in TOS is not the Flagship of the Federation, or any flagship. I do not believe the TOS Enterprise is ever called a flagship at all, and that honorific is saved for TNG and the Enterprise D.
Do you think we need an oath of office to be on Star Trek staff? O_o
I don’t think he did. I think S31 did and blamed him as a cover for kidnapping him.I'm just hoping the season 2 extravaganza deals with nutter Spock escaping the nuthouse and killing three of his doctors
I'm just hoping the season 2 extravaganza deals with nutter Spock escaping the nuthouse and killing three of his doctors.
No, Spock is a murderer, What other explanation could there be?????Has it occurred to you that he might be being framed for the deaths? You know, by like a secret rogue agency, that might want to use him to find a possible threat to the security of the federation?
That's different...don't ask me how. It's just like all the charges that Kirk had and yet somehow escaped prosecution and continued to serve in Starfleet.Uh, have you watched Star Trek? Spock has attempted to kill his Captain on at least two occasions, committed mutiny twice, forged orders, hijacked a starship and kidnapped a superior officer.
I have a feeling Spock will turn out to be neither a nutter (at least not a major one) nor a murderer, which is why there will be no problem with him ending up on the Enterprise....I'm just hoping the season 2 extravaganza deals with nutter Spock escaping the nuthouse and killing three of his doctors. There must be a really great reason that ties up loose ends and explains how Spock would end up on the Federation Flagship....
Right...because we never saw that in Trek before...
Good writers are able to write great stuff without treating canon like it's a disease. Then again, Alex Kurtzman is making neither canon or story a priority, so I guess he should read your post
To be fair, even if father is a murderer by Spock's OWN ADMISSION:No, Spock is a murderer, What other explanation could there be?????
^^^KIRK: You're saying he couldn't have done it?
SPOCK: No, Captain. I'm merely saying it would be illogical to kill without reason.
KIRK: But if he had a reason, could he have done it?
SPOCK: If there were a reason, my father is quite capable of killing. Logically and efficiently.
The way that guy frames his videos, you'd think holograms didn't exist in TOS era...
The "If there were a reason..." was likely a "big IF".To be fair, even if father is a murderer by Spock's OWN ADMISSION:
TOS S2 - "Journey To Babel"
http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/44.htm
^^^
So, like father, like son?![]()
He says" "...my father is quite capable of killing..."<--- And very matter of fact-ly too; meaning either Spock has seen Sarek do so, or is aware of instances where Sarek did do so (obviously with good reason, or I assume he'd be in a prison on Vulcan somewhere.)The "If there were a reason..." was likely a "big IF".
I don't think Spock was admitting anything; rather he was just building a logical argument, and then pointing out Sarek has the physical capacity.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.