_______
51st Anniversary Cinematic Special
Guess Who's Coming to Dinner
Starring Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, Katharine Hepburn, Katharine Houghton, Cecil Kellaway, Beah Richards, and Roy E. Glenn
Directed by Stanley Kramer
Premiered December 11, 1967; General release: December 12, 1967
Winner of 1968 Academy Awards for Best Actress in a Leading Role (Katharine Hepburn) and Best Writing, Story and Screenplay - Written Directly for the Screen (William Rose); Nominated for Best Picture, Best Actor in a Leading Role (Spencer Tracy), Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Cecil Kellaway), Best Actress in a Supporting Role (Beah Richards), Best Director (Stanley Kramer), Best Art Direction-Set Decoration (Robert Clatworthy, Frank Tuttle), Best Film Editing (Robert C. Jones), and Best Music, Scoring of Music, Adaptation or Treatment (Frank De Vol)
I've always though of this as a Sidney Poitier film, but I guess Tracy and Hepburn were kind of a big deal as well. Poitier certainly seemed to think so....
Mr. Drayton doesn't bat an eyelash when he thinks Dr. Prentice is just an acquaintance of his daughter's, and he makes clear that he has no issues with John as a person. It's how the rest of the world will treat the couple that most concerns him. That a marriage between John and Joanna would be against the law in several states (at the time the film was being made) comes up in the story. There's a 14-year age difference as well, but I think that was actually more acceptable in those days than it is now, oddly enough.
Sign o' the times reference...

It's a nice touch that Tillie the maid (whom I didn't recognize as future "Mrs. J" Isabel Sanford) is more openly disapproving of the relationship that anyone. Movies! cut out a use of what I assume was the N-word from her.
Mrs. Drayton firing Hilary on the spot following her reaction is a good moment:
Love that last line!
The title of the film isn't figurative; a dinner that expands to include the couple and both sets of parents is the dramatic centerpiece. The fathers are on the same page about the relationship, as are the mothers with their respective page. The drama is intensified by a ticking clock...John makes an agreement with the Draytons that if they have any reservations, he'll call the wedding off. But Joanna, not knowing about this, has decided at the last minute to leave with John on an overseas trip that he's making that night, thus putting her parents in the position of having to yea or nay the marriage that night.
John gives his father a nice speech about generational differences, even though the younger Prentice is well over 30:
In the climax, the situation is resolved by a big speech of Mr. Drayton's, presented in part here:
Compared to the other two 1967 Poitier films I've watched, this one is slow and talky with a limited setting that they should have invested more in. The painted backdrop of the Bay at the Drayton home is distractingly obvious. The music was a little easy listening, with lots of instrumental variations of "The Glory of Love" in the score. There was an admirable attempt at groovy music with sitar playing in the delivery boy's van. And Monsignor Ryan gives the Beatles a shout-out!
_______
51st Anniversary Cinematic Special
Guess Who's Coming to Dinner
Starring Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, Katharine Hepburn, Katharine Houghton, Cecil Kellaway, Beah Richards, and Roy E. Glenn
Directed by Stanley Kramer
Premiered December 11, 1967; General release: December 12, 1967
Winner of 1968 Academy Awards for Best Actress in a Leading Role (Katharine Hepburn) and Best Writing, Story and Screenplay - Written Directly for the Screen (William Rose); Nominated for Best Picture, Best Actor in a Leading Role (Spencer Tracy), Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Cecil Kellaway), Best Actress in a Supporting Role (Beah Richards), Best Director (Stanley Kramer), Best Art Direction-Set Decoration (Robert Clatworthy, Frank Tuttle), Best Film Editing (Robert C. Jones), and Best Music, Scoring of Music, Adaptation or Treatment (Frank De Vol)
Wiki said:Guess Who's Coming to Dinner is a 1967 American comedy-drama film produced and directed by Stanley Kramer, and written by William Rose. It stars Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, and Katharine Hepburn, and features Hepburn's niece Katharine Houghton.
The film was one of the few films of the time to depict an interracial marriage in a positive light, as interracial marriage historically had been illegal in most states of the United States, and still was illegal in 17 states—mostly Southern states—until 12 June 1967, six months before the film was released, roughly two weeks after Tracy filmed his final scene (and two days after his death), when anti-miscegenation laws were struck down by the Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia. The film's Oscar-nominated score was composed by Frank De Vol.
The film is notable for being the ninth and final on-screen pairing of Tracy and Hepburn, with filming ending just 17 days before Tracy's death. Hepburn never saw the completed film, saying the memories of Tracy were too painful. The film was released in December 1967, six months after his death. In 2017, the film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".
I've always though of this as a Sidney Poitier film, but I guess Tracy and Hepburn were kind of a big deal as well. Poitier certainly seemed to think so....
Wiki said:Poitier frequently found himself starstruck and as a result, a bit tongue-tied, in the presence of Hepburn and Tracy, whom he considered to be "giants" as far as acting is concerned. However, Poitier reportedly found a way to overcome his nerves. "When I went to play a scene with Tracy and Hepburn, I couldn't remember a word. Finally, Stanley Kramer said to me, 'What are we going to do?' I said, 'Stanley, send those two people home. I will play the scene against two empty chairs. I don't want them here because I can't handle that kind of company.' He sent them home. I played the scene in close-up against two empty chairs as the dialogue coach read Mr. Tracy's and Miss Hepburn's lines from off camera."
Mr. Drayton doesn't bat an eyelash when he thinks Dr. Prentice is just an acquaintance of his daughter's, and he makes clear that he has no issues with John as a person. It's how the rest of the world will treat the couple that most concerns him. That a marriage between John and Joanna would be against the law in several states (at the time the film was being made) comes up in the story. There's a 14-year age difference as well, but I think that was actually more acceptable in those days than it is now, oddly enough.
Sign o' the times reference...
Even more sign o' the times--at one point Mr. Drayton compares the situation to "if Joey came home with some fuzzy-wuzzy," implying that he'd draw the line at a damn, dirty hippie!Joanna said:Even if you had any objections, I wouldn't let him go now if...you were the Governor of Alabama!

It's a nice touch that Tillie the maid (whom I didn't recognize as future "Mrs. J" Isabel Sanford) is more openly disapproving of the relationship that anyone. Movies! cut out a use of what I assume was the N-word from her.
Mrs. Drayton firing Hilary on the spot following her reaction is a good moment:
Love that last line!

The title of the film isn't figurative; a dinner that expands to include the couple and both sets of parents is the dramatic centerpiece. The fathers are on the same page about the relationship, as are the mothers with their respective page. The drama is intensified by a ticking clock...John makes an agreement with the Draytons that if they have any reservations, he'll call the wedding off. But Joanna, not knowing about this, has decided at the last minute to leave with John on an overseas trip that he's making that night, thus putting her parents in the position of having to yea or nay the marriage that night.
John gives his father a nice speech about generational differences, even though the younger Prentice is well over 30:
In the climax, the situation is resolved by a big speech of Mr. Drayton's, presented in part here:
Compared to the other two 1967 Poitier films I've watched, this one is slow and talky with a limited setting that they should have invested more in. The painted backdrop of the Bay at the Drayton home is distractingly obvious. The music was a little easy listening, with lots of instrumental variations of "The Glory of Love" in the score. There was an admirable attempt at groovy music with sitar playing in the delivery boy's van. And Monsignor Ryan gives the Beatles a shout-out!
_______
Nobody's saying that he didn't. The assertion by the song's Wiki article was that it was one of his last major contributions before leaving the band, not that it was his only contribution in their entire career. It goes on to quote Jagger on this point from an interview: "That was the last time I remember Brian really being totally involved in something that was really worth doing." The article for the album paints a picture of Jones having been mostly sidelined at this point, with his contributions having become inconsistent and often irrelevant to what was being worked on.Brian has more contributions to Stones tracks (depending on what studio source you refer to)
By whom? Not by the record-buying public of 1968-69, who put the White Album at the top of the Billboard album chart for a total of nine weeks, while Beggars peaked at #5 for three weeks. Not by the rock musicians, critics, and industry figures who voted for Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time, which ranks the White Album #10 and Beggars #57.and is certainly held in higher regard (deservedly so) than The Beatles/White Album.
I didn't say that, RJ did.By your criteria of "quit while they were ahead,"
I think that you are. But regardless of the terminology used, my point was that MMT had the through-line device of the bus tour to hang its randomness on. Head was just random. I'll grant you that Head had more to say than MMT did, but that's a separate thing from the point that I was trying to make.You're misinterpreting what a theme and plot is.
Aw, I like that one.The year was off to kind of a slow start.
I learned when looking into the song that Al Hirt also gave us the TV version of the Green Hornet theme.This is pretty catchy.
Last edited: