• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Wars I-III, Gotham, and DSC: a study in prequels (and how DSC isn’t a TOS prequel?)

Star Trek isn't a house
Spock looks like Spock. Ethan Peck is just an actor playing Spock.
The Enterprise will look like that until it doesn't.
The classic uniforms aren't wrong, they've just updated the look.

Your post is almost a text book example of trying to be offended for the sake of being offended. :lol:
Dial back a bit, you're going OTT. The shtick works better when it's not at 11. :)
I'm not offended. But I think they're being silly trying to force a square peg in a round hole while saying "the hole's always been square! Round holes aren't canon!"
 
"Prime" is the person. Everything else is nothing but the wardrobe.

Kelvin is the obnoxious - yet somehow awesome - hipster sibling.
 
"Prime" is the person. Everything else is nothing but the wardrobe.

Kelvin is the obnoxious - yet somehow awesome - hipster sibling.

Wouldn't "Prime" be the hipster? Trying to constantly reinvent itself to be cool but always acting like it isn't a slave to fads. ;)
 
Wouldn't "Prime" be the hipster? Trying to constantly reinvent itself to be cool but always acting like it isn't a slave to fads. ;)
Nah, Prime is your dad trying to be hip and down with the kids. :p
ZeOurgW.jpg
 
Because it's just a TV show. A fictional concept that is mutable with changing times.
Censorship or rewriting history doesn't sit well with me. I realise it's just a fictional world, but it seems disrespectful to everyone's efforts in creating that show to see it being replaced piece by piece. And unfair to the fans with an emotional investment in those characters and that world to try and replace the old rather than to say it's a new version of Trek, as every other franchise does.
 
Censorship or rewriting history doesn't sit well with me. I realise it's just a fictional world, but it seems disrespectful to everyone's efforts in creating that show to see it being replaced piece by piece. And unfair to the fans with an emotional investment in those characters and that world to try and replace the old rather than to say it's a new version of Trek, as every other franchise does.
Since its not history and nothing is being censored, I don't see the point.
Those peoples work is right there for anyone to see. I can pop in a disc or open a streaming app and see their work anytime I want. No one is destroying the disc and buring the masters.
Come on, continuity gets updated and changed all the time in entertainment media. At DC and Marvel it's a called day ending in "Y". And at the same time they're issuing collectors trades of all the old stuff. There's no one way to do it.
Once again you're going into OTT mode.
 
Last edited:
Censorship or rewriting history doesn't sit well with me
Of course neither of those things are happening. TOS is the same as it's always been, remastering aside of course, which has nothing to do with Discovery. Nothing Discovery can say or show can change any element of what has gone before. TOS, ENT, bloody Nemesis. It's all in the can already.
 
Censorship or rewriting history doesn't sit well with me. I realise it's just a fictional world, but it seems disrespectful to everyone's efforts in creating that show to see it being replaced piece by piece. And unfair to the fans with an emotional investment in those characters and that world to try and replace the old rather than to say it's a new version of Trek, as every other franchise does.
As much as I agree with your sentiment here, I’ve come to understand the following about Star Trek (illustrated nicely by the quote below) :

Of course neither of those things are happening. TOS is the same as it's always been, remastering aside of course, which has nothing to do with Discovery. Nothing Discovery can say or show can change any element of what has gone before. TOS, ENT, bloody Nemesis. It's all in the can already.
Every contradictory issue in the franchise is simultaneously valid and invalid until a character explicitly addresses it.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d prefer a more TOS-suggestive DSC too. But DSC is perfectly fine until the characters say it’s not. Like the Klingons until “trials”.

I’m going with the “infer things based on previous examples” methodology for rationalising DSC at the minute. We know ships had refits - so the Enterprise probably had a refit. It seems too extreme an explanation to be plausible in the show (apparently) but in my head it works fine since we know (from TOS) that Enterprise had at least one refit in her lifetime.

As such, no history is rewritten until Michael or someone says it is. It just exists simultaneously alongside the original and is both correct and incorrect at the same time. Just like pink tribbles. And the Harry Kim from the Voyager that was blown up to stop the Vidiians. Probably.
 
See this is why I enjoy discussing DSC with you as you see these kinds of links - I missed a lot of these the first time round, I suppose my initial dislike of DSC had me with blinkers on :lol:
I'm very happy I could help you enjoy it more, even if only a little! At times I've felt myself to be well and truly wasting my time even attempting to battle the tide negativity that frequently encroaches here. (Not to suggest that's unique to this board by any means, nor that there aren't just as many perfectly valid criticisms to be offered up with respect to DSC as there are of any previous Trek series. I don't mean to smear anyone with too broad a brush, even if I may unfortunately come off that way on some days!) But your comments, among others, make me feel it is at least somewhat worthwhile.:)

I guess the only point I’d make here is that “magic” seemed to be the only one that could be considered a direct prequel at the end - but it’s not as though that episode was “how mudd learned of the beauty drug and decided to become a sex trafficker”, so it wasn’t a direct prequel to that episode. More of a prequel to Mudd the character that fleshed out his unexpected backstory.
That's why I said "I, Mudd" (TOS) instead of "Mudd's Women" (TOS). "Magic To Make..." directly sets up his relationship with Stella as depicted there.;)

I’d say the same for “Lethe” insofar as I don’t think they sat down and thought “let’s write a prequel to journey to Babel”. The interactions we see in that episode are more about Sarek and Micheal than they are about Sarek and Spock. The links to TOS seem more incidental than a deliberate attempt to write the story behind a particular episode.
Apologies for the essay here...

When we watch "Journey To Babel" (TOS) now, we are granted a deeper and better understanding of why Sarek was so upset with Spock over his choice to join Starfleet. It was never quite so simple as what Amanda suggests (in her own incomplete understanding as something of an outsider, despite having long lived among Vulcans), i.e. that Sarek merely wanted his son to follow traditional Vulcan beliefs as handed down through the generations. It's a lot more complex than that, as pretty much everything else we saw portrayed of Sarek up to now, both there and elsewhere, already suggested.

DSC further reinforces for us that Sarek, quite in contrast to most Vulcans, finds the embracing of humans—in all senses—to be eminently logical and desirable. He is something of a maverick in that regard (as perhaps indeed his father Skon and grandfather Solkar, who respectively translated Vulcan works into English and acted as the first Vulcan ambassador to Earth, per ENT, were too, so Amanda isn't totally wrong) and in "Lethe" is shown to have faced in his day the same sort of xenophobic resistance from his peers as that seen on display in both earlier (as central running theme in ENT) and later (in stories like "The Gambit" [TNG] and "Take Me Out To The Holosuite" [DS9]) times. Such prejudices die hard, and all the more so in cultures that steadfastly refuse to acknowledge and openly address them.

Sarek hoped to play a part in dispelling such attitudes through the introduction of both Michael and Spock to the Vulcan Science Academy, seeing in them the capacity to be agents of change. But he was ultimately thwarted in this aim, first trading away Michael's opportunity to attend in favor of Spock's, and then being further faced with Spock's rejection of it. Having essentially capitulated to the unreasonable strictures of this racist establishment to no purpose, Sarek naturally felt both guilty and resentful. He then projected these feelings of frustration at his own failure onto Spock.

This further ties in with what we later learn in STIII-V, and in "Sarek" and "Unification" (TNG). Despite never intending to, Sarek drove all his children away from him, and caused each in turn to feel they had failed him, when in fact he knew full well that it was he who had failed them. By not acknowledging his true emotions and their source, he led Spock to mistakenly believe that he was a disappointment to his father because he was "so human" and not Vulcan enough, despite the fact that Sarek actually felt love, pride, and even envy of his son, as he later revealed to Picard (and eventually, though him, to Spock). And he could never fully express such feelings to Amanda, either, even though she obviously picked up a sense of them, and says as much "Journey To Babel" (TOS). This is why when Picard is feeling Sarek's regrets, they are mentioned, but Michael is not: because in the course of DSC's first season he and Michael came to reach a lasting emotional understanding that resolved any such regrets with respect to her.

The gulf between him and Spock, however, was deeper and wider, and persisted even beyond their repeated attempts to bridge it. Even though "Journey To Babel" and The Voyage Home showed some promise and progress toward this end, and The Final Frontier showed us that Spock in time learned not to be ruled by his underlying feelings of inadequacy, the misunderstanding nevertheless lingered on beneath the surface, eventually giving rise to a renewed rift in TNG. (Their argument over the Cardassian War would surely have been but a catalyst.)

If father and son had ever melded, this might well have been eased, but they never did—and here again, Michael's part in the story may have played a role. When Sarek melded with Burnham as a child to save her life, he left part of his katra, essentially his soul, with her. This itself could have contributed to Spock's perception of distance between them as well; Sarek could never give all of himself to his son, because it was no longer fully his to give. And since Sarek's long-distance communication with Burnham in "Battle At The Binary Stars" (DSC) was stated to come at a high physical cost, it might have even laid the groundwork not only for an abstention from further taxing himself in melding with Spock (and Amanda too) but also for his later illness, which gradually caused his emotional and telepathic control to erode, and eventually killed him.

Do we want to see another Kirk origin story? Kirk at the academy with Finnegan etc.? Or do we want to see the circumstances that led the Coridan planets to consider federation membership that would ultimately lead to the Babel conference? (For me, it’s no to the former, but yes to the latter)
I'm pretty much with you there. No interest whatsoever in turning DSC into a "Kirk origin story" here. (He should already have been out of the Academy for a few years now anyway, in this timeline. This is around the time he was a Lieutenant on the Farragut per "Obsession" [TOS]. He seems to have returned there as an instructor at some point before getting his first command, per "Where No Man Has Gone Before" [TOS], though.) There are plenty of possibilities for making a peripheral reference or two, but it wouldn't bother me at all if they forwent even that. Same with McCoy and whoever else. Better to keep on doing their own world-building and explore closer connections only as they become directly relevant, as obviously those between Burnham and Spock/Sarek/Amanda have been.

Speaking of which, I certainly hope their use of Pike and Spock won't take focus away from Burnham and the other characters, especially those who really need to be developed further, like Detmer and Owokesun. (Not making greater use of them than they have is probably one of my own biggest criticisms thus far, but I'm sure things will balance themselves out, given time.) I have a feeling they'll be fairly mindful and careful of that themselves, though, so I'm not worried.

As to the Coridan thing, I'm rather indifferent to that one specifically, but I definitely wouldn't mind it, or other stuff in that vein, to be sure. Personally, I don't really have any particular desire for it to be a more direct prequel than it already has been, or feel that to be lacking. Still, I do imagine they'll continue to play both sides of that field. I'm content to go along for the ride, and just enjoy seeing where it leads! Glad you're willing to come along too, at least for the time being!
:beer:

That’s true I guess - the Gorn skeleton hinting at Lorca’s mirror universeness is evidence of that.
Yep. Another example is Burnham's record being expunged, so as to match up with Spock's statement to Chekov in "The Tholian Web" (TOS) that there is "no record" of a mutiny aboard a starship. Also, knowledge of the MU being classified. And defeating the cloak.

-MMoM:D
 
Last edited:
Of course neither of those things are happening. TOS is the same as it's always been...

TOS is the same for those of us who were here before Discovery. For people late to the party, it changes how the Spock character is viewed. I guess whether or not TOS is changed comes down to how important one sees author intent and how it relates to the shows.

Essentially, a mileage may vary scenario.
 
I remember when Smallville was in its run that some fans called it a "preboot", which was a portmanteau of prequel and reboot... a hybrid. The show was its own thing in many ways, but also incorporated many elements of other versions of Superman, mostly the Christopher Reeves films.

I've kind of begun to think of Disco as being the same, a preboot. It has prequel elements, but it's doing its own thing too. I still think they would do themselves a favor by retroactively establishing Disco as being in an alternate timeline just to get the diehards off their back, but I personally don't need this.

DIS is a preboot. Also it's an inbetween-quel (between ENT and TOS). With Spock now a retell-boot-quel.

Really, I think the lack of a distinct identity is one of the main problems of this show. It disregards so much of the original canon, and at the same time it's plots are super dependand on the continuity of said canon. It really comes across as somebody not knowing what they want to do. It's a bit of the same problem that ST09 had, that it couldn't decide wether it was an alternate part of the old universe, or a complete reboot. That shit should be thought out before the show starts. Now they have to retcon their own stuff if they want to fit in with the rest of Trek. That's not going to work out how they imagined.
 
I'm very happy I could help you enjoy it more, even if only a little! At times I've felt myself to be well and truly wasting my time even attempting to battle the tide negativity that frequently encroaches here. (Not to suggest that's unique to this board by any means, nor that there aren't just as many perfectly valid criticisms to be offered up with respect to DSC as there are of any previous Trek series. I don't mean to smear anyone with too broad a brush, even if I may unfortunately come off that way on some days!) But your comments, among others, make me feel it is at least somewhat worthwhile.:)
Glad my comments have that effect :) as a recently-locked thread has shown, there’s so much potential for negativity (and I’ve been guilty of that myself to my shame) but I try to stay on the side of positivity and open mindedness as best I can :)

That's why I said "I, Mudd" (TOS) instead of "Mudd's Women" (TOS). "Magic To Make..." directly sets up his relationship with Stella as depicted there.;)
That’s true you did, sorry :lol: the inclusion of Stella does set up the events of I Mudd - I’d actually like to see how Harry became more rougeish and how Stella became more of a battle axe if they wanted to do a more overt prequel!

Apologies for the essay here...
No need :) you know your onions when it comes to TOS and I like your interpretations - I should get better acquainted with TOS - a rewatch is in order I think!

When we watch "Journey To Babel" (TOS) now, we are granted a deeper and better understanding of why Sarek was so upset with Spock over his choice to join Starfleet. It was never quite so simple as what Amanda suggests (in her own incomplete understanding as something of an outsider, despite having long lived among Vulcans), i.e. that Sarek merely wanted his son to follow traditional Vulcan beliefs as handed down through the generations. It's a lot more complex than that, as pretty much everything else we saw portrayed of Sarek up to now, both there and elsewhere, already suggested.
True. This element was one of the things I liked about that episode. Ok, it foregrounded Michael, but it had to do that in the context of the story. Sarek’s reaction to starfleet is interesting when we consider your next point though:

DSC further reinforces for us that Sarek, quite in contrast to most Vulcans, finds the embracing of humans—in all senses—to be eminently logical and desirable. He is something of a maverick in that regard
It would have seemed more logical for Sarek to encourage Spock to join starfleet - until you know what happened in “Lethe” of course...

Such prejudices die hard, and all the more so in cultures that steadfastly refuse to acknowledge and openly address them.
Which is an odd trait of Vulcans - prejudice is illogical (doesn’t Saavik make this point?)

Despite never intending to, Sarek drove all his children away from him,
Now that point has me interested in seeing what happened with Sybok. I didn’t really care about him up to now (I treat Star Trek V as an extended dream sequence) but in the context of this point, it’d be very interesting to see how Sarek drove Sybok away - a point the latter may well have yelled at his father...

but also for his later illness, which gradually caused his emotional and telepathic control to erode, and eventually killed him.
Wow - imagine the emotional impact of Michael (inadvertently) causing Sarek’s predisposition to Bandaii syndrome - he could have a doctor inform him of this at some point. Even Sarek may struggle to contain his emotions at that news... and it would give more depth to the events we see in TNG

Better to keep on doing their own world-building and explore closer connections only as they become directly relevant, as obviously those between Burnham and Spock/Sarek/Amanda have been.
Totally agree with this :)

As to the Coridan thing, I'm rather indifferent to that one specifically, but I definitely wouldn't mind it, or other stuff in that vein, to be sure. Personally, I don't really have any particular desire for it to be a more direct prequel than it already has been, or feel that to be lacking. Still, I do imagine they'll continue to play both sides of that field. I'm content to go along for the ride, and just enjoy seeing where it leads! Glad you're willing to come along too, at least for the time being!
Also agreed - it didn’t have to be Coridan specifically, but something like that. I’d like to see more development of the Klingon Cold War actually - I like Star Trek when it does politics.

Yep. Another example is Burnham's record being expunged, so as to match up with Spock's statement to Chekov in "The Tholian Web" (TOS) that there is "no record" of a mutiny aboard a starship. Also, knowledge of the MU being classified. And defeating the cloak.
This is the only bugbear I have with all this - the “classified”, record expunged thing seemed like a cop out to me (I’m too harsh on DSC!). I’d have preferred they didn’t go near those topics at all, but ENT introduced cloaks etc so the door was opened long before DSC turned up :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top