Are there any good Star Trek books set in TOS movie era? Always felt like it was an untapped era that I’d love to see more stories in.
Greg Cox wrote a couple of books set between The Final Frontier and The Undiscovered Country, the e-book novella, Miasma, and the full length novel Foul Deeds Will Rise. Dayton Ward's In the Name of Honor also takes place during the same era.
Shadows on the Sun by Micheal Jan Friedman and Sarek by A.C Crispin both take place after TUC. I'm not sure if it's before or after the Generations prolouge, but Cast No Shadow by James Swallow is also some time after TUC. There's also Excelsior: Forged in Fire by Micheal A. Martin and Andy Mangels, which covers the beginning of Sulu's command of the Excelsior.
If you consider after the Generations prologue movie era then there is also Vulcan's Forge and Vulcan's Heart by Josepha Sherman and Susan Shwartz, and the Lost Era series. There are more movie era stories, but those are the ones I know for sure are movie era.
I think Captain's Daughter is set across the movie era, as well as before and after.
A bunch of LA Graf books are TMP era, I've been told; Shell Game, Ice Trap, Death Count. The Kobayashi Maru framing story is post-TMP.
The Rihannsu series (a bit older and somewhat non-canon but a really good Romulan perspective)
I'd love to see more books between TFF and TUC because that seems to be a great untapped period of Star Trek history to me
The New Earth series is one I read about a year or so ago.... The period it takes place in was revised a bit from what is noted in the series originally (it was revised to take place later in the 2270s--I want to say 2278 from maybe 2272).
I'm not sure if "revised" is the right word. My recollection is that the historian's note at the front claimed it was "shortly after TMP" even though the rest of the text made it clear that it was closer to TWOK, with Kirk as an admiral, Spock as a captain, and Chekov leaving for Reliant. So the Timeliners' choice to put it in 2278 was basically just a matter of ignoring the historian's note that didn't make sense in the first place, rather than changing anything in the text proper.
I'm not sure if "revised" is the right word. My recollection is that the historian's note at the front claimed it was "shortly after TMP" even though the rest of the text made it clear that it was closer to TWOK, with Kirk as an admiral, Spock as a captain, and Chekov leaving for Reliant. So the Timeliners' choice to put it in 2278 was basically just a matter of ignoring the historian's note that didn't make sense in the first place, rather than changing anything in the text proper.
I wonder what the author was thinking when they worked out the math on that.
Was it really the author, though? As I said, my impression is that the only thing that suggests a 2272 setting is the historian's note at the beginning, which seems to contradict the actual body of the novel. So I tend to assume that note was added by the editor or something. Is there anything in the actual text of the story, discounting the historian's note, that specifies the year?
The only thing I came across so far is in the middle of chapter 10 (page 173) where Kirk and Kilvennan are having an argument and it jumps back to right before the Belle Terre expedition started with a flashback listed as: "The Captain's Meeting / October 31, 2272".
It is a flashback mainly setting up the change in uniforms, but it is not some far off jump in time since Kirk is addressing the expedition staff and privateers. I'm only a few chapters deeper.
I've seen most timelines place it in 2278/79 which makes more sense to me, and I don't dispute it. I was just a little thrown off when I saw this flashback.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.