i'd watch this. i mean, as long as president picard isn't embroiled in a scandal in which he's accused of colluding with the romulans in order to take office.Articles of the Federation with President Jean Luc Picard
i'd watch this. i mean, as long as president picard isn't embroiled in a scandal in which he's accused of colluding with the romulans in order to take office.
If Picard finds another Iconian portal and is now at a point in his life where he thinks “hang the temporal prime directive” then we could see a fun adventure archaeology show.This archaeologist doesn't think archaeology is boring. ;-)
Or Lara Croft for that matter.Tell that to Indiana Jones.
And everything might be changed by one incredible alien artifact in the pilot...Yes, that's my point. Trek has historically done "prehistory" badly. I'm not a Star Wars fan in general, but the expanded universe there has generally done a much better job showcasing the immense history of galactic civilization, much of which has been lost to the mists of time and legend. In contrast, Trek makes it seem like space was a big empty nothing with some hyper-evolved energy beings wandering about until all of the races we know and love sprung from their homeworlds roughly concurrently.
If Picard finds another Iconian portal and is now at a point in his life where he thinks “hang the temporal prime directive” then we could see a fun adventure archaeology show.
Then again I was a big fan of the UK show “time team” when that was on and that was all about archaeology.
So who knows - maybe it’ll be as much about archaeology as DSC was about the Klingon war?
Sounds like it might be a long term series and not a limited one based on comments from CBS All Access.
Stewart said something about "a few years" in reference to where the Picard character might go, so it sure sounds like he wants it to last more than just a single year. So he should keep the gym membership and the kale smoothies.
Tell that to Indiana Jones.
Because he is not your only actor. CGI is cheaper than live action, look at the Clone Wars series. You also have sets to worry about, which aren't an issue in CGI. Even Star Trek took the animated route after TOS.Why on earth would they do a CGI when Stewart looks virtually identical to what he did 15 years ago? And why would he do voice work instead, considering his voice is the thing which has changed the most in that time. Not making sense, dude.
Because he is not your only actor. CGI is cheaper than live action, look at the Clone Wars series. You also have sets to worry about, which aren't an issue in CGI. Even Star Trek took the animated route after TOS.
Studio heads and movie execs pretty much think the opposite of what you suggest above. They almost never watch a show flop and then say, "lets do something else similar". They only do "similar" shows when the first one (or first in a long time), is a hit. So, more Trek on TV is directly related to DSC's success.Does it, though? I was wondering whether CBS was looking at DSC thinking “this isn’t going as well as we’d hoped. What else do we have in our arsenal?
ah, that makes more sense, thank you!CBS probably saw a pretty significant cancellation of subscriptions to CBSAA after DSC ended. That directly affects revenue. More Trek would likely soften the mass exodus after the next DSC season finale.
Yes, that's my point. Trek has historically done "prehistory" badly. I'm not a Star Wars fan in general, but the expanded universe there has generally done a much better job showcasing the immense history of galactic civilization, much of which has been lost to the mists of time and legend. In contrast, Trek makes it seem like space was a big empty nothing with some hyper-evolved energy beings wandering about until all of the races we know and love sprung from their homeworlds roughly concurrently.
So who knows - maybe it’ll be as much about archaeology as DSC was about the Klingon war?
Zinnnnnnngggg!So little to not at all?![]()
Hmmm.....I know that in Star Trek, you had lot's of ancient races mentioned, some evolved, some destroyed themselves, some were killed off by their androids, etc. So it's not quite as you describe, imo, for the original series. Can't speak much for the 24th century shows since I don't recall too much of what they established in that regard.
Yep. TOS was positively littered with lost and extinct civilizations leaving dangerous artifacts or computer-gods behind, or whose descendants had lost since forgotten their former technology or whatever.
Yep. TOS was positively littered with lost and extinct civilizations leaving dangerous artifacts or computer-gods behind, or whose descendants had lost since forgotten their former technology or whatever.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.