I doubt it was particularly original. It may well have been a new concept for the majority of the viewing audience but it was a well used trope in science fiction stories well before this. But those were very much a niche audience. Gene Roddenberry understood that and he pillaged a lot of ideas from science fiction stories and presented them to a mass audience for the first time.Very good episode this one, and very original for the time as well; having to let something bad happen in order for good to prevail.
How could they?...Of course taking her to the future was another option but also an unethical one..
Interesting notion! So if Scott and Uhura went through after and fixed it, they might have been able to get back but not Kirk and Spock ;-pHow?
There's no indication they can get back unless they fix the timeline.Make sure we arrive before McCoy gotKIRK
there. It's vital we stop him before he does
whatever it was that changed all history.
Guardian, if we are successful...
Then you will be returned. It will be asGUARDIAN
though none of you had gone.
No but Mirror Mirror has a bigger landing party and the presence of scenes involving them didn't detract from the overall story.That's not what the story is about.
How could they?
There's no indication they can get back unless they fix the timeline.Make sure we arrive before McCoy gotKIRK
there. It's vital we stop him before he does
whatever it was that changed all history.
Guardian, if we are successful...
Then you will be returned. It will be asGUARDIAN
though none of you had gone.
More to the point, there's no indication the Guardian would have allowed anyone to come back to the present who had not originally gone through it.
My approach is that there is no indication that it wouldn't, either. Thus another shameless plug for my story in the fanfic section. (It would be nice to get some feedback on that, even if it is of the negative variety.)
In any case, when something is left pretty much open-ended and not definitively stated to one side or the other, I feel that people are free to explore their own interpretations.
It makes it more dramatic to think they would have been stuck back in the 30s if they failed though.
Weirdly, Starfleet signs off on further historical exploration despite very clear evidence that it's a disaster waiting to happen.
You know, when it comes right down to the shizznits, all that stuff about "All is as it was before" is quite a conceit. It could only be as it was before if none of them had been there at all. I think Spock was realizing that the Guardian was a narcissistic asshole. Kirk, too. If necessary, I think he would have shorted-out the bastard, just like Nomad.
Weirdly, Starfleet signs off on further historical exploration despite very clear evidence that it's a disaster waiting to happen.
The exact details of how Kirk, Spock and McCoy return after Edith is killed are unknown to us. Was it immediately after? Did they go back to their room to change into their uniforms, or did the Guardian take care of all that?
They couldn't leave them behind. They're high tech.I think it would be reasonable to infer that they changed back into their clothes themselves, but it's not an absolute because it wasn't shown.
Which in itself is still pioneering. The dude who invented the 1st catamaran probably hadn't envisioned it being used to settle the islands of the pacific, but some other folks came along & were like "I bet we could" lolI doubt it was particularly original. It may well have been a new concept for the majority of the viewing audience but it was a well used trope in science fiction stories well before this. But those were very much a niche audience. Gene Roddenberry understood that and he pillaged a lot of ideas from science fiction stories and presented them to a mass audience for the first time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.