• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

James Duff joins Discovery Season 2 as co-showrunner.

Executive producer, Kurtzman's old job. I don't think it's quiet the same thing as co-showrunners. Previous two were peers/co-showrunners. Kurzman and this guy are not peers.
 
The new people look at least like they're more experienced than the writing staff the producers fielded in the first season. This cannot be a bad thing.
 
Executive producer, Kurtzman's old job. I don't think it's quiet the same thing as co-showrunners. Previous two were peers/co-showrunners. Kurzman and this guy are not peers.

Just for clarification, I chose the co-showrunner thread title due to a quote in the article which states that Duff would "help Kurtzman run the writers room." But I believe you're right in that this won't work the same as the previous showrunners.

EDIT: After years of lurking, I finally hit 15 posts and can have an avatar!
 
Last edited:
What I am hearing is that I should check back in on the show somewhere around mid-season two?
No, because the season is probably already written. All this would do is change any direction currently being filmed.
 
No, because the season is probably already written. All this would do is change anything currently being filmed.

I doubt they would've made a big deal about Harberts and Berg if everything was already written. They could've saved bad press by simply saying they departed since their duties on season two were complete, they chose to chase other opportunities.
 
I doubt they would've made a big deal about Harberts and Berg if everything was already written. They could've saved bad press by simply saying they departed since their duties on season two were complete, they chose to chase other opportunities.

Nah
 
No, because the season is probably already written. All this would do is change any direction currently being filmed.
The Expanse showed they can reboot or "soft reboot" a series in one episode. If Kurzman wants to change things quickly, he most definitely has the power. If CBS was planning to split the season into two chapters again, that would be his opportunity.
 
I was going to say mid-season seems like an odd place to shake things up, especially in a season that won't be aired in two different parts, but then I remembered that's what DS9 Season 5 did. So I'm not going to say it.

What I will say is: I don't think they'll do that in DSC Season 2 unless that's where the story was leading. Otherwise, a showrunner would only want to shake things up if they were the one who saw something wrong with the way the show was going overall.
 
Executive producer, Kurtzman's old job.

Huh? The first season had 9 different people credited as executive producers at various times, ranging from creators and showrunners to the director of the pilot to a couple of people who are basically just financial partners. "Executive producer" is a title that covers a multitude of different roles in a production, from creative to logistical to business.

Kurtzman's role on season 1 was basically the equivalent of Greg Berlanti's role on the Arrowverse shows or Riverdale, or Joss Whedon's role on Agents of SHIELD -- he and his partner Heather Kadin (also an executive producer, but on the logistics/business side rather than the writing side) are the heads of the production company that makes this and various other shows. In Trek terms, Kurtzman and Kadin were basically in the Herb Solow/Rick Berman role, the people who hire and oversee the showrunners. When showrunners Berg & Harberts were let go, Kurtzman essentially stepped into what had been his subordinates' role to fill the gap -- much like when Berlanti moved back into a more hands-on showrunner role on Supergirl and The Flash once Andrew Kreisberg was dismissed. It sounds like Duff will be his co-showrunner, perhaps, or something close to it.

Note that Olatunde Osunsanmi is also getting upped to executive producer, but in a totally different role. It sounds like he's in the "producing director" role that's becoming increasingly common, a director who stays on with a show permanently and oversees the logistics of its shooting, and coordinates with individual episode directors to maintain a consistent tone.
 
The Expanse showed they can reboot or "soft reboot" a series in one episode.
It did? What are you thinking of? I thought it was first and foremost an adaptation of a book series... is there some behind-the-scenes creative shift I've been unaware of?...

This puzzles me on two fronts. First of all, OO directed that one but according to the credits he had nothing to do with writing it; that was all Ted Sullivan. Second, seriously, that was one of your favorite episodes? The one that was all about character assassination of both Lorca and Burnham, wildly unmotivated plot developments, and exceedingly stupid fight scenes? That's the one that made me think the show had jumped the shark.
 
I doubt they would've made a big deal about Harberts and Berg if everything was already written. They could've saved bad press by simply saying they departed since their duties on season two were complete, they chose to chase other opportunities.

No, they had to proactively address that staff and writers allege verbal abuse and a hostile work environment. They would in no way benefit from hiding this, and if it ever came out, it would reflect really badly on CBS, particularly if Harberts and Berg went onto another show and treated people similarly.
 
It did? What are you thinking of? I thought it was first and foremost an adaptation of a book series... is there some behind-the-scenes creative shift I've been unaware of?...

I don't think ITDUDE meant "reboot" in the sense of altering the continuity, just in the sense of ending one story arc and starting a different one midseason, which The Expanse did in both its second and third seasons. The break between the stories of the first and second novels took place midway through season 2, and the break between the second and third novels fell midway through season 3, with a time jump between one episode and the next.
 
That's certainly what this show needs: even more producers. [/sarcasm]

Discovery has lost several producers already -- Bryan Fuller was let go early on, Joe Menosky left midseason, Akiva Goldsman didn't come back for season 2, and now Gretchen Berg & Aaron Harberts were fired. Naturally they're bringing in new people or promoting from within to take over the departed people's jobs, just like every other show does.
 
I don't think ITDUDE meant "reboot" in the sense of altering the continuity, just in the sense of ending one story arc and starting a different one midseason, which The Expanse did in both its second and third seasons. The break between the stories of the first and second novels took place midway through season 2, and the break between the second and third novels fell midway through season 3, with a time jump between one episode and the next.
Reboot is quickly becoming a meaningless term.
 
Reboot is quickly becoming a meaningless term.

It's never really had a consistent meaning to begin with -- after all, it's entertainment slang derived metaphorically from a computing term that's itself a metaphor based on a slang expression for doing something physically impossible (pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps). Originally, in industry usage, "reboot" meant any revival of a dormant media property, starting something up again after it had lain fallow for a time. I believe that the term came to be more broadly popularized by the Battlestar Galactica remake in 2004ff, and since that particular "reboot" was a complete reinvention of the premise with no continuity with the original, laypeople got the mistaken impression that the term applied exclusively to a continuity reinvention, and that's the meaning that subsequently came to dominate in fan vernacular, even though it was never a formally defined or strict usage. It's always had a range of uses as a metaphor, but fans tend to be oddly prescriptivist about their slang and what it should or shouldn't be used for.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top