Kirk's Enterprise is named in his ships honour, so yeah he did.
There is no pre-Enterprise evidence for that. Plus, based on TMP the XCV-330 was the predecessor to the NCC-1701.
Kirk's Enterprise is named in his ships honour, so yeah he did.
Do you enjoy living in your world of falsehoods?There is no pre-Enterprise evidence for that. Plus, based on TMP the XCV-330 was the predecessor to the NCC-1701.
Do you enjoy living in your world of falsehoods?
Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
I'd say the second is more of an assumption, considering that it wasn't outright stated. Admittedly a very reasonable assumption, but still an assumption.2. Based on TMP the XCV-330 was the predecessor to the NCC-1701.
This is also factually correct becasue of the footage seen in TMP and the fact that the Enterprise series was still several decades away.
So it's hardly a world of falsehoods to claim the above statements to be true.
I'd say the second is more of an assumption, considering that it wasn't outright stated. Admittedly a very reasonable assumption, but still an assumption.
There is no pre-Enterprise evidence for that.
There is no pre-Enterprise evidence for that. Plus, based on TMP the XCV-330 was the predecessor to the NCC-1701.
And based on the 602 Club in Enterprise, the Ringship predates the NX-01 by some time so no.
I'd mentioned this one too many times. Archer and his crew had one last mission and whatever happened in the end or beginning of it - they were wiped out of existence of the real universe but somehow created the JJverse. Into Darkness showcases the NX-01 in an Admiral's office.Ok if this topic has come up before I apologise, but any fun reasons why Archer is never mentioned in Star Trek history (ignore the real life reason) and add to the post above you!
Cheers
1. His existence was wiped out by another temporal cold war, on the night of his original conception, dad Henry Archer got drunk and no nookie took place.
He saved Earth and the timeline, both of which in Trek are the same thing.Archer never saved the galaxy.
Pretty sure that one didn't make it to the screen. Hoshi does say "He had two planets named after him!" though.Actually, yes it was. Archer's personnel file (shown onscreen in IAMD II) specifically states that the planet in "Strange New World" was named Archer IV in his honor.
I see the Franklin being a JJVerse only thing, since there were only the two warp 5 engine projects in the Prime timeline. The failed Daedalus one and Henry Archer’s.Now, why didn't the historic warp 5 crew ever mention the historic warp 4 ship Franklin?
No thank you.Read the novels
Its meant to be a fun, 'take the mick' thread, not a serious inuniverse analysis of what happened.....sighHow often in your everyday life do you mention John Paul Jones or Captain James Cook? People don't constantly go around talking about historical figures, unless they're historians. So this doesn't even need to be a question.
Thank you!!!!!!Okay, I got a feeling that this thread wasn't created to seriously discuss why Archer wasn't mentioned but rather to post fun reasons for that, so:
When becoming Federation president Archer went a bit off the deep end, started insulting Vulcans on the holonet and got fired quickly. The young Federation decided to purge all records of his presidency, like the 8.5th President from Gravity Falls, hence why he isn't referenced.
That we are told about. Archer is a nepotostic toady. He got the job because his dad was head of the Warp 5 complex. He wasn't giving any press to Franklinn (which is Prime timeline, Pegg's thoughts on the matter nonwithstanding)I see the Franklin being a JJVerse only thing, since there were only the two warp 5 engine projects in the Prime timeline. The failed Daedalus one and Henry Archer’s.
True. I should have said, "A predecessor".
But of course the real explanation is just that Archer hadn't been created yet.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.