• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Supergirl - Season 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
These secondary characters. They seem to be named with lesser authority. Super 'Girl'. As ^ you point out Wonder 'Boy'. Even with two males Batman and the 'Boy' Wonder. It is how they were framed.
 
I'm tempted to bristle at this (perhaps your intent), but again, being fair, there's more to the dynamic here than just that Superman's a man and Supergirl's a woman. As a character, Sg is derived from Sm, and so is to some extent always secondary in that historical sense (just as a conjectural "Wonder Boy" spinoff character would always be secondary to Wonder Woman). Also, Superman is not just any superhero, he is in a very real sense THE superhero, the very first and the template from which all others sprang, male or female, direct derivations or not. So there are plausibly other factors at work besides pure sexism in giving Superman a special primacy.

None of those factors really apply in universe though, neither character is aware what they do or do not signify as real world cultural icons, they just act as they are written or as their circumstances dictate, depending on how you look at it.

I changed my post from the being there 'first' after trying to pinpoint who was actually older versus who appears older and who captured public attention first. It's debatable apparently.

I see this consideration of being made redundant factoring big time with the next Avengers but that is another topic :)

That makes more sense, but I'm doubting very much the problem you expect with Avengers will really materialise. Unlike SM, CM is not typically written as being the deus ex machina or the truly unstoppable force. She is powerful, but not to the point of seeming like a god.
 
None of those factors really apply in universe though, neither character is aware what they do or do not signify as real world cultural icons, they just act as they are written or as their circumstances dictate, depending on how you look at it.
Totally true. I was just musing on the fact that "Aha! Sexism!" might not be the only consideration affecting people's perception of their relationship as fictional characters (though I have no doubt it's a key factor for a lot of folks).
 
I think Superman knows very well he is a cultural icon - in universe.

Which is beside the point. We are talking about the perspective real world observers have on him, the cultural impact he has here. Short of breaking the fourth wall, which he isn't in the habit of, he can only act according to the whims of writers and the prevailing situation. He won't be motivated by the primacy of his publications or implied sexism on the part of the viewer unless those writers are themselves.

If those writers are genuinely giving Supergirl a fair portrayal they should no more make him a vital component of her adventures than they should do make her a vital part of his, not unless there is a genuine reason to do so.

Yes we can ask "where's Superman?" at this point, but that misses the point we never ask the same question in reverse and there's no viable in universe analogue to that perceptual bias. They are, essentially, equals and any argument one needs the other is by definition bidirectional.
 
Which is beside the point. We are talking about the perspective real world observers have on him, the cultural impact he has here. Short of breaking the fourth wall, which he isn't in the habit of, he can only act according to the whims of writers and the prevailing situation. He won't be motivated by the primacy of his publications or implied sexism on the part of the viewer unless those writers are themselves.

If those writers are genuinely giving Supergirl a fair portrayal they should no more make him a vital component of her adventures than they should do make her a vital part of his, not unless there is a genuine reason to do so.

Yes we can ask "where's Superman?" at this point, but that misses the point we never ask the same question in reverse and there's no viable in universe analogue to that perceptual bias. They are, essentially, equals and any argument one needs the other is by definition bidirectional.
Um it was a point you initiated. I just corrected it.
 
You would think they would want to use Superman more because even though the show is part of the same Arrowverse it's also a show in it's own world which means you don't have as many crossover stuff as you do with the other shows. Other than the epic series crossover events, the universe of "Supergirl" seems very small compared to other shows and Superman as far as we know represents the only other Superhero working on this world. Right now he represents you most easy to go to crossover, even though he doesn't even have a show his name alone creates interest. You should see Superman show up more or be mentioned in the same way you see Oliver and The Flash meet up from time to time. That or they really need to start expanding the world some. Maybe when "Black Lighting" finally admits it's part of the universe you can have some more fun between those shows by having that show be part of the "Supergirl" world as opposed to the world of the other shows. Then use Superman some more and maybe establish that other hero's are forming in the world would be nice.

Jason
 
You would think they would want to use Superman more because even though the show is part of the same Arrowverse it's also a show in it's own world which means you don't have as many crossover stuff as you do with the other shows.

It's not just a question of whether they want to, it's a question of whether Tyler Hoechlin is available. And maybe DC/Warner Bros. wouldn't let them use Superman this year because of the Justice League movie.
 
It's not just a question of whether they want to, it's a quest of whether Tyler Hoechlin is available. And maybe DC/Warner Bros. wouldn't let them use Superman this year because of the Justice League movie.[/QUOTE}

I have also wondered about that as well. Even name dropping him might be a no-no at this point. One rumor I hear is we might get Lex Luthor next year which would be big and I wonder how the ole Superman issue would factor into that. I also think it would be cool if they could someday do a story where they visit Metroplolis. I also want to see a mirror Flash show up in that world. Or maybe Wally comes over to be the Flash on this earth since we know he won't be a regular on "Legends of TOmmorow."

Jason
 
I liked the "punch me with my forcefield on" gag better on Atlantis. And Rodney McKay is so much more punchable than Winn, though at least Demos didn't go for the face.
 
These secondary characters. They seem to be named with lesser authority. Super 'Girl'. As ^ you point out Wonder 'Boy'. Even with two males Batman and the 'Boy' Wonder. It is how they were framed.

Superboy was a 1/2 hour live action tv series that ran for four seasons, between 1988 and 1992.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

the titular character was recast between season one and two.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094559/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

John Newton was 24 when he started playing Clark Kent/Superboy.

Gerard Christopher was 30 when he started playing Clark Kent/Superboy.

:)

Season One is pretty bad.
 
I liked the "punch me with my forcefield on" gag better on Atlantis. And Rodney McKay is so much more punchable than Winn, though at least Demos didn't go for the face.

It brings up an interesting question: is Winn really supposed to be annoying? I get that he's the hot-shot tech genius, but I'm not getting the "wanting to punch for a long time" jerk vibe from the character.
 
Just wondering if anyone ever asks why supergirl is missing every time superman saves the world?

Comic fans have asked that question for decades about a great number of superheroes, which is the reason when a truly global--or in some cases galactic threat arrives (e.g. Crisis on Infinite Earths) it is not only completely sensible that such events would demand the presence of anyone known to deal with that kind of problem, but its expected. That's what was once exciting about comic crossovers (well, in the era when publishers were not cranking out event comics every other week). Superman is not even a semi-regular on this series, so when he shows up, it should make the overall episode(s) seem special, but hard sell the fact that its so grave a situation that everyone has to be involved.

And again, the Kryptonian factor would not go unnoticed by one of the last of their kind. Whether Superman was on screen or not, even a text or call to SM was necessary.
 
It brings up an interesting question: is Winn really supposed to be annoying? I get that he's the hot-shot tech genius, but I'm not getting the "wanting to punch for a long time" jerk vibe from the character.

I think that has more to do with Demos's personality than Winn's. He's always been kind of prickly. His first episode was "The Martian Chronicles," where he was the one who got all paranoid about who was a White Martian impostor and ended up drawing a gun on his colleagues, IIRC.
 
Superboy was a 1/2 hour live action tv series that ran for four seasons, between 1988 and 1992.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

the titular character was recast between season one and two.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094559/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

John Newton was 24 when he started playing Clark Kent/Superboy.

Gerard Christopher was 30 when he started playing Clark Kent/Superboy.

:)

Season One is pretty bad.
Four years isn't a bad run!
 
When Superboy was over, the 2nd Superboy actor auditioned for Lois and Clark The New Adventures of Superman.

Gerard Christopher got Dean Cain's part for about a minute and a half, until he reminded producers that he was Superboy, and they didn't like that, because the producers wanted their new series to be seen as ground breaking, and not a sequel to a laughing stock, they'd never heard of before.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top