I'm tempted to bristle at this (perhaps your intent), but again, being fair, there's more to the dynamic here than just that Superman's a man and Supergirl's a woman. As a character, Sg is derived from Sm, and so is to some extent always secondary in that historical sense (just as a conjectural "Wonder Boy" spinoff character would always be secondary to Wonder Woman). Also, Superman is not just any superhero, he is in a very real sense THE superhero, the very first and the template from which all others sprang, male or female, direct derivations or not. So there are plausibly other factors at work besides pure sexism in giving Superman a special primacy.
I changed my post from the being there 'first' after trying to pinpoint who was actually older versus who appears older and who captured public attention first. It's debatable apparently.
I see this consideration of being made redundant factoring big time with the next Avengers but that is another topic![]()
If Superman IS saving the world then superwoman, er girl, is redundant.
Logic.
Totally true. I was just musing on the fact that "Aha! Sexism!" might not be the only consideration affecting people's perception of their relationship as fictional characters (though I have no doubt it's a key factor for a lot of folks).None of those factors really apply in universe though, neither character is aware what they do or do not signify as real world cultural icons, they just act as they are written or as their circumstances dictate, depending on how you look at it.
I think Superman knows very well he is a cultural icon - in universe.
I think Superman knows very well he is a cultural icon - in universe.
Um it was a point you initiated. I just corrected it.Which is beside the point. We are talking about the perspective real world observers have on him, the cultural impact he has here. Short of breaking the fourth wall, which he isn't in the habit of, he can only act according to the whims of writers and the prevailing situation. He won't be motivated by the primacy of his publications or implied sexism on the part of the viewer unless those writers are themselves.
If those writers are genuinely giving Supergirl a fair portrayal they should no more make him a vital component of her adventures than they should do make her a vital part of his, not unless there is a genuine reason to do so.
Yes we can ask "where's Superman?" at this point, but that misses the point we never ask the same question in reverse and there's no viable in universe analogue to that perceptual bias. They are, essentially, equals and any argument one needs the other is by definition bidirectional.
Um it was a point you initiated. I just corrected it.
You would think they would want to use Superman more because even though the show is part of the same Arrowverse it's also a show in it's own world which means you don't have as many crossover stuff as you do with the other shows.
It's not just a question of whether they want to, it's a quest of whether Tyler Hoechlin is available. And maybe DC/Warner Bros. wouldn't let them use Superman this year because of the Justice League movie.[/QUOTE}
I have also wondered about that as well. Even name dropping him might be a no-no at this point. One rumor I hear is we might get Lex Luthor next year which would be big and I wonder how the ole Superman issue would factor into that. I also think it would be cool if they could someday do a story where they visit Metroplolis. I also want to see a mirror Flash show up in that world. Or maybe Wally comes over to be the Flash on this earth since we know he won't be a regular on "Legends of TOmmorow."
Jason
These secondary characters. They seem to be named with lesser authority. Super 'Girl'. As ^ you point out Wonder 'Boy'. Even with two males Batman and the 'Boy' Wonder. It is how they were framed.
I liked the "punch me with my forcefield on" gag better on Atlantis. And Rodney McKay is so much more punchable than Winn, though at least Demos didn't go for the face.
Just wondering if anyone ever asks why supergirl is missing every time superman saves the world?
It brings up an interesting question: is Winn really supposed to be annoying? I get that he's the hot-shot tech genius, but I'm not getting the "wanting to punch for a long time" jerk vibe from the character.
Four years isn't a bad run!Superboy was a 1/2 hour live action tv series that ran for four seasons, between 1988 and 1992.
the titular character was recast between season one and two.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094559/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
John Newton was 24 when he started playing Clark Kent/Superboy.
Gerard Christopher was 30 when he started playing Clark Kent/Superboy.
Season One is pretty bad.
It's all pretty bad. Gloriously bad. I don't know if I've ever had so much fun watching something so crummy in my life.Season One is pretty bad.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.