To be fair, that's not the line:
We truly are a bunch of petty nerds. At least we have that in common.
However, according to Wikipedia apparently somewhere a canon references it as a spice shipment, so I'll give you that one.
How magnanimous of you.
To be fair, that's not the line:
However, according to Wikipedia apparently somewhere a canon references it as a spice shipment, so I'll give you that one.
We are a bunch of petty nerds. At least we have that in common.

Well, what we know is that Han dumped it, so it's still an open question whether he intended to dump it all along. There's no proof that Han dumped it because he was afraid of being boarded; that's just what he told Jabba.
Well, we ARE nerds.
Look, I don't want to have a war with you, Ricky. I'm sorry if it came off that way. I'm really here to just discuss nerdy things. I get a little passionate about things when people attack things I love. It can come off a little harshly sometimes.
Hey no problems man I'm the same way. If we didn't love Star Wars we wouldn't be so passionate about it.
There's heroes on both sides.
The way Lucas originally described how Han & Chewie operate, it's mostly entrepreneurial. They're mostly smuggling relatively small high value items that aren't illegal so much as they have very high Imperial tariffs. Basically, black market goods and it could be anything from luxury goods to engine parts to basic food rations for worlds under embargo. It all depends on what goods he can acquire cheap in one place that are in high demand elsewhere and get them in around local and Imperial customs checks.
Regarding the Kessel run, it looks like Solo, with some good piloting and a good nav computer, managed to plot a better course through. Ok, that's fine, but that doesn't make the ship fast. It sounds like any ship with a good computer can do what the Falcon did. It wasn't speed. It was efficiency.
Yes. Lucas clearly ripped of Whedon.That sounds more like Malcolm Reynolds. Is there a difference?
At last I have seen it. I can sum it up in two sentences. Thanks Mr. Howard. You have done Ford, Dailey, and Crispin proud. I gave it an A+ because it is exactly what I think a Han Solo origin movie should be.
Well given that 'Firefly' was explicitly stated to have been conceived as "what if Han Solo and the Millennium Falcon had a TV show?!", probably not all that much.That sounds more like Malcolm Reynolds. Is there a difference?
And while poor Joss was only 12 years old no less. The nerve!Yes. Lucas clearly ripped of Whedon.

This should go without saying, but I'll say it anyway: these were just initial thoughts he had immediately after finishing the movie and certain notions may have changed in his mind over the next 40 years. So don't take any deviation from the above as a departure from Lucas's artistic vision or anything.
With Marvel we have one consistent timeline with each movie taking place one after the next.

See, that's the thing. That's why I'm not holding my breath for it to ever be established, at least on screen, that Han had anything to do with drugs, whether running them, using them, or anything.They probably didn't have him smuggle drugs in Solo to make it a bit more family friendly.
See, that's the thing. That's why I'm not holding my breath for it to ever be established, at least on screen, that Han had anything to do with drugs, whether running them, using them, or anything.
Wasn't that the main reason he got nerfed in the Greedo encounter in the first place?
I believe spice was a slang for narcotics in the Star Wars universe . . . unless Lucasfilm and Disney decide to change it.
![]()
True, but there are levels of family friendliness.Well, Solo showed an encounter between Han and a certain former bartender from Cheers that kinda reversed any idea that he is now family friendly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.