Four!
Yep, four. Mercury, Oldsmobile, Plymouth & Pontiac. A shame about Pontiac, GM needs a namplate for sportier cars. I had the 2005 GTO....lots of fun.
Four!
Yep, four. Mercury, Oldsmobile, Plymouth & Pontiac. A shame about Pontiac, GM needs a namplate for sportier cars. I had the 2005 GTO....lots of fun.
There has always been a general sameness to most automotive design no matter what the era. Only those knowledgable with a sharp eye can tell models apart. Today we look back with nostalgia to examples of noteworthy styling and design from the oast, but in their heyday they were usually not that much different from most everthing else.
A ‘57 Chevy Coupe can be considered an example of the epitome of 1950’s era styling, but who at the time could have predicted it would become a classic icon? Same with 60’s era muscle-cars.
A big difference between then and now is the rise of aerodynamic considerations and drag coefficient, the wind tunnel and the use of computers in design. Back in the day it was all hand drawing and the slide rule.
The ‘70s and ‘80s were generally a crapfest in automotive design. American cars got disgustingly bloated and their response to the rising cost of gas and the rising popularity of imports was half-hearted garbage. It took the Big 3 twenty years to become respectable again.
While I can appreciate some of the benefits of today’s technology there are things that really bug me. Sorry, but I hate the idea of trying to manipulate a tablet like interface just to listen to music or adjust the clinate controls. I am also leary of driver assist technology such as lane keeping and blind spot monitoring. If you are that inattentive that you need these things then maube you shoukfn’t be driving at all. Indeed an autonomous car would be ideal for you.
And on that note: http://driving.ca/auto-news/news/motor-mouth-the-social-contract-of-driving
I have some bad news for Ford, GM and Fiatsler - I don't want an SUV, Truck or Cross-over! I also don't care for a seriously expensive Corvette or a hopelessly impractical Camaro/Mustang/Challenger.
What I had (until Harvey ate it) was a Pontiac G8 GT sedan and I loved that car. Good looker, great handler, comfortable and could carry an impressive load of baggage/cargo in a well designed trunk. Don't even bother mentioning the nice, strong 6 liter V-8 and six-speed tranny...
No, the fuel economy wasn't stunning but, I was getting around 18 mpg in Houston traffic and got well into the mid 20's out in the country so..?
Yep - the G8 and GTO (last gen) were from "The Land Down Under" (deliberately played that classic Men At Work album after I bought it).
There are still a fair number of the GTOs around but, they stop bringing those over in 2006 so - they've had longer to be either worn out or wrapped around a telephone pole or just plain wrecked.
With the 400HP (400 #'s of torque) LS2 wearing out diffs, they would need custom jobs now. That might be the reason they de-powered the engine for the G8. And yeah, easy to wreck if they got away from you. I had a lot of fun with mine (also a 6 speed).
Actually, the G8 GT was not "de-powered". The engine was the L76 insteead of the LS6. It had DOD and that reduced the horsepower/torque a fair bit but, gave better fuel economy than the GTO, let alone the G8 GXP with it's 6.2 liter mill...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.