• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starships underwater?

Hey, that's a darn good hiding place - the center of the Earth; dinosaurs, half naked ladies, lush plant life, etc.

Sing along!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

(youtube.com/watch?v=rDzxGU6rxxg)
 
The beaming to Qo'noS was done via the super transwarp beaming doohickey that Starfleet had confiscated from Scotty. Apparently it's not standard shipboard equipment.

Kor
 
Yeah, that was a separate complaint I and others have had. But I don't want to turn this into a J.J. Rebootrams complaint thread.
 
While not "underwater" per se, Voyager encountered and traversed fluidic space in a number of episodes.
Can't recall exactly but I wonder if the Enterprise D or (DS9) Defiant ever immersed itself in a fluid mass, as it sounds familiar somehow.

To operate a starship inside a liquid mass... it certainly seems like a reasonably useful design feature, because: space exploration.
 
From a purely technical standpoint, yes it is possible to submerge a starship.

From a storytelling perspective, there's no damned reason to do so, most of the time. The one exception I'll entertain is Voyager's space ocean.
 
It was established that transporters weren't working because of the powerful magnetic fields in that region of the planet.

Kor

Don't remember them saying any such thing, in fact I'm pretty sure they didn't sense they used the transporter to beam Spock back to the ship before they left.
Are you remembering something I don't?
 
Starships: They can go faster than light, fly through black holes and take direct hits from antimatter weapons, but a little H20?:eek:
Don't remember them saying any such thing, in fact I'm pretty sure they didn't sense they used the transporter to beam Spock back to the ship before they left.
Are you remembering something I don't?
"Can we beam him up?"

"Not with these magnetic fields"

They needed line of sight to beam him up, hence lifting off and hovering above the volcano.
As we all know, there is nothing from Qo'noS to Earth that can hinder super karate monkey death J.J. transporters!
I'm guessing you haven't seen the finale of Discovery, yet.
They spore-jump the entire USS Discovery into a cave beneath the surface of Kronos.
 
Don't remember them saying any such thing, in fact I'm pretty sure they didn't sense they used the transporter to beam Spock back to the ship before they left.
Are you remembering something I don't?

"Do we have use of the transporters?"
"Negative, sir."
"Not with these magnetic fields."

The transporter wasn't usable until the volcano was "frozen." That's when they were finally able to beam Spock out.

Kor
 
It all just comes down to pressureand currents. Ships go through nebuli and gas giants which may contain material that has the same density as water. If the pressure is too much for the ship’s integrity field, the ship will be crushed.
 
JJ Trek 2009 answered that pretty well.
Agree.
startrekintodarkness222300134.jpg
 
"Do we have use of the transporters?"
"Negative, sir."
"Not with these magnetic fields."

The transporter wasn't usable until the volcano was "frozen." That's when they were finally able to beam Spock out.

Kor

Ok I remember that line now but the cold fusion device hadn't gone off yet when they beamed him up. The truth is the hole ship underwater thing was done so they had a cool scene at the beginning of the movie, did it make any sense not really and they didn't feel the need to tell us why the ship was underwater instead of them taking shuttles down from orbit.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top