• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

worst sci-fi TV series of post 1964

Yeah, I'm not sure it was "revisionism" that chased away the general audience. My big problem with ENT was that it was too much like the previous series. Despite lots of advance hype about it being newer and faster and sexier and rougher around the edges than the previous shows, it was pretty much the same old thing with slightly different window dressing and technobabble. It was well-produced and acted, but was about as fresh and exciting as reheated leftovers.

The average TV viewer doesn't care all that much about "canon." But they will change the channels if they feel like they're watching a xerox of a xerox of a xerox . . . . ..

Honestly, DISCO is the show I wanted ENT to be.
There have been many well written/well produced shows that never find/connect with an audience in sufficient numbers to keep them on the air. 'Quaility' doesn't always equal 'viable/successful in the entertainment market'. Just saying.
 
Not many people remember the series "UFO". I'm not referring to "Project UFO", but the British series known as Gerry Anderson's UFO . . . .
I remember a friend in school mentioning it, and it might have even been mentioned in Starlog, back when Anderson had a monthly column, but I never actually saw it. Saw and enoyed every episode of Project UFO, though. (Cue the ominous-sounding instrumental of the first couple bars of a well-known spiritual, then Jack Webb's voice-over: "Ezekiel saw the wheel. This is the wheel he said he saw.")
 
Not many people remember the series "UFO". I'm not referring to "Project UFO", but the British series known as Gerry Anderson's UFO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_(TV_series) . It has serious nostalgic value, but is also a seriously flawed series. The real killer of the series is when the main character Straker (the SHADO leader) allows his son to die because of a bogus reason related to fighting the aliens. After that, you can only hate the character, and the only thing left to appreciate is the beautiful women wearing sexy clothing in 1960s style.

To anyone who is a fan of the show and loves it, don't be offended. I do own the series on DVD and do find many interesting things about it.
One of the best opening sequences ever.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
There is some misunderstanding here.

I never, NEVER said that someone is stupid or intelligent for liking this or that show.

I quote myself:



But the title of the thread is clear: "worst sci-fi TV series of post 1964", not "TV series of post 1964 that you liked the least.". So it isn't about personal tastes, but about being objective, at least as much as possible when we talk about works of human creativity.
The tone of your posts has been pretty clear that you think there's something wrong with people who like the shows you've deemed inferior for whatever reason.

One person's masterpiece (aka "the best") may be another person's garbage (aka "the worst"). We all have different criteria by which we judge a show. Reviews don't impress me, and neither do awards. I make up my own mind.

Probably I would prefer to watch an episode of Knight Rider over nuBSG any given day, but I don't pretend the former is a kind of artistic masterpiece because I know that my personal tastes aren't some kind of universal truth.
Neither is an artistic masterpiece. All that matters is whether or not people find them entertaining.

Best to worst IMO from 1965 to just before TNG, and this it each series overall, even though some started good and went bad, or, like Galactica, started okay, got bad, then slowly started finding its feet. A lot of shows were just dull, which to me puts them behind goofy stuff like Lost In Space.

Best
  • Star Trek
  • Blake's 7
  • UFO
  • Battlestar Galactica
  • Space: 1999
  • Land of the Giants
  • Buck Rogers in the 25th Century
  • Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea
  • Logan's Run
  • Lost In Space
  • Quark ...................... a funny idea unfunny in execution
  • Fantastic Journey
  • The Time Tunnel
  • Planet of the Apes
  • The Phoenix
  • The Powers of Matthew Starr
  • Galactica 1980
  • The Starlost
  • Salvage One
Worst


Shows I didn't see or have forgotten but were on:
  • The Man From Atlantis
  • The Invisible Man
  • Time Express (1979)
  • Voyagers!
  • Gemini Man

Speaking of bad, anyone remember Space Rangers? :D
Not sure what you found wrong with Voyagers!. It never tried to pretend it was anything more than a kid-friendly time travel show.

The Man From Atlantis... the early shows weren't bad. It got more and more ridiculous as the series went on. Thank goodness Patrick Duffy went on to be Bobby Ewing.

I did this query on the IMDB:

American Sci-Fi Tv show made between 1964 and 2018:

1.670 titles...

(but a lot of them are animated shows)
Marine Boy was my 5-year-old self's favorite program.

Anyone ever see the "Logan's Run" television show. I love all things LR...but it was bad. Really, really bad.
Some of the episodes were clunkers, but a few were pretty good.

It would have been better if it had followed the novels instead of the movie, but it would have required a lot more sex, skimpy clothing, and drugs than could have been shown on TV in those days.

I actually preferred the series to the movie. Probably because I'm not into the whole dystopian thing (and maybe also because so many Star Trek alumni wrote for it).
The series was also post-apocalypse. The original novel made overpopulation and voluntary euthanasia at age 21 as the precursor to the Last Day laws and punishments.
 
There have been many well written/well produced shows that never find/connect with an audience in sufficient numbers to keep them on the air. 'Quaility' doesn't always equal 'viable/successful in the entertainment market'. Just saying.

Oh, absolutely. And the same goes for books. (I will go to my grave wondering why some books I edited didn't find larger audiences.) Just making the point that the "canon" stuff that the internet obsesses over may not be a deciding factor as far as the general audiences goes. Or determine whether a given show succeeds or fails, commercially.

The problem, of course, is that we often tend to use the same terminology to refer to both commercial and artistic failures, causing us to sometimes talk past each other.

"That show was a total disaster!"
"Huh? It ran for ten seasons and got great ratings!"
"But it sucked . . . "

Or, conversely:

"That show failed big time!"
"Huh? It was really good and got rave reviews!"
"But it was cancelled after six episodes . . ."
 
Last edited:
Not sure what you found wrong with Voyagers!. It never tried to pretend it was anything more than a kid-friendly time travel show.
Did I say it was BAD? I was simply ranking them from what I thought were best to worst. The shows above it I thought were better
 
"That show failed big time!"
"Huh? It was really good and got rave reviews!"
"But it was cancelled after six episodes . . ."

Some-one mentioned Alien Nation up thread and that's pretty much the fate it suffered. Good reviews from critcs etc but not enough ratings to save it from the can after the first season.
 
The [Logan's Run] series was also post-apocalypse. The original novel made overpopulation and voluntary euthanasia at age 21 as the precursor to the Last Day laws and punishments.
Yes, but at least with the series, the protagonists were, at least part of the time, exploring strange new . . . outposts of Humanity, instead of just running from (or submitting to) hopelessness.
 
It's something like a minor miracle that the CW has stuck with CRAZY EX-GIRLFRIEND despite its abysmal ratings.

See also THE AMERICANS, whose rave reviews (and sheer quality) have never really translated to ratings success.
 
Did I say it was BAD? I was simply ranking them from what I thought were best to worst. The shows above it I thought were better
It's a natural assumption that you thought it was bad, given that it was on your "worst" list.

No need to get testy about it.

Yes, but at least with the series, the protagonists were, at least part of the time, exploring strange new . . . outposts of Humanity, instead of just running from (or submitting to) hopelessness.
Did you read the books (there were three of them: Logan's Run, Logan's Search, and Logan's World)?

The characters in the novel are not stuck in the city, nor is there only one city. There are numerous city-enclaves all over the world, connected by maze cars, and everyone who ever had a crystal implanted in them is subject to the laws of Last Day and Deep Sleep. It doesn't matter if a person lives in a city or has become part of a gang of Pleasure Gypsies or lives a hermit's life outside a city. If a Runner leaves a North American city to try to hide in a city in Asia, DS will still find him/her.

This is why the search for Sanctuary is so difficult in the book - there's nowhere to go - or at least that's how it is for most Runners, since most don't survive long enough to reach the final stages of the journey to Sanctuary (which is a real place).
 
@Maurice, kinda looks like a live action Thunderbirds, but with UFOs. Oh, wait, it's the same creator. No wonder.

It was Anderson's first "live action" series. Those who are acquainted with Anderson's work will note how with each successive production, the puppets are constructed with ever more realistic proportions and features. His previous series, "Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons" had reached a point where the puppets looked more like store mannequins rather than cartoon styled caricatures. The next logical step was finally employing live actors.
 
It's a natural assumption that you thought it was bad, given that it was on your "worst" list.

No need to get testy about it.
I'm not being testy. But I posted no "worst list". I posted a spectrum from best to worst and Voyagers! landed behind a lot of other shows that I think were better.
 
@Timewalker:

@Maurice put Voyagers! in the section labeled "Shows I didn't see or have forgotten but were on." "Best" and "Worst" were the labels of the endpoints of the previous list that began with Star Trek and ended with Salvage One.

Best to worst IMO from 1965 to just before TNG, and this it each series overall, even though some started good and went bad, or, like Galactica, started okay, got bad, then slowly started finding its feet. A lot of shows were just dull, which to me puts them behind goofy stuff like Lost In Space.

Best
  • Star Trek
  • Blake's 7
  • UFO
  • Battlestar Galactica
  • Space: 1999
  • Land of the Giants
  • Buck Rogers in the 25th Century
  • Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea
  • Logan's Run
  • Lost In Space
  • Quark ...................... a funny idea unfunny in execution
  • Fantastic Journey
  • The Time Tunnel
  • Planet of the Apes
  • The Phoenix
  • The Powers of Matthew Starr
  • Galactica 1980
  • The Starlost
  • Salvage One
Worst


Shows I didn't see or have forgotten but were on:
  • The Man From Atlantis
  • The Invisible Man
  • Time Express (1979)
  • Voyagers!
  • Gemini Man

Speaking of bad, anyone remember Space Rangers? :D
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top