• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Superman prequel series Metropolis order by DC's digital service

Lois Lane is hardly "a generic reporter person." She's the archetypal fearless investigative journalist and daredevil adventuress. A similar character, Brenda Starr, had her own comic strip for 61 years, plus a Columbia serial, two TV movies, and a feature film. And she even had a real-life antecedent, the intrepid Nellie Bly, whose life could make a great movie or TV series.
 
I'm in.

Lois Lane is hardly "a generic reporter person." She's the archetypal fearless investigative journalist and daredevil adventuress. A similar character, Brenda Starr, had her own comic strip for 61 years, plus a Columbia serial, two TV movies, and a feature film.
And arguably the most famous female fictional character of the 20th century.

ETA: I would also like to interject something here. I'm assuming Adams will continue to be in future JLA films. And, of course, Bruce is on Gotham.

And yet, Arrow will no longer be able to use Slade. What exactly are the rules, again?
 
Last edited:
Is this for real, and not some kind of joke?

I would love the idea of a Lois Lane solo series, if only it weren't from the Gotham people. And what's with that blurb? Lois and Lex investigating fringe science together? What the hell??
The Lex Files ?
 
It might be, but I'll assume it at least starred Superboy and was about him. To me a bad rom-com is worse then a bad action/adventure type show.
See, to me, Clark's relationship with Lois is utterly central to his character, and at least (read: more) important/interesting than the super-smackdown of the week. So Lois & Clark was an entirely legitimate Superman show as far as I'm concerned, particularly given that it's just one among many live-action adaptations. Why not embrace a variety of approaches and styles, emphasizing different aspects of the character and his well-known story?

(And I'm not trying to change your opinion -- like that's gonna happen -- but merely offering my own.)
 
Last edited:
Can't say I'm all that interested. I got bored with Gotham...and yeah, it's basically, Batman without just doing Batman. So, the idea of a Superman show without Superman... meh. Does Superman exist in this world? But, he just hasn't shown up, so are we going to get hints of Superman showing up?
And the pitch basically sounds like X-Files meets Pre-Existing IP. Pass.

A Lois Lane comic, however, would be awesome.
 
You do know who you are talking to, right?
LOL. Well, I did say I didn't expect to change his mind.
Like The Realist, I care about Lois.
I should add that, depending on how he's written and played, the potential is certainly there for me to care about Lex, too. Michael Rosenbaum made that character the most compelling, fascinating thing about Smallville -- along with the show's writers, who somehow displayed about twice the talent when writing Lex as they did most any other character.
 
A Lois Lane comic, however, would be awesome.

Like this?
latest
 
ETA: I would also like to interject something here. I'm assuming Adams will continue to be in future JLA films. And, of course, Bruce is on Gotham.

And yet, Arrow will no longer be able to use Slade. What exactly are the rules, again?

I think they tend to allow the use of different versions of the same character, e.g. a younger version of the character before they had the role and relationships we know, because then there isn't direct competition or the potential for confusion or whatever. As long as it's changed enough that nobody's likely to mistake one for the other, then they seem to be okay with it.



See, to me, Clark's relationship with Lois is utterly central to the character, and at least (read: more) important/interesting than the super-smackdown of the week.

Wow, I couldn't disagree more. Sure, in the '50s, when Lois had her own comic book, she was explicitly defined as Superman's Girlfriend Lois Lane and even her "solo" stories revolved around her downright pathological romantic obsession with Superman. But if you look at the character as she's been defined from at least Margot Kidder onward, a key aspect of Lois's personality is that she was already a great, world-famous, award-winning reporter long before she ever met Clark Kent. So a large part of Lois Lane's formative journey was made on her own, and that is absolutely a story I'd be interested in seeing -- if only it weren't from the Gotham people.



♫ Generic, archetypal, po-tay-to, po-tah-to, let's call the whole show off. :p

You entirely missed my point by focusing on the wrong word. The point is, Lois Lane is not a generic reporter, she is an utterly fearless, intrepid daredevil reporter. What she's an archetype of is not ordinary reporters, but that specific fictional (and occasionally real) category of exceptionally adventurous action-heroine reporters. Lois Lane is to reporters what Indiana Jones is to archaeologists. So she absolutely could hold her own as a series lead in a way that a generic reporter could not.

I mean, heck, she shouldn't be limiting herself to Metropolis investigating a large-scale version of cousin Chloe's Wall of Weird. She should be having globetrotting adventures, confronting dictators and exposing international criminal conspiracies and discovering lost cities and braving erupting volcanoes and so forth. And Lex should be the secret mastermind behind at least half of those conspiracies and disasters, with Lois gradually putting together the pieces that point in his direction.
 
Wow, I couldn't disagree more. Sure, in the '50s, when Lois had her own comic book, she was explicitly defined as Superman's Girlfriend Lois Lane and even her "solo" stories revolved around her downright pathological romantic obsession with Superman. But if you look at the character as she's been defined from at least Margot Kidder onward, a key aspect of Lois's personality is that she was already a great, world-famous, award-winning reporter long before she ever met Clark Kent. So a large part of Lois Lane's formative journey was made on her own, and that is absolutely a story I'd be interested in seeing -- if only it weren't from the Gotham people.
Think there may have been some miscommunication here. I was saying that Clark's relationship with Lois is central to his character, and by no means relegating her to mere "girlfriend" status.

I do feel, however, that both characters help define and humanize each other. The very best aspect of Henry Cavill's Superman, in my opinion, is his bond with Amy Adams's marvelous Lois. There's even this great line in a funny (and ribald) short comedy film on YouTube called "Little Man of Steel," where Clark protests to Lois that he's not one of her stories, and she replies, "Yes, you are, Clark. You're the love story of my life." I dunno, guess it's the hopeless romantic in me. :adore:
 
Think there may have been some miscommunication here. I was saying that Clark's relationship with Lois is central to his character, and by no means relegating her to mere "girlfriend" status.

That's what I'm saying too. A story about Clark (at least as an adult reporter) needs Lois, but a story about Lois doesn't need Clark, because the story of her career began well before Clark came into her life. Lois's established personality and backstory qualifies her to be the solo lead of a series about an intrepid investigative reporter.
 
^ And I said nothing to the contrary. I was talking about Lois & Clark. I think a Lois solo sounds great. Go back and read my post you replied to with "Wow, I couldn't disagree more." Just where are we disagreeing, Christopher?

ETA: Well, I edited my earlier post to fix a possible ambiguity, but it appears we're done with this discussion anyway.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top