I do hope Adam Strange gets to suit up, but seeing him in earth clothes on Krypton is Quote discouraging.
I think this is going to bomb.
Hard.
The idea that Kryptonian houses display their sigils constantly on their wardrobe and other possessions has been a pretty standard idea ever since Marlon Brando sported the S shield on his robes made of front-projection material. Heck, on Supergirl, young Kara even had the House of El sigil on her jammies.
There were fans of Smallville back then who didn't even realize it had any connection to Superman and were startled when they were told it did. They knew next to nothing about Superman and came to the show because of its teen-drama elements, or because they liked to look at the pretty people starring in it.
.
I love how the \S/ is different between the various previews. Is this the final one? Will they change it before the premiere? Who knows.
I can testify that my teenage niece was hooked on SMALLVILLE, even though she was only vaguely aware that it was connected to Superman somehow. Words like "kryptonite" and "Bizarro" and "Jimmy Olsen" meant nothing to her, but she still watched the show religiously because she was caught up in the drama of Clark and Lana and Lex and Chloe . . . .
Meanwhile, somebody mentioned MERLIN earlier. Let it be noted that that show ran for years even though we all knew that Arthur and Guenevere were going to get together, that Morgana was going to turn evil, and the Camelot was going to fall in the end . ...
Five hundred year old spoilers be damned.![]()
Which all really falls under the overarching question of "why?" It just seems like an odd choice for a Superman show. I mean I get that they can't just do Smallville all over again and 'Supergirl' would make a straight-up Superman/Metropolis/Lois Lane type show seem a little redundant, but if they wanted a Superman related setting with a futuristic city and flying cars then wouldn't 'Superboy and the Legion of Superheroes' be a better fit? I mean for one thing you actually get to use a time travelling Clark for one thing!
Why?
Because it's a part of the Superman mythos that's never really been touched up We've seen how the ghosts or Krypton's past comes back to haunt Superman/Supergirl so this gives them a chance to tell a tale of how some of those ghosts came about.
I think this is probably why they added the whole thing with Adam Strange and Superman's enemies from the future.Personally I'm not bothered so much by the usual "we know where it's going" feeling that comes with any prequel (hell, that's often part of the attraction!) What gives me pause is basically twofold: -
1) Up to this point I don't think we've been given any reason to think there's any backstory worth telling regarding Jor-El's father. Indeed, for the most part the general notion seems to be that prior to it's destruction, Krypton society had plateaued and become rather stagnant several millennia back and as such not a lot really happened save for Zod's attempted coup, which is very more a Jor-El thing.
And like I said, if they're going to go that sort of direction anyway, wouldn't a LoSH series with a twenty-something Clark make more sense?I think this is probably why they added the whole thing with Adam Strange and Superman's enemies from the future.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.