I dislike INS because it is tepid, unremarkabke, unengaging foolishness.
[...]
INS is TNG era Trek at its absolute worst.

I dislike INS because it is tepid, unremarkabke, unengaging foolishness.
[...]
INS is TNG era Trek at its absolute worst.
And, I think the fact that whenever it comes up, the controversy about it's ethical subject matter gets debated strongly actually does say something for its effectiveness.
The movie does show that the Son'a go legitimately unrecognized by the Ba'ku. (Assuming that they aren't lying. Maybe both factions are just lying their asses off.Then, the first time Picard beams down to the village there is a Son'a officer there, and he also mentions that he is from the 'Son'a' command. So at that point in time the Ba'ku either already knew the Son'a were behind it all, and deliberately choose not to tell Picard their little history together, or they didn't even think of who those Son'a really might be until Picard discovered their DNA matched
We already knew the effects were limited to when you were there. Otherwise the Son'a would have still looked the same and would have had no reason for their whole dastardly plan in the first place.2. Magic radiation thing has characters wondering if the fixing-up properties are temporary. "Nemesis" quickly proves it is (thank Geordi), so "Insurrection" loses 98% of its point right off the bat because the goal was to collect the magic radiation to fix people up
Not true.3. Nor does it help that Worf is showing the gorch pimples/measles/herpes thing before they go into the briar patch
I'm not totally sure I get what this means?11. Movie feels like a cast reunion party with alcohol served where they forget there's an audience that's noting all the binge drinking (the same thing is much worse in "First Contact")
What has that got to do with the Prime Directive? Plus, so steamy that they never kiss!23. Kinda surprised Picard goes against the Prime Directive, in forming a steamy relationship with Anij
Not true, although I can see why it keeps coming up again and again.25. Did they run out of time in the post-production room? The Collector sets are all unfinished blue-screen.
I don't dislike it. I reserve that "honor" for Star Trek: Nemesis and Star Trek Into Darkness. With STID, I was trying hard -- and failing -- not to laugh all through the second half. You can ask my brother who I went to see it with. After a certain point, I couldn't take the movie seriously anymore. I was trying my best to hold it together during scenes I knew were supposed to be serious; but back to Insurrection.
Insurrection is just kind of... there.
It wants to be an action-comedy but it was pitched as something more serious. The problem is we're supposed to care about the Son'a and the Baku and I really don't. So it's hard to get invested when Picard melodramatically says, "How many people does it take, Admiral?!" I think some of the lines were written just because they knew it would look good in the trailer. "No uniform, no orders." "Saddle up, lock and load." "NEEYAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!"
When I look at the cast, it looks like they just want to hang out. It's more like, "Hey! We're doin' another one!" And that's the vibe I get. They're just a little too super-relaxed, like they forgot the camera was on... (using Announcer Voice) Until it's time for a line in the Trailer!
On the other hand, I like the playful soundtrack I always wondered what would taste good with chrysanthemums.
For me, I enjoy the movie enough, even though it IS underwhelming... my biggest complaint is how shoddy the special effects are. After seeing the gorgeous Enterprise-E model done for First Contact, why they decided to go with a crappy CGI Enterprise for Insurrection is beyond me. The end scene with the Enterprise speeding away from the planet is absolutely atrocious.
If I recall, most of the film's budget went on building the Baku village set, and there was little left for anything else, including a decent script or a decent length film.
It's my only Ace Card on these boards, sir ... to be used sparingly!There...see? Like I said...that meme is totally disarming!!!
![]()
Reasons:
1. Tries to feel like a TV episode but has Picard swinging around like John MaClane in Space. At least they have the magical radiation thing...
2. Magic radiation thing has characters wondering if the fixing-up properties are temporary. "Nemesis" quickly proves it is (thank Geordi), so "Insurrection" loses 98% of its point right off the bat because the goal was to collect the magic radiation to fix people up
3. Nor does it help that Worf is showing the gorch pimples/measles/herpes thing before they go into the briar patch
4. I see nothing wrong with the joystick, except it must have come from a primo arcade game
5. The "to hell with our orders" was done in the last movie and as a joke. Roger Ebert wasn't the only one who pointed out people wouldn't take it seriously this time.
6. Confused ethics
7. Sona are Baku's parents, who kick them out. The reasons for their separation aren't well-handled and, after thinking into it, the Baku are a bunch of jerks
8. Anij would have more of a fun time with Data
9. That Gilbert and Sullivan song... um...
10. Worf is back, no reason why, wasn't there a war going on with the Dominion or something?
11. Movie feels like a cast reunion party with alcohol served where they forget there's an audience that's noting all the binge drinking (the same thing is much worse in "First Contact")
12. Even if the magic radiation worked, there is absolutely no reason they couldn't set up a hotel on the other side of the planet and get Gilligan and the other castaways to run it.
13. Really forced dialogue. "Hey, you notice your boobies have firmed up? Not that we care about that sort of thing in this day and age." (Makes even the clunkiest, sculpted dialogue in "The Neutral Zone" feel more authentic and less contrived by comparison.)
14. Anij would have had more fun with Data
15. Magical radiation has no effect on anybody until after puberty kicks in. Isn't that nice?
16. When they hired Anthony Zerbe, did they bother looking up to see if he played villains who got their heads blown up in their death scenes? But if a Trek fan isn't a James Bond fan or vice-versa, then it's okay.
17. The white waiter uniforms were a mistake
18. "The ends justify the means" makes no sense when the numbers involved render the point moot
19. How can Anij slow down time? The magic radiation makes them all immortal (but only after puberty sets in)
20. They can have kids but they don't have many. Along with warp technology, or any technology, do we really want to ask about population control methods? This magic radiation doesn't do other things we don't know about? Apart from slowing down time at will, apparently.
21. Which goes right back to "Only 600 people and they can't go to the other side of the planet to open up the spa to heal everyone"
22. Imagine if this film had more solid dialogue and a solid plot. F Murray Abraham's Ru'afo might truly be in the ranks of Kirk, Chang, etc. As it stands, he elevates mediocre dialogue unworthy of TNG.
23. Kinda surprised Picard goes against the Prime Directive, in forming a steamy relationship with Anij
24. Anij would have had much more fun with Data, especially since she can slow down time
25. Did they run out of time in the post-production room? The Collector sets are all unfinished blue-screen.
26. Who the heck puts a self-destruct button on something that amounts to a gigantic butterfly net?! And WHY?!!
27. The movie doesn't know when to be a TV episode and when to be big epic flick, as nummerous scenes flip-flop on
28. How come the bridge viewscreen is now a permanent fixture when, in the previous movie, it shimmied on and off when needed.
29. A "fountain of youth" idea is pretty cheesy to begin with, especially when it plays God with magic inconsistent, convoluted, ultimately ineffective, nonsense radiation - Even "Star Wars" doesn't go there, not that I know of or would want to know of
30. Insurrection's other 2% is the Sona/Baku feud that you'd see on a daytime talk show
31. To enjoy this film, one has to turn off one's brain. Data has an easier job in doing that
32. How come Data can stay afloat in water?
33. Why did the cloaked transport ship need to be on the planet's surface if everybody was going to be beamed into it?
34. Never mind launching it from the planet into space for quite the fun awakening if they're all being abducted while sleeping so what's the POINT of it if the goal was to transport the lot of them somewhere and then do a Dark Helmet and laugh "Fooled you, ha ha!" as they start to age?
35. Which means the 98% of the movie revolving around magical radiation to save people's lives was addressing itself as already being pointless without the need of Geordi still needing optic implants again in "Nemesis". The moment you leave you're SOL anyway so bottling and selling it wouldn't have made any difference
36. Anij and Data, if sitting on a tree and k-i-s-s-i-n-g, would quickly understand what Isaac Newton's apple went through, given Data's mass as applied onto the branch as weight
37. To enjoy this film, one has to turn off one's brain. Data has an easier job in doing that
38. See 31 and 37, cubed.
Other than that, some action dogfight scenes are pretty good but the plot is a mess. But I'm tempted to scope out SF Debris and Red Letter Media to re-view their critiques - after getting some pizza roles; they covered more plotholes and problems than what I remember. It's been a couple years now...
Face it, the movie is more convoluted than 98% of my posts.Only more contrived than 247% of my posts.
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.