Again, you persist in being categorically wrong about atheism. A lack of a thing, CANNOT, by definition, be that very thing. Atheism is not anything. It is an absence of a thing. None of your rationalizations can make it otherwise.
Shruggles. Stating something repeatedly isn't going to negate logic for you.
Re: "A lack of a thing, CANNOT, by definition, be that very thing."
Nice red herring. I'm not saying that atheism is not atheism. I'm saying that
believing something doesn't exist is, gasp, a belief. It's takes a lot of mental gymnastics to deny something that straight forward!
Atheists might not like the idea that they have beliefs, which is pretty funny actually. But, yes, you can have a belief that something doesn't exist. D'oh, that's not hard to figure out. Just because it is a belief that something doesn't exist does not negate the fact that you believe it doesn't exist.
Great quote by the way, "Atheism is not anything." If it's not anything, why so touchy?! Seems like it is something!
Re: "It is an absence of a thing."
Yep, you
believe in that absence. Again, it's a belief. Atheism is an affirmation that a supreme being doesn't exist. You've stated previously that atheism doesn't require evidence, which ironically only pushes it further into the belief category!
If there were evidence, I'd grant you that it's more a statement of fact (in that case) rather than a belief.
It's believers that don't require evidence. As you say, atheists don't require evidence--which only proves the case that atheism is a belief!
If atheists truly had a lack of a belief about the matter, then when asked about the existence of god, they'd answer "I don't know"--because they had no belief in the matter.