Not sure what you mean. Are you suggesting that TOS was badly written? Or just my silly riff on the theme?
I was referring to STD.
Not sure what you mean. Are you suggesting that TOS was badly written? Or just my silly riff on the theme?
For you.
So, majority rule?And others.
And others.
So, majority rule?
"R rated content - what does it add?" apparently breasts and curse words.
Id like to think an R rating can serve to do two things.
1.) ruin something, done for the sake of doing it
2.) remove limitations for some, letting someone tell the story that they want without having to worry about limitations to their character or story.
whereas there is no promise that the second option will yield a good film or television show, my experience is the second option almost always yields something I don't like watching.
You don't need an R rating for those things to happen they can happen just as easily if you impose limitations.
But couldn't part of the problem be the US ratings system its self. As I said earlier nothing I've seen would get it more than a 15 certificate in the UK as this is what is allowed.
http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/15
Or perhaps us Brits are just a bit more relaxed about such things.
So, majority rule?
Good to see GR's vision is alive and well.Of, course! As mentioned earlier, it all boils down to earnings.
Good to see GR's vision is alive and well.
Like I said, GR's vision.Actually, it's a vision of all for-profit corporations.
Like I said, GR's vision.
GR wanted to make money is the point since it is being missed.For-profit corporations maximize profits not to honor whatever vision GR had.
GR wanted to make money is the point since it is being missed.
It's that making money was a part of GR"s vision that is being missed. You mention that it is just about earnings, and not "whatever vision GR had." The thing is, GR wanted to make money-thus "his vision."How is making money being missed?
I remember a quote from Majrel Barret but don't remember the context:Like I said, GR's vision.
Making money IS THE VISION. There really wasn't a whole lot more to it than that. Yes, he wanted to write a good story and look to the future and all, but ultimately his goal was to sell a TV series to the networks and create a brand that could stand out from the competition. He felt his vision was "superior" than other visions mainly because he thought/hoped it would make more money than the others.How is making money being missed?
It's that making money was a part of GR"s vision that is being missed. You mention that it is just about earnings, and not "whatever vision GR had." The thing is, GR wanted to make money-thus "his vision."
ETA-TL: DR tongue in cheek comment devolved in to way to serious discussion.
Making money IS THE VISION. There really wasn't a whole lot more to it than that. Yes, he wanted to write a good story and look to the future and all, but ultimately his goal was to sell a TV series to the networks and create a brand that could stand out from the competition. He felt his vision was "superior" than other visions mainly because he thought/hoped it would make more money than the others.
But couldn't part of the problem be the US ratings system its self..
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.